• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

AMD drool factor :)

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: myocardia
Originally posted by: NMDante
Not to rain on anyone's parade, but it's a picture of a chip.
Actually, if you'll look at that picture closely, it sure does seem to be PhotoShopped.😉

I wasn't implying that it's not real, don't get me wrong. But a picture of CPU and a picture of a CPU actually working are two different creatures.

I can say I have a quad-core, get an ES sample chip with some weird code, and post it claiming that it's the newest, greatest quad-core with all the bells and whistles.

I'd like to see a screenshot of WinXP or something running, and maybe even CPU-Z stating it's unknown or the code name of AMD's 65nm. Something more solid than CPU pictures.
 
AMD said in their quaterly results CC that their next generation core (K10 was implyed) and quad-core would debute with a new Opteron product first half of 2007.
 
I wont be building a new computer for about 15 months, since I'll be out of the country. Guess I'll have to come back to a quadcore.
 
Originally posted by: ModernMarxist
AMD said in their quaterly results CC that their next generation core (K10 was implyed) and quad-core would debute with a new Opteron product first half of 2007.

K10 was cancelled in 2005 - at least in the state it was in at the time. They could reuse the name I suppose.

 
Back
Top