imported_Otter
Member
Valkerie, if you're still reading this thread, I think the signal to noise ratio might improve if you told us exactly what you're going to do with your new computer.
Originally posted by: sandorski
What do you add other than sideswipes of the people posting?
Originally posted by: dmens
Originally posted by: sandorski
What do you add other than sideswipes of the people posting?
LOL, calling "AMD rulez" me-too messages "posts" would be an insult to real posters.
every once in a while when i see something on cpu uarch/circuits or CS worth posting on, i'll add my 2 cents. but since 99% of posts here are fanboi circle-jerkers getting it on, the only thing i can do is troll. HAHAHA.
If laughter is the best medicine, then that was a placebo Rich 😛Originally posted by: RichUK
well if AMD is 64 then it must be better then intel at 32, thats like 2x 32 which = 64 ..WHOOHAA .. i just had a brain wave im gonna get me one of these 64 chips, they sound well good whos with me 😀😀😀
Originally posted by: SententialThere are many benefits to one chip vs the other. The true strenght in Intel lies in their chipset. S939 chipsets as a whole are utter garbage.
What you buy is entirely up to you but I like my pentium 4 much better over my A64. Sure, technically speaking the A64 is faster in games....that of course if it can run them without problems.
While a great number of people have had little issues with A64, I have personally had a great deal. I personally would go with Intel this round until AMD gets their act together.
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
Your decision should have nothing to do with 64-bit vs. 32-bit. It should have to do with Athlon 64 vs. Pentium 4. There IS a difference in those two decisions.
First... the Pentium 4 6x0 chips are 64-bit just like the Athlon 64.
Second... 64-bit vs. 32-bit has nothing to do with speed. The two main things that are related to having 64 bits vs. 32 bits are dynamic range and a larger memory address space. Neither of which you should be concerned about in the least at this point.
Third... The Athlon 64 is not faster than the Pentium 4 because it's 64 bit. It's faster because the external bus (Hyper Transport) is lower latency than Intel's 800 MHz FSB... because it has an on die memory controller which makes memory latency very low compared to Pentium 4's... and because it's shorter, wider pipeline is better suited to the majority of tasks than the Pentium 4's longer, narrower pipeline.
Originally posted by: PetNorth
Originally posted by: SententialThere are many benefits to one chip vs the other. The true strenght in Intel lies in their chipset. S939 chipsets as a whole are utter garbage.
What you buy is entirely up to you but I like my pentium 4 much better over my A64. Sure, technically speaking the A64 is faster in games....that of course if it can run them without problems.
While a great number of people have had little issues with A64, I have personally had a great deal. I personally would go with Intel this round until AMD gets their act together.
Sentential's (and others) troublefree experience with intel chipset boards
Originally posted by: PetNorth
Originally posted by: SententialThere are many benefits to one chip vs the other. The true strenght in Intel lies in their chipset. S939 chipsets as a whole are utter garbage.
What you buy is entirely up to you but I like my pentium 4 much better over my A64. Sure, technically speaking the A64 is faster in games....that of course if it can run them without problems.
While a great number of people have had little issues with A64, I have personally had a great deal. I personally would go with Intel this round until AMD gets their act together.
Sentential's (and others) troublefree experience with intel chipset boards
Originally posted by: Aenslead
Originally posted by: PetNorth
Originally posted by: SententialThere are many benefits to one chip vs the other. The true strenght in Intel lies in their chipset. S939 chipsets as a whole are utter garbage.
What you buy is entirely up to you but I like my pentium 4 much better over my A64. Sure, technically speaking the A64 is faster in games....that of course if it can run them without problems.
While a great number of people have had little issues with A64, I have personally had a great deal. I personally would go with Intel this round until AMD gets their act together.
Sentential's (and others) troublefree experience with intel chipset boards
LMAO!!!
Great reply. Intel chipsets aren't that fancy anymore. nForce 4 for AMD more than makes up for any missing chipset support from AMD.
I myself have had trouble with Intel mobo/chipsets... they are everything but flawless.
Originally posted by: Lithan
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
Your decision should have nothing to do with 64-bit vs. 32-bit. It should have to do with Athlon 64 vs. Pentium 4. There IS a difference in those two decisions.
First... the Pentium 4 6x0 chips are 64-bit just like the Athlon 64.
Second... 64-bit vs. 32-bit has nothing to do with speed. The two main things that are related to having 64 bits vs. 32 bits are dynamic range and a larger memory address space. Neither of which you should be concerned about in the least at this point.
Third... The Athlon 64 is not faster than the Pentium 4 because it's 64 bit. It's faster because the external bus (Hyper Transport) is lower latency than Intel's 800 MHz FSB... because it has an on die memory controller which makes memory latency very low compared to Pentium 4's... and because it's shorter, wider pipeline is better suited to the majority of tasks than the Pentium 4's longer, narrower pipeline.
*Starts making hand gestures to demonstrate what Jeff is saying.*
Originally posted by: carlosd
Originally posted by: Aenslead
Originally posted by: PetNorth
Originally posted by: SententialThere are many benefits to one chip vs the other. The true strenght in Intel lies in their chipset. S939 chipsets as a whole are utter garbage.
What you buy is entirely up to you but I like my pentium 4 much better over my A64. Sure, technically speaking the A64 is faster in games....that of course if it can run them without problems.
While a great number of people have had little issues with A64, I have personally had a great deal. I personally would go with Intel this round until AMD gets their act together.
Sentential's (and others) troublefree experience with intel chipset boards
LMAO!!!
Great reply. Intel chipsets aren't that fancy anymore. nForce 4 for AMD more than makes up for any missing chipset support from AMD.
I myself have had trouble with Intel mobo/chipsets... they are everything but flawless.
I also have had lots of problems with intel system, oh god I really hate them, but those are more CPU HEAT problems with the crappy pressHOT. In the other hand the A64 system I have built have been perfectly stable almost all the time, and worked with no problems with the components out of the box.
S939 chipsets as a whole are utter garbage.
In addition with Intel you get reasonably priced dual-cores, plus the future proof DDR2 and PCI-E.
Originally posted by: Sentential
Originally posted by: dmens
LOL seriously... all the kidz on this forum just regurgitate self-evident statements and pretend they are good with the tech and stuff, and act all stuck up on people who know slightly less than they do.
what a riot.
^^ Agreed.
There are many benefits to one chip vs the other. The true strenght in Intel lies in their chipset. S939 chipsets as a whole are utter garbage.
In addition with Intel you get reasonably priced dual-cores, plus the future proof DDR2 and PCI-E. Granted Intel is slower in raw games, it has other features including HT that make up for it in general every-day use.