AMD Ryzen 5000 Builders Thread

Page 33 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

B-Riz

Golden Member
Feb 15, 2011
1,482
612
136
Last edited:

Noid

Platinum Member
Sep 20, 2000
2,376
183
106
PBO2 -20 +100MHz = 5GHz
( PBO did nothing for my 3800x or 3950XT - old BIOS )
All of my other PBO's var's are Auto.

My CB23 increased over 1100 points.
( to 23k+ )( CO all core -20 )
Time Spy CPU score up 100.

AIDA says my latency suffers thou ...

[ Edit ]
Closed P95 after 9+ hrs error free at CO all core -20 except for core #21 at -15.
But, when I launched the HB benchmark ( here ) I rebooted.
Moved core #21 to -10.
Gained 5 seconds on my boost mode score
( encoded 1806 frames in 166.40s)
I lost 900 points in MC CB23 ( down to 22,200 ) with core #21 at -10.
AIDA boost hits only 4.775 GHz now
Time Spy CPU lost 200 points - despite logging my CPU at 5051Ghz.

The OCCT SSE test did not catch my undervolt instability.

Let the chip do what it wants ...

[ Edit 2 ]
PBO took a chunk from my MC CB23 All Core OC ( 4.6Ghz ) also.
No more PBO for me.

OC is always a balance for me.
PBO ? -- yea I tried it --- tastes bitter
 

Attachments

  • 5000.png
    5000.png
    103 KB · Views: 19
  • CB23_PBO_1.JPG
    CB23_PBO_1.JPG
    64.4 KB · Views: 20
Last edited:

Jtaylor

Junior Member
May 5, 2010
7
0
66
So I’ve updated the bios on my board to the latest release from earlier this month. Basically started from scratch again.

just to be clear I only care about single core boost as this is a gaming pc and why I bought the 5600x version.

I’ve included 2 pictures 1 with cb23 multi thread and the other single thread. Both show hwinfo details, I reset them after running each test. Zentimings is on second picture.

I tested each core with curve optimizer for 2hrs or if they crashed before time limit (then adjusted CO)with prime95 small fft+avx.
Core 1&2 are preferred cores. I’m currently testing all core stability.

I also used boostTester and every core but the 2 preferred stopped boosting till about 4940-4970ghz, cores 1/2 stopped about 5030ghz I think it was. So I stopped increasing boost.
Cooling: ek 360mm Aio

settings:
CO: -16, -3, -7, -17, -17, -20. Cores are in order 0-5.
PBO: +375 MHz offset
Power limits: manual. I used the same watt and amp limits as the 5800x 125w tdp processors.
Scalar: 3x

everything else is pretty much on default. I noticed all core tops out at 4.6ghz. Apart from scalar anything else that would ensure higher consistency and sustainable single core boosting? You see anything out of the ordinary or something I can improve?

View attachment 38515
View attachment 38515
View attachment 38515
It'd be more helpful, if you post a screenshot of HWInfo (6.40) sensor panel during cb
 

Attachments

  • cb23.mt.jpg
    cb23.mt.jpg
    950.8 KB · Views: 34
  • cb23.st.jpg
    cb23.st.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 32
Last edited:

amrnuke

Golden Member
Apr 24, 2019
1,181
1,772
136
So I’ve updated the bios on my board to the latest release from earlier this month. Basically started from scratch again.

just to be clear I only care about single core boost as this is a gaming pc and why I bought the 5600x version.

I’ve included 2 pictures 1 with cb23 multi thread and the other single thread. Both show hwinfo details, I reset them after running each test. Zentimings is on second picture.

I tested each core with curve optimizer for 2hrs or if they crashed before time limit (then adjusted CO)with prime95 small fft+avx.
Core 1&2 are preferred cores. I’m currently testing all core stability.

I also used boostTester and every core but the 2 preferred stopped boosting till about 4940-4970ghz, cores 1/2 stopped about 5030ghz I think it was. So I stopped increasing boost.
Cooling: ek 360mm Aio

settings:
CO: -16, 3, 7, 17, 17, 20. Cores are in order 0-5.
PBO: +375 MHz offset
Power limits: manual. I used the same watt and amp limits as the 5800x 125w tdp processors.
Scalar: 3x

everything else is pretty much on default. I noticed all core tops out at 4.6ghz. Apart from scalar anything else that would ensure higher consistency and sustainable single core boosting? You see anything out of the ordinary or something I can improve?

View attachment 38515
View attachment 38515
View attachment 38515
For your curve optimizer, just to confirm, those are all supposed to be negative numbers correct?

Can you use HWInfo graphs to show your frequency over the course of the test?
 

Jtaylor

Junior Member
May 5, 2010
7
0
66
Yes, it’s all negative. My screw up, I went ahead and edited the post to correct that.

I don’t have the graph, but I did watch the multithread test since it’s a lot shorter and that ranged from low 4,661 to high 4675mhz effective clocks in hwinfo.

after this new all core stability I can take a graph reading.

overnight sometime after 6hrs+ of no errors, I woke up to over 2k OCCT errors. So I began a new test, I raised the curve optimizer on the last core from -20 to -17, since that seems to be the outlier. Every other core crashed at that low of an offset.

the test I’m running is occt avx2 extreme for 24hrs, then I planned to run prime95 test.

