Well I just read this article and they did quite a few different benchmarks to showcase the ability of the 3000+ as the first processor in the Hammer line.
The article can be found here: http://techreport.com/reviews/2004q1/athlon64-3000/index.x?pg=1
Well it compares the performance of the 3000+ to the 3200+ and I was quite surprised as it seems that the additional 512MB on the L2 cache have almost zero effect on performance. Now I am wondering if I should go with the 3200+ or the 3000+ since the 3000+ runs so close to the 3200+ and is $100 CDN less. Input anyone?
The article can be found here: http://techreport.com/reviews/2004q1/athlon64-3000/index.x?pg=1
Well it compares the performance of the 3000+ to the 3200+ and I was quite surprised as it seems that the additional 512MB on the L2 cache have almost zero effect on performance. Now I am wondering if I should go with the 3200+ or the 3000+ since the 3000+ runs so close to the 3200+ and is $100 CDN less. Input anyone?
