Discussion AMD FSR vs Nvidia DLSS2.0 vs Temporal Super Resolution (TSR)

[Kedas]

"Edge of Eternity" is one of the first games that have FSR and DLSS I assume.
This is an interesting interview with the game developer about the difference between both.
It looks indeed that the difference between FSR and DLSS may not be worth it to implement both.

Edge of Eternity Tech Q&A - Midgar CEO on AMD FSR vs NVIDIA DLSS, PS5 vs XSX and More

We interviewed Midgar CEO Jérémy Zeler-Maury, also the Lead Programmer on Edge of Eternity, one of the first games to support FSR and DLSS.

wccftech.com

Cost to add it

I think FSR being very easy to integrate means more games are going to get it, DLSS is more complicated to integrate.

Quality

Quality-wise, when there is a lot of pixel info available for upscaling to 4K, both technologies give amazing results, and I have a hard time seeing differences between them. I’d even say that I slightly prefer the FSR for 4K resolution since it doesn’t introduce any artifacts/minor blurriness that DLSS can sometimes introduce. For lower resolutions like upscaling to 1080p or 720p, I think DLSS gives a better result since it can reconstruct parts of missing details due to the nature of the technique.

I didn't expect him to say this below, since now people assume DLSS2.0 is still always better:

I slightly prefer the FSR for 4K resolution since it doesn’t introduce any artifacts/minor blurriness that DLSS can sometimes introduce

From another interview with AMD it was clear they were already busy with FSR2.0
I wonder if this will have time involved because that introduces artifacts, so may be harder to get right, certainly if you compare it to a good FSR 1.0
The likely comment for FSR2.0 will then probably be: looks a bit better than FSR1.0 but has sometimes extra artifacts.

 

[psolord]

I did a quick fsr test in Chernobylite, on my tertiary system with 7950+2500k, if anyone cares (non monetized channel-just for fun).

The performance improvement was great. Lying in bed when I did this (~4m from the 40'' screen), I couldn't even see the image quality difference. Up close however, it was quite lacking.

 

[Abwx]

Test at Computerbase using a 6600XT and a 3060, FPS and image comparisons.

AMD FSR vs. Nvidia DLSS in Edge Of Eternity

Edge Of Eternity unterstützt sowohl AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) als auch Nvidia DLSS. Beide Upscaling-Technologien im Vergleich.

www.computerbase.de

 

[blckgrffn]

Test at Computerbase using a 6600XT and a 3060, FPS and image comparisons.

AMD FSR vs. Nvidia DLSS in Edge Of Eternity

Edge Of Eternity unterstützt sowohl AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) als auch Nvidia DLSS. Beide Upscaling-Technologien im Vergleich.

www.computerbase.de

Are there any juicy verdicts?

 

[Abwx]

Are there any juicy verdicts?

What is to be retained is that native resolution has still better quality, with no advantage for FSR or DLSS, and more surprisingly that it is CPU limited at 1440p even with those mainstream cards despite using a 5950X.

https://translate.google.com/transl...2021-08/amd-fsr-nvidia-dlss-edge-of-eternity/

[/URL]

https://translate.google.com/transl...2021-08/amd-fsr-nvidia-dlss-edge-of-eternity/

[/URL]

 

[BFG10K]

Now added to RPCS3 PlayStation 3 emulator: https://hothardware.com/news/rpcs3-playstation-3-emulator-amd-fsr-support

We won't be adding DLSS. DLSS is a temporal solution that requires per-object motion vectors, which we do not have. FSR is a spatial solution, which is ideal for us. Fortunately, the one that we can and do support is also the one that supports the most GPUs, so everyone wins.