soccerballtux
Lifer
- Dec 30, 2004
- 12,553
- 2
- 76
You get better than GTX 560 Ti performance out of an HD 7850, so it doesn't need to be that cheap...That $210-230 range sounds just about right and they're already headed in that direction. The HD 7870 should definitely be in that $300-320 range. Considering there is one card of each type on Newegg close to those prices, I think of that as a silent acknowledgement.Between the 7850 being the great overclocker it is, and the 7950 only $40-$50 more, the 7870 is between a rock and a hard place.
Once NVidia releases their 6 series cards, hopefully AMD will cut the prices on the 7850 and 7870. If the NVidia mid ranges are anything like the 680 was to the 7970, they will undercut the AMD offerings and force AMD to drop prices to stay competitive.
Between the 7850 being the great overclocker it is, and the 7950 only $40-$50 more, the 7870 is between a rock and a hard place.
Once NVidia releases their 6 series cards, hopefully AMD will cut the prices on the 7850 and 7870. If the NVidia mid ranges are anything like the 680 was to the 7970, they will undercut the AMD offerings and force AMD to drop prices to stay competitive.
How is it too much? It's the same speed as the 6850 and the same price, with the bonus of lower power consumption.
You could get a GTX 460 for $130 in October of 2010. 18 months out from that, why does a card that doesn't even match its performance cost $10 more?
28nm is more expensive that's for sure. But while a few % difference in power usage isn't that important the 460 uses twice the power:
_______________________2D Idle____3D Max load
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460____16.8W____132.1W
ATI Radeon HD 7770_______11.0W_____67.2W
Not really relevant. For most people that will cost what, $10 a year extra if that?
28nm may be expensive, but that's AMD's problem not the consumers - it's up to them to release a competitive product that we will want to buy.
28nm is more expensive that's for sure. But while a few % difference in power usage isn't that important the 460 uses twice the power:
But with power, the difference I'm more interested in is the extra noise and having to have a bigger PSU.
These cuts are coming along quite nicely:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814102982
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814161399
That Sapphire's got a pretty good cooler as well...
Not really relevant. For most people that will cost what, $10 a year extra if that?
28nm may be expensive, but that's AMD's problem not the consumers - it's up to them to release a competitive product that we will want to buy.
These cuts are coming along quite nicely:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814102982
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814161399
That Sapphire's got a pretty good cooler as well...
Early bird gets the worm at the cost of sleep.
I said I wouldn't cry when the new price cuts rolled in...I said I wouldn't...
That could have been mine if only I waited 1 more month AND $100 less then what I paid! :'(
Hehe, I just ordered a Sapphire. That thing's pretty boss! ^_^
You could get a GTX 460 for $130 in October of 2010. 18 months out from that, why does a card that doesn't even match its performance cost $10 more?
So many factors...
For one, the 460 was $199 in Oct 2010.
http://www.techpowerup.com/133109/N...60-and-GTX-470-to-Counter-HD-6800-Threat.html
There are others, but nobody ever listens to my arguments anyway. They just go on and on about how they want things to be in magic fairy land, where the magic smoke is free.
----
Surprised AMD didn't cut the 7870 with these. The 7850 was a good deal, but the 7870 was poor from the get go. Now it's a terrible deal no matter which way you look at it. Just a matter of time for more cuts...
