- Aug 10, 2010
- 368
- 0
- 0
http://www.fudzilla.com/graphics/graphics/graphics/amd-barts-xt-card-pixellized
You can read more about it here.


You can read more about it here.
More pressing is the dual PCI-e power connectors, suggesting above or close to 150w power consumption.
Aye, but it is quite common for an engineering sample to have much more possible power than required no? Didn't the first juniper cards demonstrating eyefinity also have dual 6pin?
Everything about this kind of screams "sample card" to me. I've heard ATI is moving towards vapour chambers though (S/A forum rumours) for most of the mid end and up. This does not look like a vapour chamber to me (if it is it could explain the "crappy" look of it) but it is hard to tell.
I'm going to wager it comes to market in the dual 6pin configuration. It may even require as much or a little more power than a GTX 460 if the early leaks and rumors are true about it being faster than the 460.
Thing looks very dusty for a "new" card.
Looks like that cooler was designed by coolermaster like a lot of AMDs past stock CPU coolers. Check the fan blade design, only CM uses those right now afaik. Looks kind of wimpy though compared to the stock on the 5850, maybe the count about a vapor chamber design was spot on? Or is it possible they just skimped on cooling cause it's an ES
That is a weird sample. Why would they locate VRMs on the opposite side of power connectors?![]()
That's actually kinda exciting to me. I'm tired of GPUs spewing their heat out into my case. I want it all exhausted out the back.
Looks like that cooler was designed by coolermaster like a lot of AMDs past stock CPU coolers. Check the fan blade design, only CM uses those right now afaik. Looks kind of wimpy though compared to the stock on the 5850, maybe the count about a vapor chamber design was spot on? Or is it possible they just skimped on cooling cause it's an ES
but if they're already so hot then cooling them is more difficult already. best benefit I can see is that it is close to the exit and thus less of the heat pollutes your case.
Have AMD used a reference design like that before ? I know I've seen that on custom cards, I can't remember seeing it on a reference card though.
The air in most dual slot configurations enters at the far end from the ports and exits through the vent above the ports. The cooling effectiveness is related to the temperature of this air as it passes over any given heat sink. Since the VRMs can accommodate a higher temperature their ambients can be higher for any given cooling system. So you might save a degree or two (depending on cooling system) by ensuring the coolest air arrives at the more temperature sensitive GPU.
The position does not affect heat dumped into the case if they use the same cooler as last time around. All of the air should be flowing from one end to the other with the only case dumped heat from radiative losses. Something that should not be all that different. However, if they use a central fan like in this picture the location pictured is the only location for the VRMS that would allow air to carry the heat out of the case. The other side would push it back in.
That is a weird sample. Why would they locate VRMs on the opposite side of power connectors?![]()