Don't know if this was posted here but I think it's an interesting subject. It would be even better if AMD representatives could chime in and give their two cents.
PC World said:http://www.pcworld.com/article/2052...ion-to-so-publicly-dump-amd-video-cards-.html
Jon Bach, president and founder of Seattles Puget Systems, provided a cornucopia of reliability data culled from testing of 5698 units. Heres what he had to say via email:
It is hard to quantify customer experience, but one thing I can quantify is reliability. How many have failed? Heres a report from the last 3 years.
Nvidia: 5.36% total failures (in our testing + in the field)
AMD: 8.89% total failures (in our testing + in the field)
But more important than failure rate is how many failed in our customer hands? We do a lot of testing here to weed out as many bad cards as possible in our build process. Heres how many have failed in the field over the last 3 years:
Nvidia: 2.42% failures in the field
AMD: 3.23% failures in the field
Heres that same info, over the last 1 year only:
Nvidia: 4.95% total failures (in our testing + in the field)
AMD: 7.79% total failures (in our testing + in the field)
Nvidia: 1.02% failures in the field
AMD: 3.25% failures in the field
So yes, AMD does have a higher failure rate, but nothing that puts up such a big red flag that I would want to drop their product.