AMD HD 6950 -> 7970 Ghz Ed. Worth it?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

WhoBeDaPlaya

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2000
7,415
404
126
AMD's roadmap shows no desktop HD8000 cards until at least Q4 2013. The official roadmap only has HD7000 to end of Q3 2013.
WTH? When did this happen? I somehow had it in my mind that the desktop HD8000 release was imminent (well, something like early Q2).

Not that I'm complaining. My 7970 will hold its value for that much longer :D
 

badb0y

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2010
4,015
30
91
WTH? When did this happen? I somehow had it in my mind that the desktop HD8000 release was imminent (well, something like early Q2).

Not that I'm complaining. My 7970 will hold its value for that much longer :D

They never announced it was coming we just had rumors.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
Ya, that's a good point.

AMD never actually stated when they planned to launch desktop HD8000 series in 2013.

2013-Roadmap.png

AMD_Client_APU_GPU_Roadmap-550x307.jpg


Now they simply clarified that HD7000 desktop cards will probably be their focus until Q3 2014. That still leaves Q4 2013 for them to launch their successor. We should get more details soon.
 

aaksheytalwar

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2012
3,389
0
76
A stock 6950 to 7970 ghz stock is like nearly twice the performance in several intensive situations. Or at least 80%+.
 

dagamer34

Platinum Member
Aug 15, 2005
2,591
0
71
Looking at his specs, he seems he doesn't overclock. In that case, it seems wasteful to get Sapphire VaporX over 1Ghz HD7970 Windforce since you are spending $50 for a 3-4% performance difference.

Every now and then I enable OC Genie on my MSI board to auto overclock my CPU to ~4.2Ghz, but I don't think I've ever seen a real difference so I turn it off. Then again, I've never really benchmarked my system. The last taxing game I played was Crysis 2 (pre-DX11 and high res texture pack) and it performed rather smoothly so I didn't worry too much about it.

I'm not a super heavy gamer and could probably just wait it out until Q4 and catch up on other PC games (I still need to play the Mass Effect Trilogy). I'd hate to have a GTX 680 situation occur if the HD 8000 series were to launch next year and I have to wait a month or two more until April 2014 just to avoid price gouging (in which case I would rather have bought now).

No one has a crystal ball, do they? That would make this much easier. :whiste:
 

raghu78

Diamond Member
Aug 23, 2012
4,093
1,476
136
OP you are not going to get better price performance than a HD 7950 boost at USD 300. 925 mhz boost clocks. easily overclocks to 1100 mhz at stock voltage and matches HD 7970 Ghz (1050 mhz). at the same clocks HD 7950 is 3 - 6% slower than HD 7970.

even the next gen GTX 760 Ti (most probably a GTX 680 or equivalent perf product) or HD 8870 when they release won't be faster than a HD 7950 when considering overclocked performance at similar clocks.

on average HD 7950(1100 Mhz) would be close to 75 - 80% faster than stock HD 6950 and 60 - 65% faster than hevaily overclocked HD 6950(925 mhz) . in modern DX11 games like BF3, Crysis 3, Farcry 3 you would easily be at more than 2x the perf of HD 6950.
 

Jhatfie

Senior member
Jan 20, 2004
749
2
81
I went from a OC'd 6950 to a OC'd 7950 and it was a night and day improvement. Close to double in some games. I personally would just get a good 7950 for $280-ish AR and OC the crap out of it. Save some $$ compared to a 7970 and get similar performance.
 

FalseChristian

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2002
3,322
0
71
The GTX 460 1GB is the most future-proof GPU ever made. I've got 2 of them in SLI at 840/1680/4200. I've had them for over 2 1/2 years and they can play FarCry 3 and Crysis great albeit at 1680x1050.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
The GTX 460 1GB is the most future-proof GPU ever made. I've got 2 of them in SLI at 840/1680/4200. I've had them for over 2 1/2 years and they can play FarCry 3 and Crysis great albeit at 1680x1050.

The 460 is what it is. All that being able to still use them effectively means is games haven't progressed that much. People who bought 2 5870's almost a year before the 460's came out feel the same as you do.
 

sze5003

Lifer
Aug 18, 2012
14,320
683
126
Now that my card is payed off I'm interested in the 8 series. I too would wait for prices to equal what I payed for my current card. Thing is I haven't needed to oc my card currently to max out any game I play. I dunno if I would go back to Nvidia this time around. Maybe if prices were better but that's unlikely. I researched the crap out of both AMD and nvidia before I decided and I have to say I got the top end card at the time where the price made much more sense.
 

Rhezuss

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2006
4,118
34
91
Hell it sure worth it!
Just upgraded my 6950 unlocked to a 7950 and it'shugely noticeable.

I can now crank up details and have butter smooth FPS.

