I still don't really trust OBR, but if he is telling the truth, why all these teasers? He's still breaking NDA, but not releasing any useful information. My feeling is that these are all fake. It's too easy to fake this kind of stuff, and nobody could ever even have any proof because he hasn't released any actual information.
In God We Trust, Others Must Show Verifiable Benchys.![]()
I dunno. That last figure before PI value output -> pi data.txt still starts with a 1 and it's not in the position of a single but a double digit. If it's that OC'd and still scoring over 10s it seems to my relatively uneducated in the ways of superpi mind that this is still a CPU that's going to have to work its silicon off to match even a 2500K let alone an SB-E/IB. But then again, that's just my humble opinion.
Make sure to include AVX and FMA too.yes.
I think with these multithreaded chips benching wprime 32m would be useful to know.
Also rewriting superpi to handle these double-sized FPUs.
AMD has been late so many times (at least it seems like that) releasing their new line of processors that it's become inexcusable. In fact it would not surprise me if we only see actual volume of Bulldozer around Christmas time.:thumbsup: Couldn't have said it better. Over @ HardOCP I've heard the date is Sept 6th D:
http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1037454153&postcount=184
Sure it's probably real...there are no benchmark figures shown (do they suck that bad?) and that's hardly proof of being stable! Let it run OCCT or Linpack overnight and then maybe...MAYBE we'll talk!
Otherwise that basically proves nothing that we cannot already do with stuff we can buy now. D:
