AMD or Intel?

[Gamingphreek]

Originally posted by: Noob

Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Noob then if you didn't know about the 1000000000 of of threads you do now. So stop posting on this one and look at one of them.

Secondly you didn't search very hard as AT did a review of the FSB increase about 1 month ago.

Secondly this turns into a flame war not because anyone is stupid but because people have their own opinions. People also would be a bit less agitated if we didn't see the same exact question asked 50 times a day.

THINK BEFORE YOU POST!



-Kevin

As I said before. I could not find anything about it's comparison to the FX 55.

How can you not. It is 5 down in the CPU's section.

And if you didn't want to do that. I google searched this "1066 FSB Benchmarks" without the quotes of course and a bench was in every result.

Like i said you are just trying to cause problems.

-Kevin

 

[BW86]

Heres a benchmark.

http://hardocp.com/article.html?art=NjgyLDM=

The FX-55 is alot better than the P4 3.46EE

 

[imported_Noob]

Originally posted by: Gamingphreek

Originally posted by: Noob

Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Noob then if you didn't know about the 1000000000 of of threads you do now. So stop posting on this one and look at one of them.

Secondly you didn't search very hard as AT did a review of the FSB increase about 1 month ago.

Secondly this turns into a flame war not because anyone is stupid but because people have their own opinions. People also would be a bit less agitated if we didn't see the same exact question asked 50 times a day.

THINK BEFORE YOU POST!



-Kevin

As I said before. I could not find anything about it's comparison to the FX 55.

How can you not. It is 5 down in the CPU's section.

And if you didn't want to do that. I google searched this "1066 FSB Benchmarks" without the quotes of course and a bench was in every result.

Like i said you are just trying to cause problems.

-Kevin

I have just searched on specificaly what you said. The only one I found was:

http://hardocp.com/article.html?art=NjgyLDU=

Which lists old games which don't require a beefy computer to play it. And I would never have guessed that people would act like such babies. And if people were "required" to know everything about a certain topic, then what would be the point of asking questions on the forums? It's not like I asked an extremely vague question. I gave specifics as to what I wanted to know.

 

[Gamingphreek]

IF you Google:

1066 FSB Benchmarks you should come up with this

http://www.google.com/search?h...hmarks&btnG=Search

There are way more reviews than one on that page.

Also even the |H| review you are wrong about. I would hardly say the DIII is old and doesn't require a beefy computer. The only computers that can run it at max settings are SLI systems.

Like i said you are trying to cause problems.

-Kevin

 

[imported_Noob]

It is being tested at a very low res. 640x480. You can run it on medium computers. Plus look at the majority of games. Commanche 4, UT 2003, etc. I would classify those as old

 

[Gamingphreek]

Yes because you want it as CPU dependant as possible.

Ifyou crank up the settings who gives a crap about the CPU unless the CPU is holding the GPU back.

Again you are just trying to cause problems.

Now, kindly think before you post again and stop trying to prove everyone wrong.

-Kevin

 

[imported_Noob]

Look who is the one putting words into one's mouth. if I was trying to cause problems, i would say "AMD sucks, Intel is better." It's not like I'm here to impress anybody. And the point of forums is to discuss things and inform one another on whatever the topic is about. This would all be a lot easier if one gave a straight simple answer. And it's not like I was asking an extremely vague "AMD or Intel" question. I know the forums I have been on, people don't act like this. They use what a forum is meant for, to inform and discuss.

 

[Gamingphreek]

Yes and this forums has been used 384238320984039284092380 times for this exact quesiton. That is why there is a search feature!

You are causing problems because:
1. You are purposely being helpless and reporting only the first item on each page
2. You ask a question that is on the front page of the cpu forums daily as it is
3. You try to prove everyone wrong and tell everyone off

If you want to have fun and have a good time in these forums i would advise that you stop acting like you know everything there is to know, and stop trying to tell people off who are trying to help you and above all:
Stop trying to cause problems.

-Kevin

 

[imported_Noob]

Who was I flaming that was trying to help me. And I was purposely being helpless? I didn't see anything about the 1066MHz FSB on the fron page on the CPU forums. That's a weak arguement. I didn't start the flaming, so don't say I am trying to cause arguments.

 

[bim27142]

cmon' guys?! chill out..............

 

[imported_Noob]

Originally posted by: cubby1223
I agree with Mik3y - the question should have never been asked. There are probably thousands upon thousands of benchmarks out by now over the internet comparing AMD performance to intel, why not look at Anandtech's reviews, or better yet search google? But Noob doesn't trust benchmarks. So how the hell is he going to get advice? Anyone here own both a 1066fsb Pentium & an Athlon FX and equally swap between them running all the popular games? I don't think so. All anyone here can do is regurgitate the benchmarks that are found all over the internet, which is what Noob should have done in the first place, and already given that he doesn't trust them...

I don't trust the benchmarks that give scores based on benchmark programs. I trust tests give the actuall FPS through tests. as you may know, benchmark programs give a higher score, for example, to the 6800 rather then the X800. But the X800 is always getting higher FPS in most of the games. So you should have read to what I said. I don't beleive the benchmark programs. I do believe the comparisons when they test hardware head-to-head with games.

