• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

AMD 7600 reviews

BFG10K

BFG10K

Lifer
I think the product is below average/subpar but not terrible. The $269 price-point does help a little, even with the 8GB VRAM.


 
Last edited:
jpiniero said:
www.computerbase.de

AMD Radeon RX 7600 im Test: Taktraten, Benchmarks in Full HD mit und ohne RT

AMD Radeon RX 7600 im Test: Taktraten, Benchmarks in Full HD mit und ohne RT / Die Taktraten unter Last
www.computerbase.de www.computerbase.de

7600 loves Callisto and COD MW 2... 20% faster. But most are barely faster than the 6650 XT. F1 22 it was even slower by a tad.
Click to expand...

Yes, it trades blows with the RX 6650. Which really points out the lack of performance improvement from RDNA 3, since these each have 32 CUs.
 
insertcarehere said:
Can we finally stop pretending that RDNA3 architecture is not a dud? What are we seeing here that can't be replicated with an optimized 6650xt on 6nm?
Click to expand...

I can only thing of RT performance, especially in heavy RT workloads like CP77, otherwise this is a meh, simple no perf increse directly from mArchitecture

www-computerbase-de.translate.goog

AMD Radeon RX 7600 im Test: Taktraten, Benchmarks in Full HD mit und ohne RT

AMD Radeon RX 7600 im Test: Taktraten, Benchmarks in Full HD mit und ohne RT / Die Taktraten unter Last
www-computerbase-de.translate.goog www-computerbase-de.translate.goog
Computer-Base-1080p-rt-CP77.jpg
 
AtenRa said:
I can only thing of RT performance, especially in heavy RT workloads like CP77, otherwise this is a meh, simple no perf increse directly from mArchitecture

www-computerbase-de.translate.goog

AMD Radeon RX 7600 im Test: Taktraten, Benchmarks in Full HD mit und ohne RT

AMD Radeon RX 7600 im Test: Taktraten, Benchmarks in Full HD mit und ohne RT / Die Taktraten unter Last
www-computerbase-de.translate.goog www-computerbase-de.translate.goog
Computer-Base-1080p-rt-CP77.jpg
Click to expand...
It is much better than 6650XT that's for sure... But also given how in this benchmark it's still decently slower than the 6700xt in similar proportion to the raster difference I am more inclined to believe something weird happened with the 6650XT there more than that there are dramatic improvements with the 7600.
 
Could have bought a 6600/XT for less and had that level of performance for like a year+.

Not moving the needle any even though it's the least badly priced current gen GPU. Which isn't saying much because they're all badly priced for the current market conditions.

Buy any used 12GB+ card for gaming. If you're paying for 8GB vRAM in 2023 it better be for a deeply discounted used card knowing it's relegated to entry level.
 
insertcarehere said:
Can we finally stop pretending that RDNA3 architecture is not a dud? What are we seeing here that can't be replicated with an optimized 6650xt on 6nm?
Click to expand...
N33 is on 6nm too. Never had high hopes for it. It pretty much is a N23 refresh even in conception. But as you say if RDNA3 wasn't a dud maybe they could have had 10% better performance instead of near equality.
 
insertcarehere said:
Can we finally stop pretending that RDNA3 architecture is not a dud? What are we seeing here that can't be replicated with an optimized 6650xt on 6nm?
Click to expand...
Maybe because aside from the RDNA3 changes, this almost is exactly that: a port of the Navi23 to 6nm. IF - and it is a very big IF - AMD were interested in a high volume part, then this part could be it. Yes, 8GB in 2023 isn't great but if they were to reduce the MSRP closer to $200 it could sell really well.

I still think that the go chiplet crazy strategy was far too risky. A 6nm monolith Navi32 able to perform closer to 6800 with 12GB or better still 16GB at maybe $350 would have sold very well IMO.
 
As Tom's points out, when it comes to new cards, the performance to dollar scaling is nearly the exact same at the 4060 Ti, so they got the same 3.5 star grade.

That's damning with faint praise, and at the end they said they simply don't recommend buying either, and if you want the 7600 at least wait for the 4060 vanilla because that will likely cut its price down.

If this migrates to $199 by the end of summer and they phase out the 6600, then that's "fine". Definitely not exciting, especially given how much more power its using than the 6600 to produce its extra performance. It's nearly 50% more power usage compared to my bench 6600s which according to the AMD overlay top out at 100W out of the box.
 
KompuKare said:
Maybe because aside from the RDNA3 changes, this almost is exactly that: a port of the Navi23 to 6nm. IF - and it is a very big IF - AMD were interested in a high volume part, then this part could be it. Yes, 8GB in 2023 isn't great but if they were to reduce the MSRP closer to $200 it could sell really well.

I still think that the go chiplet crazy strategy was far too risky. A 6nm monolith Navi32 able to perform closer to 6800 with 12GB or better still 16GB at maybe $350 would have sold very well IMO.
Click to expand...

Well, the RDNA3 architectural changes (namely dual FP32 and higher clocks) were supposed to be substantial by themselves.

As it is now dual FP32 doesn't seem to do anything and without a significant process advantage it doesn't even seem to clock much higher on desktop than RDNA2 can.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top