AMD or INTEL for video editing system

Lufkin

Member
Aug 14, 2002
43
0
0
My wife's DELL Dimension 8200 finally died. She does a lot of video editing using Adobe Premiere on WinXP Pro. I keep reading that Intel still leads when it comes to rendering but am not sure how the far from top of the line processors stack up. I am tyrying to put together a replacement system for her, for around $500. She will keep her AGP x8 video card and a PCI Video Capture card, but everything else will be scrapped. These are the two sytems I am looking at:

AMD
----------------------------------
GIGABYTE GA-K8NS Ultra-939 Socket 939 NVIDIA nForce3 Ultra $106.00
AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Winchester Model ADA3000BIBOX $146.00
GeIL Value 1GB (2 x 512MB) 184-Pin DDR SDRAM DDR 400 Dual Channel $82.44
2 Western Digital Caviar SE WD800JD 80GB 7200 RPM Serial ATA150 Hard Drives $112.00
Antec SmartPower 2.0 SP-400 ATX12V 400W Power Supply $59.00

TOTAL: $505.44

OR

INTEL
----------------------------------
ASUS P4P800SE Socket 478 Intel 865PE ATX Intel Motherboard $94.00
Intel Pentium 4 3.0E Prescott 800MHz FSB Socket 478 Processor $193.99
GeIL Value 1GB (2 x 512MB) 184-Pin DDR SDRAM DDR 400 Dual Channel $82.44
2 Western Digital Caviar SE WD800JD 80GB 7200 RPM Serial ATA150 Hard Drives $112.00
Antec SmartPower 2.0 SP-400 ATX12V 400W Power Supply $59.00

TOTAL: $541.43

Any clues as to which system would be a better video editing machine? Upgradeability isn't all that important as in 3 years we'll probably be making the move to PCI express and dual core processors...
 

Icopoli

Senior member
Jan 6, 2005
495
0
0
As much of an AMD fanboy that I am, go with the Intel if it's going to be in a workstation environment.
 

Lufkin

Member
Aug 14, 2002
43
0
0
I personally love my old XP 1800+ system that has been rock solid for well over 3 years. It saddens me that AMD hasn't caught up in the rendering dept. as I am cheap and Intel always seems overpriced.
 

peleejosh

Golden Member
Dec 11, 2004
1,521
0
0
i use a p4 3.0 processor paired with a Asus P4C800E deluxe mobo for video editing. It has been rock solid and is very fast. Some of that might be accredited to the Matrox RT.X100.
 
Nov 11, 2004
10,855
0
0
I've seen AMD systems crush Intel systems at the workstation level.
Tyan K8WE
Dual Opteron 275
4GB PC3200 ECC Reg
x700 PCI-E
:)
 

fstime

Diamond Member
Jan 18, 2004
4,382
5
81
Intel rapes at encoding.

Its because of the pipe line.

AMD's is much shorter, giving an advantage in games.

On the other hand, Intels is longer, which allows more "filling space" for encoding.

I'm not sure though.
 
Jun 14, 2003
10,442
0
0
Originally posted by: Kensai
I've seen AMD systems crush Intel systems at the workstation level.
Tyan K8WE
Dual Opteron 275
4GB PC3200 ECC Reg
x700 PCI-E
:)


build me that for 500 bux and u got a deal :D
 

ddogg

Golden Member
May 4, 2005
1,864
361
136
Originally posted by: BouZouki
Intel rapes at encoding.

Its because of the pipe line.

AMD's is much shorter, giving an advantage in games.

On the other hand, Intels is longer, which allows more "filling space" for encoding.

I'm not sure though.

yup....intel does have an upper hand at encoding!! while AMD kicks ass in gaming!! so since ur goin for video editing i would go for Intel
 

Gamingphreek

Lifer
Mar 31, 2003
11,679
0
81
Originally posted by: BouZouki
Intel rapes at encoding.

Its because of the pipe line.

AMD's is much shorter, giving an advantage in games.

On the other hand, Intels is longer, which allows more "filling space" for encoding.

I'm not sure though.

Please show me where Intel "rapes" AMD in video encoding. Even in Divx where intel used to hold a huge lead, AMD has decreased that to almost nothing. AMD even wins in a lot of encoding.

-Kevin