• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

AMD or INTEL for video editing system

Lufkin

Member
My wife's DELL Dimension 8200 finally died. She does a lot of video editing using Adobe Premiere on WinXP Pro. I keep reading that Intel still leads when it comes to rendering but am not sure how the far from top of the line processors stack up. I am tyrying to put together a replacement system for her, for around $500. She will keep her AGP x8 video card and a PCI Video Capture card, but everything else will be scrapped. These are the two sytems I am looking at:

AMD
----------------------------------
GIGABYTE GA-K8NS Ultra-939 Socket 939 NVIDIA nForce3 Ultra $106.00
AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Winchester Model ADA3000BIBOX $146.00
GeIL Value 1GB (2 x 512MB) 184-Pin DDR SDRAM DDR 400 Dual Channel $82.44
2 Western Digital Caviar SE WD800JD 80GB 7200 RPM Serial ATA150 Hard Drives $112.00
Antec SmartPower 2.0 SP-400 ATX12V 400W Power Supply $59.00

TOTAL: $505.44

OR

INTEL
----------------------------------
ASUS P4P800SE Socket 478 Intel 865PE ATX Intel Motherboard $94.00
Intel Pentium 4 3.0E Prescott 800MHz FSB Socket 478 Processor $193.99
GeIL Value 1GB (2 x 512MB) 184-Pin DDR SDRAM DDR 400 Dual Channel $82.44
2 Western Digital Caviar SE WD800JD 80GB 7200 RPM Serial ATA150 Hard Drives $112.00
Antec SmartPower 2.0 SP-400 ATX12V 400W Power Supply $59.00

TOTAL: $541.43

Any clues as to which system would be a better video editing machine? Upgradeability isn't all that important as in 3 years we'll probably be making the move to PCI express and dual core processors...
 
I personally love my old XP 1800+ system that has been rock solid for well over 3 years. It saddens me that AMD hasn't caught up in the rendering dept. as I am cheap and Intel always seems overpriced.
 
i use a p4 3.0 processor paired with a Asus P4C800E deluxe mobo for video editing. It has been rock solid and is very fast. Some of that might be accredited to the Matrox RT.X100.
 
Intel rapes at encoding.

Its because of the pipe line.

AMD's is much shorter, giving an advantage in games.

On the other hand, Intels is longer, which allows more "filling space" for encoding.

I'm not sure though.
 
Originally posted by: BouZouki
Intel rapes at encoding.

Its because of the pipe line.

AMD's is much shorter, giving an advantage in games.

On the other hand, Intels is longer, which allows more "filling space" for encoding.

I'm not sure though.

yup....intel does have an upper hand at encoding!! while AMD kicks ass in gaming!! so since ur goin for video editing i would go for Intel
 
Originally posted by: BouZouki
Intel rapes at encoding.

Its because of the pipe line.

AMD's is much shorter, giving an advantage in games.

On the other hand, Intels is longer, which allows more "filling space" for encoding.

I'm not sure though.

Please show me where Intel "rapes" AMD in video encoding. Even in Divx where intel used to hold a huge lead, AMD has decreased that to almost nothing. AMD even wins in a lot of encoding.

-Kevin
 
Back
Top