Phynaz
Lifer
Hey, don't shoot the messenger. I'm just reading off the AMD spec sheet. Well, Wikipedia actually.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_FX_microprocessors
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_FX_microprocessors
Performance wise AMD got beaten so badly.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5553/the-xeon-e52600-dual-sandybridge-for-servers
Bulldozer failed everywhere for everything.
Full load clocks are 100Mhz higher. Who cares about clocks for an idle CPU? AMD tried tried that one when they intentionally lowered the base clocks to be able to say they had more turbo. Nobody fell for that marketing tactic.
Hey, don't shoot the messenger. I'm just reading off the AMD spec sheet. Well, Wikipedia actually.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_FX_microprocessors
Get your facts straight,
Intel 32nm Gulftown XEON release date March 2010
AMD 32nm Interlagos (Opteron 62xx) release date November 2011
Intel 32nm Sandybridge XEON release date March 2012
AMD 32nm Delhi (Opteron 63xx) release date December 2012
Intel 22nm Ivybridge XEON release date September 2013
Get your facts straight,
Intel 32nm Gulftown XEON release date March 2010
AMD 32nm Interlagos (Opteron 62xx) release date November 2011
Intel 32nm Sandybridge XEON release date March 2012
AMD 32nm Delhi (Opteron 63xx) release date December 2012
Intel 22nm Ivybridge XEON release date September 2013
FX8150 and FX8350 have the same Vcore, 1.425V
Full load clocks with 8 cores are 3.6 and 4.0 respectively, if there was only 100MHZ the Mthreaded benches wouldnt look like this, although you are free to keep believing your own lies :
Okay, then CPU design can increase efficiency by 10% or more?
GloFo EUV nodes are 22-nm/16-nm/10-nm. This is not to be confused with half pitches.We consider two potential PIM design points geared towards high-performance applications, one in 22nm technology and another in 16nm technology.