For your curve optimizer, just to confirm, those are all supposed to be negative numbers correct?

Can you use HWInfo graphs to show your frequency over the course of the test?
 

PJVol

Senior member
May 25, 2020
533
446
106
I don’t have the graph
Can you make a hwinfo sensors screenshots DURING benchmark, not after it finished. You may just hit PrtScr, while running it, then paste screen copy to the Paint editor and save file as png. This is important, because there's lot of meaninful info besides effective clock.
 

Jtaylor

Junior Member
May 5, 2010
7
0
66
Sure. I added 2 samples, 1 mt & 1 st


Can you make a hwinfo sensors screenshots DURING benchmark, not after it finished. You may just hit PrtScr, while running it, then paste screen copy to the Paint editor and save file as png. This is important, because there's lot of meaninful info besides effective clock.
 

Attachments

  • cb23MT.png
    cb23MT.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 41
  • cb23ST.png
    cb23ST.png
    817.1 KB · Views: 35

PJVol

Senior member
May 25, 2020
533
446
106
Sure. I added 2 samples, 1 mt & 1 st
Our PC's are pretty much similar, and initially I thought you've hitting thermal limit, then I've made two cb r23 runs for comparision purposes, one at the idle temps (when browsing, etc.) ~ 21-22° mb temp, and another after 30 min of gaming, ~24-25° mb sensor, in attempt to reproduce your envir. conditions. PBO settings and other data in screenshot below. (hwinfo64 screens with 25°-ambient temp were lost in clipboard, so I've added from memory just eff. clocks)

What first came to mind, was that your Curve settings seemed too tight, since as you said, when running BoostTester (which is an ultra-light load) none of the cores except the best two, reached 4980 MHz.
I for my part, tuned CO so that all cores reached Boost Override value in it,
though your approach is reasonable too, and the main purpose of Boost Override might be to cap those best cores indeed, while the rest should not necessarily run as high. Rather the opposite, due to their usually inferior quality.

Summing things up, I dont think you have much to do, unless your stability criterion change from "passed Y-cruncher, OCCT and prime95 - small data set, launched together with some heavy game".
What I would do for sure is, either decrease BoostOverride to lets say 300-325, or tune the Curve, so that at least 2 best cores can reach max boost clock in lightly threaded scenarios.

PS: 23°C sensors data added
 

Attachments

  • cbr23-sensors.png
    cbr23-sensors.png
    1.6 MB · Views: 26
  • boost-tester-sensors.PNG
    boost-tester-sensors.PNG
    71.6 KB · Views: 21
  • cbr23-sensors-23°C.png
    cbr23-sensors-23°C.png
    2.4 MB · Views: 8
Last edited:

amrnuke

Golden Member
Apr 24, 2019
1,181
1,772
136
Sure. I added 2 samples, 1 mt & 1 st
Assuming your stock boost limit is 4.6, and you're +375, you should expect 4.975, though by no means is that guaranteed as that's silicon-dependent. Still, a 4.9-4.925 GHz overclock is nice! But I'm not sure why it's not coming through on the single-core CB23 score.

On to the MT, that's really odd.

CB23 MTAverage GHzCPU Core VID (Effective)TDCEDCPPTScore
amrnuke4.711.31967.5121.8113.312186
Jtaylor4.651.44471.7118.5123.712009

Really to me the biggest thing is how much voltage your cores are being fed (probably relating to my more aggressive CO). So even though your reported temp is only 75C, there are still limitations and I imagine that voltage is generating enough heat to promote throttling back to 4.65 GHz, despite that your cooler is better than mine.

Regarding my curve optimizer settings -- admittedly, I haven't run this through the grinder yet to look for WHEA errors... so mine may not be as stable as yours. Also, we might just have different silicon. My HWI result (right as CB23 was finishing - as you can see two of my cores have dropped to 99.2%!) attached.

Edit - what happens if you limit your PPT to 115W and TDC to 70 and EDC to 125 in BIOS?
 

Attachments

  • cb23mt.png
    cb23mt.png
    248.1 KB · Views: 19
Last edited:

Noid

Platinum Member
Sep 20, 2000
2,376
183
106
IF2000 + DDR4-4000 C16 = max bandwidth ?
Should I not be near 90% of 64k with my AIDA score ?
( way over 60k - my numbers look like IF 1900 )
I think I found my " bottleneck "
But, where is it ?
BIOS ?
 

Attachments

  • IF2000_Cas16_59ns.png
    IF2000_Cas16_59ns.png
    103 KB · Views: 24
  • Like
Reactions: lightmanek

thesmokingman

Platinum Member
May 6, 2010
2,307
231
106
IF2000 + DDR4-4000 C16 = max bandwidth ?
Should I not be near 90% of 64k with my AIDA score ?
( way over 60k - my numbers look like IF 1900 )
I think I found my " bottleneck "
But, where is it ?
BIOS ?

