***AMD Radeon HD7970 GHZ Edition - Official Reviews Thread***

Termie

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
7,949
48
91
www.techbuyersguru.com

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
$500 for a card that is on-par with the GTX 680 but loses in power, heat and noise? Morons.

$450 should have been the spot, then users can buy a custom cooler with the diff and be happy - or make custom AIBs at the $500 price point.

Oh well. Wonder if I can use that BIOS on my 7970 :D

WTB Beta 7 drivers too!
 

toyota

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
12,957
1
0
the performance is really good as it beats the 680 most of the time but yeah that power consumption, heat, and noise levels are silly.

and I knew the rumor was total bs that the card would only have a voltage 1.02. lol
 

Don Karnage

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,865
0
0
1200 boost core and it only ties the 100 dollar less 670

47616.png
 

master_shake_

Diamond Member
May 22, 2012
6,425
292
121
since when did power efficiency, heat, and noise ever become relevant in buying a graphic card?

didn't the gtx 480 destroy the notion that a noisy, hot, power sucking card was bad?
 

tigersty1e

Golden Member
Dec 13, 2004
1,963
0
76
whats to stop a partner to take existing 7970 stock and flash a ghz edition bios to the existing stock?
 

(sic)Klown12

Senior member
Nov 27, 2010
572
0
76
whats to stop a partner to take existing 7970 stock and flash a ghz edition bios to the existing stock?

Powertune is a feature with roots in both hardware and software. If one of the changes they made for it with their version of boost relies on a new or tweaked hardware component, simply using a new BIOS wouldn't work.
 

tviceman

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2008
6,734
514
126
www.facebook.com
The combo of noise and power consumption just to essentially tie the gtx680 makes this card a losing proposition for all but multi-monitor gamers. Nvidia is making bank on their smaller chip coupled with less cram and a cheaper PCB.
 
Last edited:

AnandThenMan

Diamond Member
Nov 11, 2004
3,991
627
126
The less RAM is not a positive IMO, going forward I think it will become an issue. Agreed with the rest.
 

Don Karnage

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,865
0
0
why would you cherry pick just that game? looking at most of the games even the stock 7970 ghz is faster than than 670 and usually 680.

Oh I don't know. Because 10 million plus are probably playing that game at this moment.

Also to the poster above. Warhead? Way to link a 4 year old game. No one cares about warhead
 

AnandThenMan

Diamond Member
Nov 11, 2004
3,991
627
126
Also to the poster above. Warhead? Way to link a 4 year old game. No one cares about warhead
Try reading the entire review instead of posting cherry picked benches. Smart people that actually care about the overall picture do this.
 

Don Karnage

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,865
0
0
Try reading the entire review instead of posting cherry picked benches. Smart people that actually care about the overall picture do this.

Whats you're excuse then because you're not one of the smart people. Overall picture you say?

7970GE runs Hotter, Eats more power , Makes more noise and STILL loses to the vanilla 680. Great product Amd :rolleyes:
 

The_Golden_Man

Senior member
Apr 7, 2012
816
1
0
I agree with Don Karnage here.. Who cares about an old game like Warhead..

I'm not impressed at all by AMD/ATI's desperate approach.

To top it all off, the card is utterly ugly.
 

badb0y

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2010
4,015
30
91
Ryan Smith said:
6 years is a long time to wait, but patience, perseverance, and more than a few snub moves against NVIDIA have paid off for AMD. For the first time in 6 years we can say that AMD is truly competitive for the single-GPU performance crown.
About time, now will the CPU division please deliver something competitive?
 

Final8ty

Golden Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,172
13
81
LOL damn, should of put "rumor" in the title, i'm told it stops the flames.
I'm looking forwards to playing Warhead after i finish Crysis.
 

boxleitnerb

Platinum Member
Nov 1, 2011
2,605
6
81
I thought this card should offer better performance at the same power consumption. Matured 28nm process and all. I thought wrong. This card reaches consumption and noise levels of the GTX480 which is nothing short of astonishing.

One positive thing remains, though:
Maybe AMD will now consider staying in this segment permanently and make chips as large as Nvidia.
 

Don Karnage

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,865
0
0
I thought this card should offer better performance at the same power consumption. Matured 28nm process and all. I thought wrong. This card reaches consumption and noise levels of the GTX480 which is nothing short of astonishing.

One positive thing remains, though:
Maybe AMD will now consider staying in this segment permanently and make chips as large as Nvidia.

I still can't get over how this card eats 168 more watts then a 670

47618.png
 

Jaydip

Diamond Member
Mar 29, 2010
3,691
21
81
Funny thing is NV doesn't even have to release a new edition to beat this,the custom edition 680's already do the job nicely.
 

Don Karnage

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,865
0
0
And of course you picked the lower resolution chart, lol.

Obviously this card is not the second coming of the X1950, but it's good to see competition.

What percentage of gamers do you think game at 2560x1440? It's like 2%. The majority of gamers game at 1920X1080. I believe the number is like 86%