Originally posted by: Sunner
Too bad HP don't make any Opteron boxes, but I guess they feel it would be confusing seeing as they already have PA-RISC, Alpha, and IA-64, not to mention it would compete with their Integrity servers.
Maybe IBM...but then, again maybe they're worried it would compete with their POWER offerings.
Oh well, impressive in any case.
I doubt IBM would of lent it's technology to AMD in the first place to make the Opterons if they thought they would be compitition with the power series. They aren't even in the same league....
(SOI used by AMD is from IBM's Power stuff, for instance)
And the Power970's are powerPC platform and are designed specificly for SMP work in lower-power (as in electrical power) and relatively low-temp blade servers were you'll have dozens of blade servers with 2 and 4 way proccessors on a single rack. (which is why single cpu G5 sucks and dual cpu G5 rocks)
Power4/5's are for large scale multiproccessor systems and mainframes. 8, 16, 32-way and above.
Opterons are for low/medium end servers/workstations and the AMD64 stuff is for commodity PC hardware, with the FX stuff thrown in for those that like to spend way to much on a PC. (just kidding.)
Anyways IBM sells plenty of Opteron-based workstations and servers.
It's not nearly as big as a deal as it seems to run different platforms. After all Linux runs on all of them and that's what IBM has been backing lately. You just choose which is best for the job. Power970, Power4, AMD-64/Opteron, all designed for different purposes (and it's funny to see how much IBM/AMD has put intel on the run.). As long as they beat out Intel everybody else (business-wise) wins.