The performance of your L3 cache is abysmal. You're system isn't happy with the IF at 2000 obviously.
 

amrnuke

Golden Member
Apr 24, 2019
1,181
1,772
136
What I still can't comprehend is why core VIDs behave so differently. In yours and Jtaylor's and many other peep's screens they seemed more or less uniform, while in my case VID's fluctuates in quite a wide range.
I've never done proper stability testing - the system works just fine for everything I've been doing, except Paint3D, which crashes on saving, and crashes if I drag the window to my second monitor. So I got AIDA64 and ran the memory testing. You know how snappy my computer must be with a 5600X and 3733 14-15-14-30 memory and an SSD. Well, that also means that the BSOD with WHEA error popped up quite quickly. I mean, it was stunningly fast - fastest BSOD after an action I've ever seen! That's that Zen 3 IPC baby! MemTest errors all over too.

So if it makes you feel any better, it looks like I've got some work to do!
 

PJVol

Senior member
May 25, 2020
533
446
106
amrnuke
wow... some Paint3D related news, lol, thats surely strange and l'd suspect 2d-driver is the cause. You know, I've got vega56 before, and with 5700xt now, despite numerous complains of blackscreens and other s..t happen reports, I see display driver (2D) bugs is most annoying, and from peeps experience with 2-monitor setups its more obvious.
Btw, regarding snappy-thing, how do you see the responsiveness of UI might feel, if I move OS from 850 evo (sata mode) to my 2nd drive, that is nvme 970 evo plus? I mean is it worth the time wasted for transfering windows.
 

Noid

Platinum Member
Sep 20, 2000
2,376
183
106
If you have PBO enabled it seems increasing EDC value can revert the L3 performance loss

PBO was Auto = On
I could not find any reference for PPT TDC or EDC for my config.

EDC = 160
( nothing else changed = all AUTO )

3Dmark 70 points under my BEST boost score at IF1900.
Nanos look Ok.
As you can see ,,, I recovered ALOT of L3 bandwidth

Still experimenting ... and reading your posts ..
.. thank you all
 

Attachments

  • EDC_160_2.png
    EDC_160_2.png
    103 KB · Views: 18

Jtaylor

Junior Member
May 5, 2010
7
0
66
I did this and my scores dropped in cb23. I noticed all core dropped to 4570mhz to 4598mhz.

I’m not sure what else to do, guess it’s just the roll of the dice for silicone lottery. Seems my chips require a little too much volts. I also noticed they seemed a little higher than normal, but that just might be lack of testing from others.

most people I’ve seen with very high clocks or high negative CO haven’t done much testing. I think most people who have over -20 CO will have stability issues and whea errors. Passing cb23 or CPU-Z isn’t my idea of good standard for stability testing. That seems like such a huge offset if trying to run high cpu frequencies for ryzen.

good thing is it passed prime95 small fft+avx for 25hrs, so these OC results look stable. Will move on to occt and then wrap this up.

Edit - what happens if you limit your PPT to 115W and TDC to 70 and EDC to 125 in BIOS?
 
Last edited:

Justinus

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2005
3,173
1,515
136
One last hurrah for bios 3003 before i update to a bios with AMD AM4 AGESA V2 PI 1.2.0.0 and support for Nvidia smart access memory.
Cold air benching with EK custom waterloop+TechN Zen3 waterblock :)
Curve optimizer = -30 allcore
Stable in everything i throw at it, and no WHEA errors.

View attachment 38273

Cinebench r23 multithread = 32229 points
Cinebench r23 singlethread = 1729 points

Cinebench r20 multithread = 12441 points
Cinebench r20 singlethread = 674 points

Cinebench r15 multithread = 5404 points
Cinebench r15 multithread = 288 points

CPU-Z validator @ https://valid.x86.fr/dl125q

Some Asus realbench + Passmark performancetest numbers @ https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V10/display.php?id=135921464997 (This machine is ranked #36 out of 156355 results globally)
View attachment 38274

https://www.passmark.com/products/performancetest/index.php
Geekbench 4 @ https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/16005550
Singlethread = 8215 points
Multithread = 74733 points

Geekbench5 @ https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/6050938
Singlethread = 1844 points
Multithread = 20054 points

Some heavy IBT high+very high and Y-Cruncher numbers:
View attachment 38277

Did also run a full sweep of all 3dmarks, but i will post that in one other thread :)

