AMD Hires John Gustafson as Chief Graphics Product Architect

AtenRa

Lifer
Feb 2, 2009
14,001
3,357
136
AMD Hires John Gustafson as Chief Graphics Product Architect
35-year Industry Veteran with Extensive Background in Parallel Computing Will Focus on Defining Future of AMD Graphics Solutions

SUNNYVALE, Calif. —8/28/2012

AMD (NYSE: AMD) announced today that the visionary behind Gustafson’s Law, John Gustafson, has joined the company as senior fellow and chief product architect, Graphics Business Unit. In this role, Gustafson will set the technical vision for the AMD graphics business unit, driving the technology roadmap and platform for the AMD Radeon™ and AMD FirePro™ product lines as well as new technology planning and execution of business objectives. Gustafson will be based in Sunnyvale and will help evangelize AMD graphics leadership internally and externally.


Gustafson is a 35-year veteran of the computing industry. He joins AMD from Intel, where he headed the company's eXtreme Technologies Lab, conducting cutting-edge research on energy-efficient computing and memory, as well as optical, energy and storage technologies. Prior to that, he served as CEO at Massively Parallel Technologies and CTO at ClearSpeed Technology, a high-performance computing company. Gustafson has also held key management and research positions at numerous companies including Sun Microsystems, Ames Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drazick

Borealis7

Platinum Member
Oct 19, 2006
2,914
205
106
taking a high-ranking guy like this from Intel, if they're not careful, they'll get slapped with Patent Infringement suits from Intel for the work he's done there.
 

Borealis7

Platinum Member
Oct 19, 2006
2,914
205
106
is it also for patents that came out of the "eXtreme labs" or only for products that made it into the consumer/enterprise space? i'm pretty sure it doesnt cover Intel's "secret research" which he was part of.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
30,449
8,111
136
is it also for patents that came out of the "eXtreme labs" or only for products that made it into the consumer/enterprise space? i'm pretty sure it doesnt cover Intel's "secret research" which he was part of.

If it's secret it not likely to be in a patent.
 

Rvenger

Elite Member <br> Super Moderator <br> Video Cards
Apr 6, 2004
6,283
5
81
Is this why AMD was cleaning house? So they can afford guys like this?
 

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,118
58
91
taking a high-ranking guy like this from Intel, if they're not careful, they'll get slapped with Patent Infringement suits from Intel for the work he's done there.

You are probably thinking of Trade Secrets, not patent infringement, here.

That is an issue anytime any employee changes employers, true enough. But the burden of providing evidence/proof would fall to Intel.

AMD doesn't have to defend itself until Intel attempts to argue a case that trade secrets have been divulged.

The proof that Intel would need to prove this would come from products that make it into the marketplace. Typical new product cycle time is 3-4 yrs.

So at best AMD has nothing to worry about for 3-4 yrs. But that assumes they wanted to hire him for his trade secrets, which is doubtful.

At that level of management you aren't hiring people for what they know (in terms of specifics on your competition), that is what you hire engineers for (individual contributors that were creating those specifics for your competitor)...rather, you hire managers at that level because of what they can do for you - manage large groups of people effectively and deliver on corporate strategies that are already set in stone.

I remember one time we hired a high level manager from Intel from their Flash division (this was a long time ago, mid-90s), but we didn't hire him to tell us how to make our flash better like Intel's flash. We hired him because we knew he knew how to create a world-class organization which in turn could/would be capable of developing and creating world-class flash products 5-10 yrs down the road.

AMD probably hired this guy with the same thinking, and that is why Intel won't bother to spend the money on lawyer salaries worrying about it. By the time AMD could get a product to market that would leverage any of the trade secret info inside this guy's head, Intel will already have moved 4 yrs ahead of that trade secret info on their own in the meantime. But they probably aren't so happy over losing an effective high-level manager.
 

Borealis7

Platinum Member
Oct 19, 2006
2,914
205
106
right, thank you IDC.

given this guy's academic resume i think they want him to dictate the direction a line of products is going to take, like a CTO, rather than actually manage people, and they've positioned him in the graphics department because of his "intimate knowledge" of parallelism.