 

[Gamingphreek]

Originally posted by: Noob
Who was I flaming that was trying to help me. And I was purposely being helpless? I didn't see anything about the 1066MHz FSB on the fron page on the CPU forums. That's a weak arguement. I didn't start the flaming, so don't say I am trying to cause arguments.

Not only is it on the CPU forums it is under the CPU tab on the main AT sight. You couldn't get any more simple without being on the front page again.

You are not quite flaming yet but borderline trolling, because you are asking questions even though they have been answered again, then lying about what i verified was there.

By posting this thread you are trying to cause arguments as welll as inviting flaming. What dont you understand about that!?!? Its not hard!

X800 allways wins. I think not. See you just did it again you brought another topic into this one which has been aske 45561654611 times. What you are doing now is limiting any help and negating any help and others just gave you.

Ok now as for me im done, i do think it would be a wise idea on your part to save all the flames and crap and just edit the post out. I have provided you with countless benchmarks and people have given their opinion. Enough thread over

Im through with this arguing.

-Kevin

 

[imported_Noob]

The X800 doesn't win in points with benchmarks programs. But it wins in FPS tests. Not just for that video card as well. So now you know for the 10th time I don't trust benchmark PROGRAMS. But I do believe FPS tests using different hardware. That's what I am looking for. And I know what the opinion will be when it comes to AMD vs. Intel. That is why I asked the most recent question about the AMD vs. Intel competition. I know that the FSB speed is one of the most important components, if not the most important, to computer speed. So I asked to see if Intel was able to suprase AMD. If there had been no increase in the FSB with Intel, this conversation would not be taking place. I know what the obvious answer would be. So I was specific in what I was saying. I wasn't asking a plain AMD vs. Intel question. I am done with this bs bickerign as well.

 

[Mik3y]

Originally posted by: Noob
6) You will die due to lack of intellectual horsepower.

die of intellectual horsepower?? who's the one asking questions when all the answers are just a few clicks away? oh i forgot, you're the smart one.

 

[hondAS2ooo170]

mik3y's correct you noob

 

[w00t]

Mik3y is right, so get on your knees and give mikey and nibble nob job open wide!

 

[nick1985]

Originally posted by: Noob
The X800 doesn't win in points with benchmarks programs. But it wins in FPS tests. Not just for that video card as well.

BONK!


the 6800GT wins 6/8 tests where FPS are measured in different games.

 

[hondAS2ooo170]

Originally posted by: nick1985

Originally posted by: Noob
The X800 doesn't win in points with benchmarks programs. But it wins in FPS tests. Not just for that video card as well.

BONK!


the 6800GT wins 6/8 tests where FPS are measured in different games.

this is also true

 

[bim27142]

first intel vs amd, and now 6800 vs x800...... what's next?...... nforce4 vs 925xe????

 

[imported_Noob]

At the higher resolutions the X800 is better. and when you talk of the 6800 Gt, it is compared to it's equivelant, the X800 Pro, which is a 12 piper.

And about Mik3y. Why would I start a poll ( as Mik3y suggested) if I was asking a question on a very particular aspect? I know which would win. And "You are a noob because you're name is noob" is such a dumb remark. Since I didn't know something makes my or "unkowledged" on particular subject. That doesn't make somebody dumb. It makes them inexperienced. There is a difference. So you can't use that as a comparison

Now when you state such stuff like what Mik3y said, that is stupid. Or lack of intellectual horsepower.

 

[Mik3y]

Originally posted by: bim27142
first intel vs amd, and now 6800 vs x800...... what's next?...... nforce4 vs 925xe????

nah, nforce 4 vs xpress 200.

 

[imported_Noob]

Originally posted by: bim27142
first intel vs amd, and now 6800 vs x800...... what's next?...... nforce4 vs 925xe????

Nah Doom 3 vs. Which is better on which card? JK.

 

[Mik3y]

Originally posted by: Noob
At the higher resolutions the X800 is better. and when you talk of the 6800 Gt, it is compared to it's equivelant, the X800 Pro, which is a 12 piper.

And about Mik3y. Why would I start a poll ( as Mik3y suggested) if I was asking a question on a very particular aspect? I know which would win. And "You are a noob because you're name is noob" is such a dumb remark. Since I didn't know something makes my or "unkowledged" on particular subject. That doesn't make somebody dumb. It makes them inexperienced. There is a difference. So you can't use that as a comparison

Now when you state such stuff like what Mik3y said, that is stupid. Or lack of intellectual horsepower.

i never meant to be offensive in the first place. perhaps i should have added a smiley to show it as an act of exageration? if i didnt say it, somebody else will. why? cuz that happens every time this topic is started.

 

[imported_Noob]

I didn't know know you were kidding. Sorry about the flaming. Nor did I intend for this to become a flaming topic. I thought you were instegating it.

 

[Mik3y]

Originally posted by: Noob
I didn't know know you were kidding. Sorry about the flaming. Nor did I intend for this to become a flaming topic. I thought you were instegating it.

in this case, i'm totally sorry.