[2021/01/20 16:26:21]
Ai Overclock Tuner [Manual]
BCLK Frequency [100.0000]
Memory Frequency [DDR4-3800MHz]
FCLK Frequency [1900MHz]
Core Performance Boost [Enabled]
CPU Core Ratio [Auto]
Core VID [Auto]
CCX0 Ratio [Auto]
CCX0 Ratio [Auto]
TPU [Keep Current Settings]
Performance Bias [Auto]
PBO Fmax Enhancer [Auto]
Precision Boost Overdrive [Manual]
PPT Limit [300]
TDC Limit [235]
EDC Limit [245]
Precision Boost Overdrive Scalar [Manual]
Customized Precision Boost Overdrive Scalar [4X]
Max CPU Boost Clock Override [50]
Platform Thermal Throttle Limit [Auto]
DRAM CAS# Latency [14]
Trcdrd [15]
Trcdwr [8]
DRAM RAS# PRE Time [12]
DRAM RAS# ACT Time [24]
Trc [36]
TrrdS [4]
TrrdL [4]
Tfaw [16]
TwtrS [4]
TwtrL [10]
Twr [12]
Trcpage [Auto]
TrdrdScl [2]
TwrwrScl [2]
Trfc [252]
Trfc2 [187]
Trfc4 [115]
Tcwl [14]
Trtp [6]
Trdwr [9]
Twrrd [2]
TwrwrSc [1]
TwrwrSd [6]
TwrwrDd [6]
TrdrdSc [1]
TrdrdSd [5]
TrdrdDd [5]
Tcke [Auto]
ProcODT [40 ohm]
Cmd2T [1T]
Gear Down Mode [Enabled]
Power Down Enable [Disabled]
RttNom [RZQ/7]
RttWr [RZQ/3]
RttPark [RZQ/1]
MemAddrCmdSetup [Auto]
MemCsOdtSetup [Auto]
MemCkeSetup [Auto]
MemCadBusClkDrvStren [24.0 Ohm]
MemCadBusAddrCmdDrvStren [20.0 Ohm]
MemCadBusCsOdtDrvStren [24.0 Ohm]
MemCadBusCkeDrvStren [24.0 Ohm]
Mem Over Clock Fail Count [Auto]
Voltage Monitor [Die Sense]
CPU Load-line Calibration [Level 3]
CPU Current Capability [140%]
CPU VRM Switching Frequency [Manual]
Fixed CPU VRM Switching Frequency(KHz) [500]
CPU Power Duty Control [T.Probe]
CPU Power Phase Control [Extreme]
CPU Power Thermal Control [120]
VDDSOC Load-line Calibration [Level 3]
VDDSOC Switching Frequency [Auto]
VDDSOC Phase Control [Extreme]
DRAM Current Capability [130%]
DRAM Power Phase Control [Extreme]
DRAM Switching Frequency [Auto]
CPU Core Current Telemetry [Auto]
CPU SOC Current Telemetry [Auto]
Force OC Mode Disable [Disabled]
SB Clock Spread Spectrum [Auto]
VTTDDR Voltage [Auto]
VPP_MEM Voltage [Auto]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHA [Auto]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHB [Auto]
VDDP Voltage [Auto]
1.8V Standby Voltage [Auto]
CPU 3.3v AUX [Auto]
1.2V SB Voltage [Auto]
DRAM R1 Tune [Auto]
DRAM R2 Tune [Auto]
DRAM R3 Tune [Auto]
DRAM R4 Tune [Auto]
PCIE Tune R1 [Auto]
PCIE Tune R2 [Auto]
PCIE Tune R3 [Auto]
PLL Tune R1 [Auto]
PLL reference voltage [Auto]
T Offset [Auto]
Sense MI Skew [Auto]
Sense MI Offset [Auto]
Promontory presence [Auto]
Clock Amplitude [Auto]
CPU Core Voltage [Offset mode]
- Offset Mode Sign [+]
- CPU Core Voltage Offset [0.01250]
CPU SOC Voltage [Manual]
- VDDSOC Voltage Override [1.11875]
DRAM Voltage [1.54500]
VDDG CCD Voltage Control [0.890]
VDDG IOD Voltage Control [Auto]
CLDO VDDP voltage [0.880]
1.00V SB Voltage [Auto]
1.8V PLL Voltage [Auto]
TPM Device Selection [Discrete TPM]
Erase fTPM NV for factory reset [Enabled]
PSS Support [Enabled]
PPC Adjustment [PState 0]
NX Mode [Enabled]
SVM Mode [Disabled]
SMT Mode [Auto]
Core Leveling Mode [Automatic mode]
CCD Control [Auto]
SATA Port Enable [Enabled]
SATA Mode [AHCI]
NVMe RAID mode [Disabled]
SMART Self Test [Enabled]
Hot Plug [Disabled]
Hot Plug [Disabled]
Hot Plug [Disabled]
Hot Plug [Disabled]
Hot Plug [Disabled]
Hot Plug [Disabled]
Hot Plug [Disabled]
Hot Plug [Disabled]
HD Audio Controller [Enabled]
PCIEX16_1 Bandwidth Bifurcation configuration [Auto Mode]
PCIEX16_2 Bandwidth Bifurcation configuration [Auto Mode]
When system is in working state [All On]
Q-Code LED Function [POST Code Only]
When system is in sleep, hibernate or soft off states [All On]
Realtek 2.5G LAN Controller [Enabled]
Realtek PXE OPROM [Disabled]
Intel LAN Controller [Enabled]
Intel LAN OPROM [Disabled]
ASM1074 Controller [Enabled]
Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) Controller [Disabled]
Bluetooth Controller [Enabled]
USB power delivery in Soft Off state (S5) [Enabled]
PCIEX16_1 Mode [Auto]
PCIEX16_2 Mode [Auto]
PCIEX1 Mode [Auto]
PCIEX16_3 Mode [Auto]
M.2_1 Link Mode [Auto]
M.2_2 Link Mode [Auto]
SB Link Mode [Auto]
ErP Ready [Disabled]
Restore AC Power Loss [Power Off]
Power On By PCI-E [Disabled]
Power On By RTC [Disabled]
Above 4G Decoding [Enabled]
Re-Size BAR Support [Auto]
SR-IOV Support [Disabled]
Legacy USB Support [Enabled]
XHCI Hand-off [Enabled]
Corsair Voyager GTX 0 [Auto]
USB Device Enable [Enabled]
U32G2_2 [Enabled]
U32G2_3 [Enabled]
U32G2_4 [Enabled]
U32G1_10 [Enabled]
U32G1_11 [Enabled]
USB12 [Enabled]
USB13 [Enabled]
U32G2_7 [Enabled]
U32G2_8 [Enabled]
U32G2_C9 [Enabled]
Network Stack [Disabled]
Device [SATA6G_7: Samsung SSD 850 PRO 1TB]
CPU Temperature [Monitor]
CPU Package Temperature [Monitor]
MotherBoard Temperature [Monitor]
VRM Temperature [Monitor]
T_Sensor Temperature [Monitor]
Water In T Sensor Temperature [Monitor]
Water Out T Sensor Temperature [Monitor]
CPU Fan Speed [Monitor]
CPU Optional Fan Speed [Monitor]
Chassis Fan 1 Speed [Monitor]
Chassis Fan 2 Speed [Monitor]
Chassis Fan 3 Speed [Monitor]
High Amp Fan Speed [Monitor]
W_PUMP+ Speed [Monitor]
AIO PUMP Speed [Monitor]
PCH Fan Speed [Monitor]
Flow Rate [Monitor]
CPU Core Voltage [Monitor]
3.3V Voltage [Monitor]
5V Voltage [Monitor]
12V Voltage [Monitor]
CPU Fan Q-Fan Control [Auto]
CPU Fan Step Up [2.1 sec]
CPU Fan Step Down [0 sec]
CPU Fan Speed Low Limit [600 RPM]
CPU Fan Profile [Manual]
CPU Fan Upper Temperature [70]
CPU Fan Max. Duty Cycle (%) [100]
CPU Fan Middle Temperature [50]
CPU Fan Middle Duty Cycle (%) [50]
CPU Fan Lower Temperature [30]
CPU Fan Min Duty Cycle (%) [40]
Chassis Fan 1 Q-Fan Control [Auto]
Chassis Fan 1 Q-Fan Source [CPU]
Chassis Fan 1 Step Up [0 sec]
Chassis Fan 1 Step Down [0 sec]
Chassis Fan 1 Speed Low Limit [600 RPM]
Chassis Fan 1 Profile [Manual]
Chassis Fan 1 Upper Temperature [70]
Chassis Fan 1 Max. Duty Cycle (%) [100]
Chassis Fan 1 Middle Temperature [50]
Chassis Fan 1 Middle Duty Cycle (%) [65]
Chassis Fan 1 Lower Temperature [20]
Chassis Fan 1 Min Duty Cycle (%) [60]
Chassis Fan 2 Q-Fan Control [Auto]
Chassis Fan 2 Q-Fan Source [CPU]
Chassis Fan 2 Step Up [0 sec]
Chassis Fan 2 Step Down [0 sec]
Chassis Fan 2 Speed Low Limit [600 RPM]
Chassis Fan 2 Profile [Manual]
Chassis Fan 2 Upper Temperature [65]
Chassis Fan 2 Max. Duty Cycle (%) [100]
Chassis Fan 2 Middle Temperature [45]
Chassis Fan 2 Middle Duty Cycle (%) [60]
Chassis Fan 2 Lower Temperature [40]
Chassis Fan 2 Min Duty Cycle (%) [60]
Chassis Fan 3 Q-Fan Control [Auto]
Chassis Fan 3 Q-Fan Source [CPU]
Chassis Fan 3 Step Up [0 sec]
Chassis Fan 3 Step Down [0 sec]
Chassis Fan 3 Speed Low Limit [600 RPM]
Chassis Fan 3 Profile [Manual]
Chassis Fan 3 Upper Temperature [70]
Chassis Fan 3 Max. Duty Cycle (%) [100]
Chassis Fan 3 Middle Temperature [45]
Chassis Fan 3 Middle Duty Cycle (%) [100]
Chassis Fan 3 Lower Temperature [40]
Chassis Fan 3 Min Duty Cycle (%) [100]
High Amp Fan Q-Fan Control [Auto]
High Amp Fan Q-Fan Source [CPU]
High Amp Fan Step Up [0 sec]
High Amp Fan Step Down [0 sec]
High Amp Fan Speed Low Limit [600 RPM]
High Amp Fan Profile [Manual]
High Amp Fan Upper Temperature [70]
High Amp Fan Max. Duty Cycle (%) [100]
High Amp Fan Middle Temperature [45]
High Amp Fan Middle Duty Cycle (%) [70]
High Amp Fan Lower Temperature [30]
High Amp Fan Min Duty Cycle (%) [60]
Water Pump+ Q-Fan Control [Auto]
Water Pump+ Q-Fan Source [CPU]
Water Pump+ Upper Temperature [70]
Water Pump+ Max. Duty Cycle (%) [100]
Water Pump+ Middle Temperature [50]
Water Pump+ Middle Duty Cycle (%) [65]
Water Pump+ Lower Temperature [30]
Water Pump+ Min Duty Cycle (%) [60]
AIO Pump Q-Fan Control [Auto]
AIO Pump Q-Fan Source [CPU]
AIO Pump Upper Temperature [70]
AIO Pump Max. Duty Cycle (%) [100]
AIO Pump Middle Temperature [50]
AIO Pump Middle Duty Cycle (%) [65]
AIO Pump Lower Temperature [30]
AIO Pump Min Duty Cycle (%) [60]
Above 4GB MMIO Limit [39bit (512GB)]
Fast Boot [Enabled]
Next Boot after AC Power Loss [Fast Boot]
Boot Logo Display [Disabled]
Bootup NumLock State [On]
POST Report [5 sec]
Wait For 'F1' If Error [Enabled]
Option ROM Messages [Force BIOS]
Interrupt 19 Capture [Disabled]
Setup Mode [Advanced Mode]
Launch CSM [Disabled]
OS Type [Other OS]
AMI Native NVMe Driver Support [Enabled]
Flexkey [Reset]
Setup Animator [Disabled]
Load from Profile [5]
Profile Name [20.01 minus 30]
Save to Profile [5]
DIMM Slot Number [DIMM_A1]
Bus Interface [PCIEX16_1]
Download & Install ARMOURY CRATE app [Enabled]
CPU Frequency [0]
CPU Voltage [0]
CCD Control [Auto]
Core control [Auto]
SMT Control [Auto]
Overclock [Enabled ]
Memory Clock Speed [Auto]
Tcl [Auto]
Trcdrd [Auto]
Trcdwr [Auto]
Trp [Auto]
Tras [Auto]
Trc Ctrl [Auto]
TrrdS [Auto]
TrrdL [Auto]
Tfaw Ctrl [Auto]
TwtrS [Auto]
TwtrL [Auto]
Twr Ctrl [Auto]
Trcpage Ctrl [Auto]
TrdrdScL Ctrl [Auto]
TwrwrScL Ctrl [Auto]
Trfc Ctrl [Auto]
Trfc2 Ctrl [Auto]
Trfc4 Ctrl [Auto]
Tcwl [Auto]
Trtp [Auto]
Tcke [Auto]
Trdwr [Auto]
Twrrd [Auto]
TwrwrSc [Auto]
TwrwrSd [Auto]
TwrwrDd [Auto]
TrdrdSc [Auto]
TrdrdSd [Auto]
TrdrdDd [Auto]
ProcODT [Auto]
Power Down Enable [Auto]
Cmd2T [Auto]
Gear Down Mode [Auto]
CAD Bus Timing User Controls [Auto]
CAD Bus Drive Strength User Controls [Auto]
Data Bus Configuration User Controls [Auto]
Infinity Fabric Frequency and Dividers [Auto]
ECO Mode [Disable]
Precision Boost Overdrive [Advanced]
PBO Limits [Motherboard]
Precision Boost Overdrive Scalar [Auto]
Curve Optimizer [Per Core]
Core 0 Curve Optimizer Sign [Negative]
Core 0 Curve Optimizer Magnitude [30]
Core 1 Curve Optimizer Sign [Negative]
Core 1 Curve Optimizer Magnitude [30]
Core 2 Curve Optimizer Sign [Negative]
Core 2 Curve Optimizer Magnitude [30]
Core 3 Curve Optimizer Sign [Negative]
Core 3 Curve Optimizer Magnitude [30]
Core 4 Curve Optimizer Sign [Negative]
Core 4 Curve Optimizer Magnitude [30]
Core 5 Curve Optimizer Sign [Negative]
Core 5 Curve Optimizer Magnitude [30]
Core 6 Curve Optimizer Sign [Negative]
Core 6 Curve Optimizer Magnitude [30]
Core 7 Curve Optimizer Sign [Negative]
Core 7 Curve Optimizer Magnitude [30]
Core 8 Curve Optimizer Sign [Negative]
Core 8 Curve Optimizer Magnitude [30]
Core 9 Curve Optimizer Sign [Negative]
Core 9 Curve Optimizer Magnitude [30]
Core 10 Curve Optimizer Sign [Negative]
Core 10 Curve Optimizer Magnitude [30]
Core 11 Curve Optimizer Sign [Negative]
Core 11 Curve Optimizer Magnitude [30]
Core 12 Curve Optimizer Sign [Negative]
Core 12 Curve Optimizer Magnitude [30]
Core 13 Curve Optimizer Sign [Negative]
Core 13 Curve Optimizer Magnitude [30]
Core 14 Curve Optimizer Sign [Negative]
Core 14 Curve Optimizer Magnitude [30]
Core 15 Curve Optimizer Sign [Negative]
Core 15 Curve Optimizer Magnitude [30]
Max CPU Boost Clock Override [0MHz]
Platform Thermal Throttle Limit [Auto]
LN2 Mode [Auto]
SoC/Uncore OC Mode [Disabled]
VDDP Voltage Control [Auto]
VDDG Voltage Control [Auto]
NUMA nodes per socket [Auto]
Custom Pstate0 [Auto]
L1 Stream HW Prefetcher [Auto]
L2 Stream HW Prefetcher [Auto]
Core Watchdog Timer Enable [Auto]