This 7xxx series is awesome.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
Now that my card is payed off I'm interested in the 8 series. I too would wait for prices to equal what I payed for my current card. Thing is I haven't needed to oc my card currently to max out any game I play. I dunno if I would go back to Nvidia this time around. Maybe if prices were better but that's unlikely. I researched the crap out of both AMD and nvidia before I decided and I have to say I got the top end card at the time where the price made much more sense.

:thumbsup: It's really hard to ignore this feature once you tried it and got the hang of it. Sure at first it might not sound like a big deal but then you get another $500 GPU for free and then another. Next thing you know you end up going from HD4000 to HD7000 series for $0. The alternative NV path would have cost thousands of dollars. I still remember my 4890 making > 1 BTC per day. ^_^
 

sze5003

Lifer
Aug 18, 2012
14,320
683
126
Oh lol I haven't even started bit mining I should look into it. It didn't even take long to pay my newegg cc I could have bought the card outright but I felt lazy.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
I meant April 2014 if the HD 8000 series launches next year.

If you don't mind waiting a full year, doesn't that mean your current videocard's performance is still sufficient enough for your needs? I think ultimately you should upgrade when your GPU is too slow for your needs if that's your primary motivation. Otherwise, it's pretty difficult to time the market as new stuff comes out all the time, prices drop. If you get HD7000 cards now, they are cheaper than their launch prices. Whatever new generation of GPUs will be out in April 2014, the launch prices will be higher than today's market prices of HD7000 cards. You'll also have faster performance. What I mean is you'll have to comprise something, price/performance or total performance in the immediate future no matter which way you go. That's why cards like HD7950 + OC are nice since they let you upgrade on the cheap and still have $ left over for the next upgrade rather than spending $430+ on a flagship GPU that's just 10% faster.
 

blastingcap

Diamond Member
Sep 16, 2010
6,654
5
76
:thumbsup: It's really hard to ignore this feature once you tried it and got the hang of it. Sure at first it might not sound like a big deal but then you get another $500 GPU for free and then another. Next thing you know you end up going from HD4000 to HD7000 series for $0. The alternative NV path would have cost thousands of dollars. I still remember my 4890 making > 1 BTC per day. ^_^

GPU mining is on its way out and there is no way in hell that anyone getting into mining today will ever recoup their card's cost, especially after rewards were halved in November 2012 (though the price of BTC has risen lately so as to basically offset that halving). ASICs have already started to be shipped, and I would not be surprised if difficulty quadrupled by March and then quadrupled again by April.

Your calculations were made a time when mining difficulty was much lower and with cheap hydroelectric power. I would consider bitcoin mining to be a nonfactor in selecting a video card today.
 
Last edited:

OS

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
15,581
1
76
my previous setup i had a phenom II x4 965, dual 6950s and now FX6300, single 7870 and just casual gaming crysis 2 on an HDTV, it feels the same to me surprisingly.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
Your calculations were made a time when mining difficulty was much lower and with cheap hydroelectric power. I would consider bitcoin mining to be a nonfactor in selecting a video card today.

You said all of those same things in September and October of last year. 2 HD7970s are making $150, or > $100 net of electricity a month. Add in game bundles and BTC still being profitable for at least 1 months+, it makes them a no brainer choice right now.
 

blastingcap

Diamond Member
Sep 16, 2010
6,654
5
76
You said all of those same things in September and October of last year. 2 HD7970s are making $150, or > $100 net of electricity a month. Add in game bundles and BTC still being profitable for at least 1 months+, it makes them a no brainer choice right now.

No, I said that GPU mining was fast coming to unprofitability with halving + ASIC. The difference is that the halving has happened, and ASICs have started to ship. If BTC hadn't doubled in value, we wouldn't even be having this discussion, it would be clear that GPU mining era was basically over. But you can't count on BTC to stay at current values. It can collapse or go up; it's a gamble. (Btw if you are so sure that BTC will keep climbing in price, it's better to buy BTC directly than mine. Same thing last October--if you were sooooo sure that BTC would rise in price you would have been better off buying coins instead of cards. So you lucked out. Don't try to tell me that you foresaw prices doubling since October, because if you were so sure about it you would have bought coins directly.)

In fact, the most you can hope for is that ASICs take a while to ship in bulk but given that even a single Avalon ASIC is the equivalent of several DOZEN 7970s and BFL and others are going to ship soon too, the writing is on the wall. GPU mining really is about to come to a close and no amount of obfuscation on your part is going to change that.

You're encouraging people to buy AMD cards because you can mine on them, saying that yours paid for themselves, while completely and utterly ignoring the above and how you are using numbers from last year. Even your current talk about how a pair nets $100 after electricity is disingenuous because you get much lower rates than most people in N. America and are assuming difficulty stays the same--which it WILL NOT DO. You can't simply pretend ASICs aren't literally on a boat from China right now and as they get powered up over the course of the next month we WILL be seeing their effects on difficulty.

In fact you can see yourself: http://www.bitcoinx.com/profit/ Input 350W (typical because CPU, mobo, drives, RAM, etc. take energy too, not just the card), 0.10 electric rates at $25/BTC and current difficulty (which is about to go up by the way) at 600 MHash/s. You get 2.28 revenue against .84 power costs per day, or about $43 per month. Not exactly earth-shattering... and this assumes difficulty stays as low as it is. When bulk shipments of ASICs hit, you can bet difficulty goes way, way up. There's also no guarantee coins stay at current value; they may collapse at any time or shoot upwards.

So what can you count on if you buy a 7970 today, maybe like $50 at best over the next month or so until the profits simply aren't there? But NVDA cards are more power-efficient so they will save you money over the entire life of the card, which reduces that $50 number down to something significantly less than $50. In other words, bitcoin mining is a minor factor. I will grant you that mining is not literally a nonfactor. But I would not consider it much of a factor. NVDA also gives you smoother framerates and CUDA, PhysX, and better long-term support. That last part is a growing concern because AMD as a company is losing money like crazy and may go bankrupt. It might not liquidate (Ch. 7), but even a Ch. 11 re-org doesn't bode well for long-term driver support and stuff like that.

All of the above is optimistic unless you live in a cheap-power area. People have lights, turn on microwaves, have TVs, phones, radios, garages, refrigerators, and more, so chances are, the typical person adding ~350W of continuous load to their profile will likely be sent up another tier or two in rates. Here in Northern California where I live, tier 3 means something like 30 cents/kWh. Plug that into the calculator and you get a net loss of 22 cents per day every day.

I was talking about mining and specifically mining, you are bringing up game bundles. I said mining is a nonfactor. I said nothing about game bundles.

I've been away from this subforum for a while and was curious why you are now known as an AMD shill/fanboy. I'm not curious anymore.
 
Last edited:

KingFatty

Diamond Member
Dec 29, 2010
3,034
1
81
So what can you count on if you buy a 7970 today, maybe like $50 at best over the next month or so until the profits simply aren't there? But NVDA cards are more power-efficient so they will save you money over the entire life of the card, which reduces that $50 number down to something significantly less than $50.

Do we have some calculations that can show the approximate dollar savings per month for running Nvidia compared to AMD?
 

blastingcap

Diamond Member
Sep 16, 2010
6,654
5
76
Do we have some calculations that can show the approximate dollar savings per month for running Nvidia compared to AMD?

It'd vary a lot depending on your usage pattern and electric bill, but for most online games when both are tested for wattage, Kepler is more efficient. That's at-load though.

At idle I used to think they were about the same but it actually can vary depending on the card. During blu-ray/youtube playback I think Kepler is more efficient again but once again it may vary.

The difference is minimal but if you multiply it over the course of say, 3 years, it could add up enough to partially or even wholly offset whatever mining one can eke out between now and the ASIC-driven difficulty surge, depending on how one pays for electricity (Seattle hydroelectric-driven power is a lot cheaper than, say, oil-fired generation in Hawaii... that's like 5 cents/kWh vs. 50 cents/kWh just going by the first tier rates... the difference is even bigger as you go up tiers).

He's a lot more vendor agnostic than you are,that's for sure and his opinions carry more weight.:colbert:

New readers on this subforum should be made aware of how many times you've been vacationed/temporarily banned for pro-AMD trolling. Look at your post history. (click on someone's picture, then "find more posts by ______"). Feel free to look at mine as well. I have nothing to hide, despite your ridiculous accusation. As for whose opinion carrying more weight, I'm sure his pro-AMD posts carry more weight with you, given how many times you've been vacationed/temporarily banned here for pro-AMD trolling.
 
Last edited:

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
I have some concerns about mining.

First and foremost, wear and tear.

Secondly, my usage model is at best 8 hours a day to mine. The rest of the time I'm either on the PC or too busy watching a monster child to care about setting it up.

Given the example of $50 a month for a 7970, I'd be looking at closer to $16, which comes out to ~50 cents a day. I'd have a better return if I decided to go Titan and F@H to cure cancer for an hour a day while I went out and collected pop cans... I'd probably feel better about it, and pop cans aren't going up in difficulty either >.<


Lastly, refresh. REFRESH. They're coming!
 

richprice79

Junior Member
Dec 18, 2012
15
0
66
I picked up a 7970 due to the free games and I have to say i am very happy with it. It doubled my frame rate in every game compared to my 5850. One thing I am curious of is I used my coupon for Crysis 3 and Bioshock and it said they would email me the keys once the games are released. I was hoping to have steam download C3 as soon as it drops so when i get home from work its ready on release day.

Now here we are on 02/14 and still no key emailed yet, so i guess they really are waiting until actual release date to email me the key. Has anyone received their Crysis 3 key yet? :confused: