i don't understand most of this, but would not be a advantageous time to invest? i can't imagine the stock would go much lower.
Many people said that about GM a couple years ago too....
i don't understand most of this, but would not be a advantageous time to invest? i can't imagine the stock would go much lower.
i don't understand most of this, but would not be a advantageous time to invest? i can't imagine the stock would go much lower.
i don't understand most of this, but would not be a advantageous time to invest? i can't imagine the stock would go much lower.
Definition of 'Value Trap'
A stock that appears to be cheap because the stock has been trading at low multiples of earnings, cash flow or book value for an extended time period. Stock traps attract investors who are looking for a bargain because these stocks are inexpensive. The trap springs when investors buy into the company at low prices and the stock never improves. Trading that occurs at low multiples of earnings, cash flow or book value for long periods of time might indicate that the company or the entire sector is in trouble, and that stock prices may not move higher.
Investopedia explains 'Value Trap'
Companies, and even sectors, can be doomed, because of situations such as the inability to survive competition, the inability to generate substantial and consistent profits, the lack of new products or earnings growth, or ineffective management. Often, a value trap appears to be such a good deal that investors become confused when the stock fails to perform. As with any investment decision, thorough research and evaluation is recommended before investing in any company that appears cheap when reviewing its relevant performance metrics.
maybe they should just focus on 1 or 2 products, get back to basics. or is it too late for that?
IDC\Pablo\MrMt:
Given the great discussions lately on analyzing AMD's behavior and the news surrounding it's strategy - would you accept jobs at AMD?
Looking at the hiring for a Technical Fellow to lead the wireless IP field - what would really attract the so called fine design talent that AMD has locked in the basement?
People whom design these things aren't exactly daft simple folk.
They must see the writing on the wall - even with the limited information availeble.
So why do people sign up to the boat now?
Why does that fantastic design talent not jump ship?
i don't understand most of this, but would not be a advantageous time to invest? i can't imagine the stock would go much lower.
I think that is what Rory is now attempting. The problem being, of course, that you cannot get back to the basics and still have just those basics generating enough revenue to pay all the bills that 10,000 employees create.
Good find, that's preposterous. These guys are moving the chairs on the titanic.
i don't understand most of this, but would not be a advantageous time to invest? i can't imagine the stock would go much lower.
People said the same at 20$, 10$, 8$, 5$, 3$, 2$. And the fools kept losing their money. Now the stock is 1.8$ and still dropping without any hope of recovery ahead.
Plus stockowners are the first ones to lose everything.
Lookup value trap.
Still, if one wanted to speculate, at the price AMD is now, if it can survive, I would think it would reach 8-10 dollars at some point.
You have a point about the "value trap", although some investors have made a fortune purchasing undervalued stocks. (See Warren Buffet). The thing is though, they tried to purchase "undervalued" stocks that had solid fundamentals, which obviously AMD does not have, i.e. an inferior product in a flat or declining market, and too much debt.
Still, if one wanted to speculate, at the price AMD is now, if it can survive, I would think it would reach 8-10 dollars at some point.
Not saying AMD is in any way comparable to Apple, but one might have called Apple a "value trap" when it was in freefall some years ago too, but look where it is now. The difference is they had a visionary leader (whether you liked him or not), and came out with an innovative product.
Also, with them having a market cap of $1.3 billion now it makes them look very cheap considering the fact that they paid over $5 billion for ATi alone several years ago
I can see why a lot of people would want to jump on AMD's stock. If you look at its price history, it has gone this low before and then it jumped way up over time.
Also, with them having a market cap of $1.3 billion now it makes them look very cheap considering the fact that they paid over $5 billion for ATi alone several years ago.
I realize that they have $2 billion in debt, but even with that included they are cheaper than only ATi was worth some time ago.
I can see why a lot of people would want to jump on AMD's stock. If you look at its price history, it has gone this low before and then it jumped way up over time.
Also, with them having a market cap of $1.3 billion now it makes them look very cheap considering the fact that they paid over $5 billion for ATi alone several years ago.
I realize that they have $2 billion in debt, but even with that included they are cheaper than only ATi was worth some time ago.
People keep saying AMD is going bankrupt but I'm sure that they have options to avoid that, such as selling their intellectual property, or laying off most of their workforce while continuing to sell products for profit.
A small team of their best engineers. That's all it took for Intel to bounce back from the P4.And who is going to develop the new products?
A small team of their best engineers. That's all it took for Intel to bounce back from the P4.
A small team of their best engineers. That's all it took for Intel to bounce back from the P4.
Well at the very least, they should not have large teams of engineers working on Piledriver or Steamroller. Bulldozer should have been fully scrapped. They could have stuck with Llano cores for the time being.Uh, you think it was a "small team" that developed Conroe?
It takes a small team to develop the Via Nano or a TI-86 calculator chip.
It takes a medium team (1700) to develop something like TI's ARM-based OMAP, Nvidia's Denver, Intel Atom or AMD Jaguar.
It takes a large team (3000-5000) to develop something like AMD's Steamroller or Intel's Haswell.
There is a reason practically every other company that has an x86 license opted to drop out of that rat-race long ago.
It takes a serious financial and headcount commitment, over a prolonged time period of at least 4 yrs, to come up with a complex modern IC for today's advanced process nodes and the complexity/expense is not going down anytime soon.
Well at the very least, they should not have large teams of engineers working on Piledriver or Steamroller. Bulldozer should have been fully scrapped. They could have stuck with Llano cores for the time being.
Their management is completely inept. They might as well start cutting from the top down and just keep their most talented engineers.
In any event, it was a smaller team that developed Conroe in comparison to the division that created the P4.
If it only requires a medium sized team to develop an advanced ARM core, perhaps they should go that route for the time being.