SMEE [Auto]
Core Performance Boost [Auto]
Global C-state Control [Disabled]
Power Supply Idle Control [Typical Current Idle]
SEV ASID Count [Auto]
SEV-ES ASID Space Limit Control [Auto]
Streaming Stores Control [Auto]
Local APIC Mode [Auto]
ACPI _CST C1 Declaration [Auto]
MCA error thresh enable [Auto]
PPIN Opt-in [Auto]
Fast Short REP MOVSB [Enabled]
Enhanced REP MOVSB/STOSB [Enabled]
RdRand Speedup Disable [Enabled]
IBS hardware workaround [Auto]
DRAM scrub time [Auto]
Poison scrubber control [Auto]
Redirect scrubber control [Auto]
Redirect scrubber limit [Auto]
NUMA nodes per socket [Auto]
Memory interleaving [Auto]
Memory interleaving size [Auto]
1TB remap [Auto]
DRAM map inversion [Auto]
ACPI SRAT L3 Cache As NUMA Domain [Auto]
ACPI SLIT Distance Control [Auto]
ACPI SLIT remote relative distance [Auto]
GMI encryption control [Auto]
xGMI encryption control [Auto]
CAKE CRC perf bounds Control [Auto]
4-link xGMI max speed [Auto]
3-link xGMI max speed [Auto]
xGMI TXEQ Mode [Auto]
PcsCG control [Auto]
Disable DF to external downstream IP SyncFloodPropagation [Auto]
Disable DF sync flood propagation [Auto]
CC6 memory region encryption [Auto]
Memory Clear [Auto]
Overclock [Enabled]
Memory Clock Speed [Auto]
Tcl [Auto]
Trcdrd [Auto]
Trcdwr [Auto]
Trp [Auto]
Tras [Auto]
Trc Ctrl [Auto]
TrrdS [Auto]
TrrdL [Auto]
Tfaw Ctrl [Auto]
TwtrS [Auto]
TwtrL [Auto]
Twr Ctrl [Auto]
Trcpage Ctrl [Auto]
TrdrdScL Ctrl [Auto]
TwrwrScL Ctrl [Auto]
Trfc Ctrl [Auto]
Trfc2 Ctrl [Auto]
Trfc4 Ctrl [Auto]
Tcwl [Auto]
Trtp [Auto]
Tcke [Auto]
Trdwr [Auto]
Twrrd [Auto]
TwrwrSc [Auto]
TwrwrSd [Auto]
TwrwrDd [Auto]
TrdrdSc [Auto]
TrdrdSd [Auto]
TrdrdDd [Auto]
ProcODT [Auto]
Power Down Enable [Auto]
Disable Burst/Postponed Refresh [Auto]
DRAM Maximum Activate Count [Auto]
Cmd2T [Auto]
Gear Down Mode [Auto]
CAD Bus Timing User Controls [Auto]
CAD Bus Drive Strength User Controls [Auto]
Data Bus Configuration User Controls [Auto]
Data Poisoning [Auto]
DRAM Post Package Repair [Default]
RCD Parity [Auto]
DRAM Address Command Parity Retry [Auto]
Write CRC Enable [Auto]
DRAM Write CRC Enable and Retry Limit [Auto]
Disable Memory Error Injection [True]
DRAM ECC Symbol Size [Auto]
DRAM ECC Enable [Auto]
DRAM UECC Retry [Auto]
TSME [Auto]
Data Scramble [Auto]
DFE Read Training [Auto]
FFE Write Training [Auto]
PMU Pattern Bits Control [Auto]
MR6VrefDQ Control [Auto]
CPU Vref Training Seed Control [Auto]
Chipselect Interleaving [Auto]
BankGroupSwap [Auto]
BankGroupSwapAlt [Auto]
Address Hash Bank [Auto]
Address Hash CS [Auto]
Address Hash Rm [Auto]
SPD Read Optimization [Enabled]
MBIST Enable [Disabled]
Pattern Select [PRBS]
Pattern Length [6]
Aggressor Channel [1 Aggressor Channel]
Aggressor Static Lane Control [Disabled]
Target Static Lane Control [Disabled]
Worst Case Margin Granularity [Per Chip Select]
Read Voltage Sweep Step Size [1]
Read Timing Sweep Step Size [1]
Write Voltage Sweep Step Size [1]
Write Timing Sweep Step Size [1]
IOMMU [Auto]
Precision Boost Overdrive [Auto]
Precision Boost Overdrive Scalar [Auto]
FCLK Frequency [Auto]
SOC OVERCLOCK VID [0]
UCLK DIV1 MODE [Auto]
VDDP Voltage Control [Auto]
VDDG Voltage Control [Auto]
SoC/Uncore OC Mode [Auto]
LN2 Mode [Auto]
ACS Enable [Auto]
PCIe ARI Support [Auto]
PCIe ARI Enumeration [Auto]
PCIe Ten Bit Tag Support [Auto]
cTDP Control [Auto]
EfficiencyModeEn [Auto]
Package Power Limit Control [Auto]
APBDIS [Auto]
DF Cstates [Auto]
CPPC [Auto]
CPPC Preferred Cores [Auto]
NBIO DPM Control [Auto]
Early Link Speed [Auto]
Presence Detect Select mode [Auto]
Preferred IO [Auto]
CV test [Auto]
Loopback Mode [Auto]
Data Link Feature Exchange [Disabled]

If you still have this setup going, will you go to opendata.blender.org to grab blender benchmark and run it on v2.90 for all scenes on your 5950x?
 

PJVol

Senior member
May 25, 2020
533
446
106
@Jtaylor,
amrnuke


Looking at JTaylor's voltages in CBR23 MT run, at one point I even thought, maybe his CPU is the one downbinned from 2CCD chips? :)

Nevertheless,
@Jtaylor can you run CB23 mt with limits in PBO set to motherboard, instead of manual and post screenshot here, pls.

PS: Or may be his CPU is low SIDD one...
 
Last edited:

Det0x

Golden Member
Sep 11, 2014
1,028
2,953
136
Very nice curve optimizer graph from reddit.
CO chart.png
To sum it up: Like all other Ryzen before, Zen 3 likes it cool!

From the worst to the best temperature, the difference at stock is 245 Mhz (= 1233 points / + 6%).

For curve optimizer -15 it is up to 250 Mhz (= 1221 points / +5.5%) and at -30 it is 225 Mhz (= 1409 points / + 6.1%).

 

Det0x

Golden Member
Sep 11, 2014
1,028
2,953
136
If you still have this setup going, will you go to opendata.blender.org to grab blender benchmark and run it on v2.90 for all scenes on your 5950x?

Here you go, this is my normal 24/7 settings from bios dump above.
score.png

score-gpu.png

No idea if this is good or bad, but i would think a static OC would be much better in a allcore render benchmark like this (?)
My cpu allcore average effective clocks were 4620mhz in pretty much all tests..
 

PJVol

Senior member
May 25, 2020
533
446
106
To sum it up: Like all other Ryzen before, Zen 3 likes it cool!
Unbelievable!

Now, if there was a theory explaining why one chip request a good 100mv higher than another in a same temp and power restraints for a cbr23mt-like workload, it would be a nice addition to such amazing, repeated from year to year (which is typical for reddit) discoveries that Zen like it cold.
 

Justinus

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2005
3,173
1,515
136
No idea if this is good or bad, but i would think a static OC would be much better in a allcore render benchmark like this (?)
My cpu allcore average effective clocks were 4620mhz in pretty much all tests..

You've got it pretty darn dialed in. Based on my experience all core overclocking I might think you could achieve slightly higher frequency or slightly lower voltage but that benchmark, particularly the Koro scene, is extremely sensitive on my 5950x.

4.6 all core takes around 1.28v actual. My temps are a bit better, but probably just due to a slightly lower voltage. Times are practically identical, down to the second on some of the scenes.
 

Det0x

Golden Member
Sep 11, 2014
1,028
2,953
136
Unbelievable!

Now, if there was a theory explaining why one chip request a good 100mv higher than another in a same temp and power restraints for a cbr23mt-like workload, it would be a nice addition to such amazing, repeated from year to year (which is typical for reddit) discoveries that Zen like it cold.

This was about the curve optimizer scaling..
There is a upto ~650mhz difference between stock (PBO) settings and CO @ -30 at the same temperature.
At -15 CO the difference is upto ~500mhz compared to stock

--> diminishing returns with curve optimizer.

Did you already know that ? I found it interesting at least.
 
Last edited:

Shmee

Memory & Storage, Graphics Cards Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 13, 2008
7,400
2,436
146
Interesting. I am looking forward to getting my 5900X in from preorder. Though I mainly care about game performance, so I figure whatever gives me the best sustained boosts?
 

Noid

Platinum Member
Sep 20, 2000
2,376
183
106
You guys are " kinda" funny ... blaming performance on heat ...
I got OLD news info for you ... it's ALWAYS been that way .

Shmee, you will want an ALL core OC for gaming.
There is no better performance with boost mode.
( try it in 3Dmark - don't be afraid )

My AllCore temp avg under 80c on P95 with 8+ hour at 1.35v
( 32c or lower at idle - depending on ambient )
You can pay more for more fans to cool liquids, and push pumps also...

I'm on air ... with a 4.6Ghz all core
( when I want to make a difference )

You will get more, with more GPU for gaming.
( my upgrade to a 5900x from, 3900xt was minimal at gaming )

However, the encoding in my background processes while I am gaming is not so noticed now .
( both are 12 core )

If you really want to " feel " a difference, get more cores !
( or more GPU )

Also, you might want to study your current game behaviors.
( total GPU memory utilized .. load ... etc why pay more for DDR6 not used !)
 
Last edited: