• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

AMD 5000+, HD3850 build complete

Parts used:
Tt Soprano Black case (kept from previous)
GECUBE Radeon HD3850 512MB GDDR3 video card
Silverstone ST75F 750 modular PSU
AMD Athlon X2 5000+ Black Edition
WD 250GB HDD
Zalman CNPS 9500 AM2 CPU Cooler
2GB OCZ Vista Upgrade DDR2 RAM
MSI K9A2 Platinum motherboard
Windows Vista Home Premium 64 bit
ASUS DVD/CD-RW Combo drive (kept from previous)

Total Cost: $903, including shipping and not including the two parts retained from previous machine.

Build notes:
The video card is quite long and fit in my case okay, even with a HDD mounted at the same level, but that could be a problem with a smaller case. It's very quiet.

The MSI motherboard comes with little adapters for the mini plugs that are used to attach power switch, reset switch, USB connections, etc. from the case to the MB which make it much easier to do. You plug the little plugs into the well labeled adapters and then just plug the whole adapter onto the motherboard pins. A simple thing but nice.

The CPU cooler is sexy and you can point the airflow however you want to based on your case configuration. It uses a seperate controller for fan speed rather than allowing the m/b to control the speed, which I thought was strange. However, even at max, it is not terribly loud and my temps are fairly low. I haven't spent a lot of time trying to see how much they change under load or anything. I'll do some more testing at a later date.

Vista is definitely maturing quickly. The 64 bit edition that I got had no trouble recognizing anything and I was up and running in about 45 minutes once I got all the parts installed. Took another hour or so to download and install updates, but I was able to surf and explore the new desktop while all that was happening so it wasn't a big deal. Generally, I think I like Vista. I don't think anyone running an older machine should consider upgrading to it however. It really is a resource hog. When I booted up the first time, I went with 1 stick of RAM just to ensure there were no weird issues with the two sticks (I had read that some people ran into that in various places with Vista) and it was consistently using 50% of my RAM just to sit and look at the desktop. It's doing a lot more stuff in the background than XP did. And FYI, if you've been watching those Apple commercials ('cancel or allow'), that actually DOES happen while you're doing a lot of installing at the beginning but 98% of the time everything is normal after that. It hasn't seemed particularly intrusive to me. I wouldn't be afraid of upgrading to Vista with a new machine anymore. The water is fine, come on in.

Peformance Notes:
Some people suggested that I'd be better off with an Intel CPU instead of the AMD for the price. I'm sure they were right, but I don't feel cheated. I ran 3DMark06 awhile ago and my score was 8712. I compared on Futuremark's site with other computers running the same video card, but with Intel processors and the Intel processors that were comparable in performance to mine were the ones that were about $130 (E4500's, mostly). The ones that smoked my scores were all the higher end, more expensive ones. This seems to me to be as I would expect. Price to performance is about the same for them at stock speeds. Intel is more overclockable, so if that's of value to you, definitely consider Intel. But don't be skeered of the AMD. Too many people are stat jockeys and will tell you that one or the other is hands down the best there is, but in reality both are quite good.

I've played some games on it and it is way beyond acceptable. I am able to crank the settings all the way up on all games that I currently have. I don't have Crysis which seems to be the gold standard for whooping up on your video card. Going to be loading up Bioshock soon to see how that looks. FEAR, WOW, and CS:S and all the HL2 games are fantastic. And my g/f says Toontown works just great, too. *rolls eyes* Again, a little comparing on the futuremark site revealed that the 3850 performs extremely competitively with the 3870, though the 3870X2 is another story entirely. THAT is a much faster card if you want to spend the money.

Soooo... again, thank you to all of you who offered your advice while I was mulling this over and I'll post more results on this thread later once I get it all humming along nicely.
 
Excellent. I sorta took the divergent path as you recently and went for an Intel build but I went on the super cheap and got myself an E2180 because I knew I'd overclock it. I'm eying the 3870 and 3850s right now so I can ditch the 6800GS in my opty, put the x1950 pro into the opty.. all in all I spent about $700 for PC #1 in my sig, along with those parts I got a Lian-Li case, Raptor, PSU and OEM Vista license. Not bad, but, like you said, this would have easily cost me much more had I required a video card (carried the x1950 pro over) and wasn't inclined to overclock. If it weren't the E2180, I was looking at $200+ for 2.6 to 3.2ghz dual or quad intel.

In reality, I didn't even need to upgrade. The opty 180 is still a formidable chip and I haven't seen any real performance hits in any games, so my spending was really frivolous, deep down.

But I do a lot of XviD encoding and I'm excited about the increased mpg4 encoding performance that Intel will give me. I also got an easy overclock that seems illegal based on the jump (2ghz to 3.2! with just a NUDGE of vcore) and it really does put me in a different league than the Opteron in some respects at this speed.

My Opteron is a great machine and will be used and abused for a few more years, I'm sure. I really does still rock the latest games with ease and if I threw a better card in there I'm sure I'd have been able to keep going for some time. I waxed poetic about the 939 socket in a recent thread and I'll keep her going as long as I can. It will make a stellar MCE box. My girlfriend would love to inherit it as her XP3000+ is getting long in the tooth.

*sigh*. I'm glad you're happy with your build. I would have gone with AMD but I couldn't resist an Intel chip because of so many amazing overclocks I was seeing people post here. I had to follow along, since, as you can see, I've been giving my AMD boxes the similar treatment. I truly believe that the 939s and Opteron OC wave that hit a few years back was one of the golden times for overclocking. It was a great chipset with great processors and it really maximized DDR1's potential in a way no previous chipset had. When I started building my first 939 Opteron rig, all Intel had to offer was hot metal and seek times. . 🙂

But, like you, I've moved on to a DDR2 board -- finally -- and have some flexibility in the future in terms of quad, .45nm, etc. So I'm happy. This core rig will probably last me quite some time. And, we must not forget -- the girlfriend is going to need a new machine soon. What better time to maybe ... say, try a tri-core? b3 Phenom? It wouldn't upset me to have a current AMD box in the house on my network. 😀

Cheers.

My intel build thread is here, btw: http://forums.anandtech.com/me...=2157726&enterthread=y

 
Peformance Notes:
Some people suggested that I'd be better off with an Intel CPU instead of the AMD for the price. I'm sure they were right, but I don't feel cheated. I ran 3DMark06 awhile ago and my score was 8712. I compared on Futuremark's site with other computers running the same video card, but with Intel processors and the Intel processors that were comparable in performance to mine were the ones that were about $130 (E4500's, mostly). The ones that smoked my scores were all the higher end, more expensive ones. This seems to me to be as I would expect. Price to performance is about the same for them at stock speeds. Intel is more overclockable, so if that's of value to you, definitely consider Intel. But don't be skeered of the AMD. Too many people are stat jockeys and will tell you that one or the other is hands down the best there is, but in reality both are quite good.


----

First, congrats on your build, I hope you enjoy it....

However, I disagree with the performance disparity....I built an entire system (not including keyboard, mouse, monitor) from scratch like this

abit ip35-e $60 (AR)
coolermaster ammo case - $0 (AR)
coolermaster extreme power 550w - $10 (AR)
2gb mushkin pc800 4-5-5-11 (which im running at same speeds at 868 rightnow) $35 (AR)
windows vista ultimate retail $210 (running 64bit)
zerotherm btf92 OC $32 (AR)
MSI 8800GT $215 (could get a much nicer OC one for $195 now)
e8400 retail $190
seagate 7200.11 500gb $118
samsung dvd cd-rw h203 $25
extras (2 high cfm fans, IC diamond 7, etc) - $25

total $920 (but thats more stuff than you are bought)...

most of this stuff was bought late december/january where I cherry picked things off of newegg, clubit, zipzoomfly, ebay (for the vista, got a nice deal)..etc...

i think my 3dmark06 at stock was about 11k, more like 10.5k...

at 3.9 my e8400 runs 2 hours prime 95 and doesnt break 60

i think for the same money, you can do much better with intel....


 
Originally posted by: richwenzel
MSI 8800GT $215 (could get a much nicer OC one for $195 now)
e8400 retail $190
...
total $920 (but thats more stuff than you are bought)...

most of this stuff was bought late december/january where I cherry picked things off of newegg, clubit, zipzoomfly, ebay (for the vista, got a nice deal)..etc...

i think my 3dmark06 at stock was about 11k, more like 10.5k...
...
i think for the same money, you can do much better with intel....

#1 Most of your 3DMark06 gain was from the more expensive video card.

#2 The 5000+ Black Edition has been available for $90 shipping included, less than half the cost of your E8400. An equivalent CPU would be an E2180/E2200. For $190, can get lowest end Phenom.

#3 I see no indication that TheWrongTree is overclocking. That takes away Intel's biggest advantage when dealing with budget CPUs. When you're looking at under $200 CPUs, and especially under $100 CPUs, AMD's offerings are not that bad when not overclocking.

#4 By your own admission you "cherry picked" deals for your purchase. TheWrongTree bought a really nice power supply (JonnyGURU rated tier 1) that cost $150 more than the one you got (after rebate). That accounts for a huge chunk of change. Also, the Silverstone PSU is modular, and despite being "rated" only 200W more than your Cooler Master, if both were load tested the Silverstone would likely be able to output a full two times the real output of the Cooler Master.


So, you are right in that for the same money you can do better with an Intel processor setup. However, you are skewing the numbers your way. If someone wanted to duplicate your feat right now without waiting for deals, they'd have a difficult time getting anywhere close to $920.

abit ip35-e $70 (AR) or $100 no rebate
coolermaster ammo case - $60
coolermaster extreme power 550w - $60
e8400 retail $240

So, without those deals you're looking at $170 more, and if you swap the PSU for the Silverstone you're looking at $270 more.

Anyways, glad you (richwenzel) like your E8400 setup. It seems really nice (except for the mediocre PSU, LOL). And also glad that TheWrongTree likes his Black Edition setup. When all is said and done, both systems seem to be able to do what their owners ask of them.
 
Originally posted by: richwenzel


i think my 3dmark06 at stock was about 11k, more like 10.5k...

at 3.9 my e8400 runs 2 hours prime 95 and doesnt break 60

i think for the same money, you can do much better with intel....

Hey, Rich! Excellent build. I think your higher 3DMark score is more a result of the video card than the processor. If I look at AMD's (slower than mine, even) running that same video card, they are in the 10,000+ range also. I think that I might have made a poor selection there, but I had heard good things about the card I got (and read some good things also) and so thought I might give ATi a chance. So far, it hasn't balked at anything that I've used it for.... we'll see when we try some newer games if I feel like I got robbed 🙂



 
Yah done great, WrongTree 🙂

I've got an MSI 790fx with a pair of OC'ed 2900pros ($145/each). Combined with an X2 5400+ @ 3.2GHz (stock volts and a really 'cool' Opty copper heat pipe cooler) that cost me $95.


Edit: I didn't want to 'smack' you but I got a 9152 on a single 2900pro 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Zap


Anyways, glad you (richwenzel) like your E8400 setup. It seems really nice (except for the mediocre PSU, LOL). And also glad that TheWrongTree likes his Black Edition setup. When all is said and done, both systems seem to be able to do what their owners ask of them.

Yeah, what he said lol








 
to ZAP

I got an cooler master 850w emba for $60 too, so if you want to make it 980....

i didn't carry over any new items...

my score i posted was everything at stock...

i agree that it was more to do with the graphics card, but i was responding to what he posted...for basically the same price, and at stock, i got about 2k more pcmark, and if i were to buy the same graphics card at todays prices, it would be $30ish cheaper...

maybe my post sounded like an "i am better than you" type of post, and if it did, i sincerely am sorry. i am considering a phenom non-oc system for my mother (she likes to have 40 things running at the same time, may be forgetfulness), but my point was for around the same $ spent, you can do much better than going amd route...if we were to go by stock on benchmark for benchmark in a dual core system....

btw, if you are diligent and go to froogle, you can get the 38400 sub 200....as for the mediocre PSU, you are right, but the value/price ratio was quite high...as for the case part (which shouldnt be factored cause he didn't buy a case at all, i would get a cheaper case than the $60 ammo)..also if you really want to do adjustments, please adjust his cost up more for not getting vista ultimate, or adjust my down (not sure if his was OEM or retail, mine was retail)...your extra cost kinda diminishes then...as you lose the $60 for the case, you have to subtract $25 dvd (he didnt buy one), and what about $100 for the vista differences...so that $170-60-25-100 is down to negative $15....if you want a good psu, zzf has the cooler master real power 750w for $80, change out the $10 i paid for the mediocre one and im $55 more...if you use the real power pro 850w i got for %60, im only up $35 for the build...

 
Originally posted by: richwenzel
to ZAP

I got an cooler master 850w emba for $60 too, so if you want to make it 980....

i didn't carry over any new items...

my score i posted was everything at stock...

i agree that it was more to do with the graphics card, but i was responding to what he posted...for basically the same price, and at stock, i got about 2k more pcmark, and if i were to buy the same graphics card at todays prices, it would be $30ish cheaper...

maybe my post sounded like an "i am better than you" type of post, and if it did, i sincerely am sorry. i am considering a phenom non-oc system for my mother (she likes to have 40 things running at the same time, may be forgetfulness), but my point was for around the same $ spent, you can do much better than going amd route...if we were to go by stock on benchmark for benchmark in a dual core system....

No offense taken on my part 🙂 I still think it's mostly the video card though, as opposed to it being an AMD vs. Intel difference. Had I dropped an 8800GT in instead, I think it would have done better at that particular benchmark. They were actually about the same price... I just chose to try something different this time. There are a number of AMD 4800+ machines running those video cards that posted identical numbers to yours.

Truly, I think Intel's perceived 'lead' is based on two factors... first, on the bleeding edge... highest end processors, they are just faster than the current high end AMD's. The highest end Phenoms are just not as good as the highest end Intel's. AMD still has some tweaking to do on their 65nm process. Second, the current crop of Intels overclock much better.

In the middle of the spectrum, for someone who is not going to overclock... I don't think there's a difference. Price for performance they are nearly identical and both are quite good.


 
when amd's triple cores come out at 190 (as the quads are $220ish)...this is my guess at the price, no inside info...it will be very hard to choose an e8400 as a non-oc and might be tight as an oc...thats my opinion....

 
Originally posted by: richwenzel
when amd's triple cores come out at 190 (as the quads are $220ish)...this is my guess at the price, no inside info...it will be very hard to choose an e8400 as a non-oc and might be tight as an oc...thats my opinion....

Tricores, if priced cheaply, will present a very interesting option indeed.
 
Real nice build Wrongtree,, i don't think i'd change much [maybe 2x2gig ddr2 8000 & vista64] if it were mine !! & I really thought long & hard about the 5000x2 black, before i gave in & went the way of rich [who's been trying to justify his E8400] mostly because of the easy 3.6ghz overclock this setup provides..

You should get alot of fun & usage out of that black 5000, how did you like that motherboard you used ??? That was the only thing in the AMD setup that i couldn't sttle on , not even North Bridge !!

Enjoy your new puter !! Ol'Pal 😀
 
I went the intel route:

E2180, $71
Gigabyte DS3L, $90
4 gig of HP (micron D9 chip) ram, $12 AR
Antec EA500 ($35 AR, possible ~$7 RMA)
ECS 8800GT (OC, with accelero S1) $206 AR
Recycled Antec BQE case
Ubuntu 7.10
---
$430ish AR/stamps/RMA

This thing runs everything, and I do mean EVERYTHING. It's so *easy* to OC a 2 series CPU that it's almost a crime not to. Literaly hit escape, go to 'intelligent tweaker', type '266' into the FSB field and you're *DONE*. Yes, a 3ghz or higher OC and/or running RAM at optimum requires a bit of knowlege and a few more keystrokes, but that's just a bonus.

And if not overclocking, there are plenty of sub-$60 boards which make the $120 E4500 very price competitive with a 5000/6000/6400 build.

I'll run the 3dmark06 later, but judging from the Lost Coast numbers I've been getting it should be more than competitive with your AMD build for est. 2/3 the price.
 
Originally posted by: OLpal
Real nice build Wrongtree,, i don't think i'd change much [maybe 2x2gig ddr2 8000 & vista64] if it were mine !! & I really thought long & hard about the 5000x2 black, before i gave in & went the way of rich [who's been trying to justify his E8400] mostly because of the easy 3.6ghz overclock this setup provides..

You should get alot of fun & usage out of that black 5000, how did you like that motherboard you used ??? That was the only thing in the AMD setup that i couldn't sttle on , not even North Bridge !!

Enjoy your new puter !! Ol'Pal 😀


This was the first MSI m/b that I've used. Always used ASUS before and liked them well enough. But this one seemed to be the most flexible m/b out (and it's quite attractive as well with its black pcb and shiny copper heat pipes. From a practicality standpoint, the heat pipes are kind of in the way. I had a little difficulty getting the video card into the top slot because it very nearly touches the heat pipe at the far end. It also made it a little difficult to attach the large CPU cooler. However, not impossible and not really all that crazy.. it just made it a tiny little bit more of a headache than it could have been.

On the other hand, I did like the little connectors that MSI included for plugging all those little pins into for the front panel switches, USB connectors and such. Instead of having to decipher those little pin maps, they gave you a nicely labeled socket thing to plug them all into which you could do in your hand and then just put the whole socket thing onto the pins all nice and friendly like. Much simpler. I don't know if that's becoming standard practice with other manufacturers, but I like it.

On the functionality side, the onboard sound is REALLY nice. Much better sounding than anything I ever had from ASUS. And having four PCI-e slots is a bonus. I don't know that I'll ever use them... but then again, maybe I will in a year or so. I could also do two cards in Crossfire and add a physics card as well (if those suddenly start being supported soon).

THe only thing I would have liked it to have in addition is... maybe a microwave so I could make Hot Pockets in it. That would kick butt.

Overall, it is a much better system than I had and runs everything that I want it to at the moment.
 
Originally posted by: v8envy
I went the intel route:

E2180, $71
Gigabyte DS3L, $90
4 gig of HP (micron D9 chip) ram, $12 AR
Antec EA500 ($35 AR, possible ~$7 RMA)
ECS 8800GT (OC, with accelero S1) $206 AR
Recycled Antec BQE case
Ubuntu 7.10
---
$430ish AR/stamps/RMA

This thing runs everything, and I do mean EVERYTHING. It's so *easy* to OC a 2 series CPU that it's almost a crime not to. Literaly hit escape, go to 'intelligent tweaker', type '266' into the FSB field and you're *DONE*. Yes, a 3ghz or higher OC and/or running RAM at optimum requires a bit of knowlege and a few more keystrokes, but that's just a bonus.

And if not overclocking, there are plenty of sub-$60 boards which make the $120 E4500 very price competitive with a 5000/6000/6400 build.

I'll run the 3dmark06 later, but judging from the Lost Coast numbers I've been getting it should be more than competitive with your AMD build for est. 2/3 the price.


Rock on, man! I think you've done a great bang for the buck build. I'd be curious to see your 3DMark scores to compare. Post the link to them when you get it run? I think I probably shoulda went with an 8800GT, but I'm not really having any issues with the ATi card either, so I'm not too dejected about it 😀 Besides, there's always next paycheck. lol
 
Originally posted by: TheWrongTree
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo

Edit: I didn't want to 'smack' you but I got a 9152 on a single 2900pro 🙂


Haha! Sweet!


Without going into an exhaustive explanation, your memory is running at 743MHz with the X2 5000+ BE.

If you hit the 'Delete' button at boot and enter the BIOS you will see the ""Cell Menu"". Click on the Cell Menu and you will see a setting for the ""CPU Ratio"".

Click on the 'CPU ratio' and change the setting from 'Auto" to x14. Hit 'F10' to save and exit.

Your ram will now run at spec 800MHz.

And as an added benefit your cpu will now run at 2.8GHz without overclocking.
 
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Originally posted by: TheWrongTree
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo

Edit: I didn't want to 'smack' you but I got a 9152 on a single 2900pro 🙂


Haha! Sweet!


Without going into an exhaustive explanation, your memory is running at 743MHz with the X2 5000+ BE.

If you hit the 'Delete' button at boot and enter the BIOS you will see the ""Cell Menu"". Click on the Cell Menu and you will see a setting for the ""CPU Ratio"".

Click on the 'CPU ratio' and change the setting from 'Auto" to x14. Hit 'F10' to save and exit.

Your ram will now run at spec 800MHz.

And as an added benefit your cpu will now run at 2.8GHz without overclocking.


THanks for the tip! I had read something about that, but didn't want to mess with anything until I let it all get settled in the way it was born. I'll give it a try!
 
It's great that you are satisfied with your system and didn't feel cheated. Honestly, that's what matters most.

Overall, there are places where you went overkill (IMO) which made you sacrifice in other areas.
- The 3850 definitely doesn't seem worth it anymore after seeing the benchmarks of the 9600GT. The price difference between the two is only $10, and Tech Report, Tom's Hardware, and AnandTech have all put the 9600GT ahead of the 3850. However, if you had bought the system in January (and needed it), then it would've been hard to pick between buying now and buying later.
- Motherboard is quite expensive at $180 if it's not on sale. If you need the extras on it, then its a different story. If not, then the extra $80ish could've gone somewhere else, such as more memory, a better video card, or a bigger hard drive.
- Power supply. While it's the most core component of the PC, buying something as high end as that PSU without being so high end, seems like such a waste to me. There are other PSUs that still very good quality, modular, and would have been sufficient for the system you built, and probably for the next one or two after. You don't have anything that warrants the need for 750w unless you have 5 more hard drives + another 3850 in hiding that you're not telling us about 😉. Another particular component you could've cut back on, still gotten a quality component, and spend the extra cash else where.
 
Originally posted by: chinaman1472
It's great that you are satisfied with your system and didn't feel cheated. Honestly, that's what matters most.

Overall, there are places where you went overkill (IMO) which made you sacrifice in other areas.


Yes, I could have cheaped out a little bit on the mobo and PSU and gotten better other stuff, but then I would have blown my entire original purpose, which was to build a system that was as flexible and upgradeable as possible. I enjoy switching parts in and out and seeing what works. Not so much starting over from scratch all the time.

As an example, you have a socket 939 board on the rig in your signature. I also had a socket 939 board which I bought right when the AM2's were JUST coming out. I should have got the AM2 board, but I cheaped out and went with 939 instead. Regretted it very quickly. That's why I got the board with the most options I could find this time.

As you say though, I am happy and that is what matters. Only time will tell if I remain happy or not. lol

I'm curious, chinaman... have you run 3DMark06 on your rig? I've been wondering how big a difference the CPU and DDR2 makes on that test. There was another guy further down that said he had about 10,500 with an 8800GT with a newer Intel CPU. If your score is in the same neighborhood, that would be telling, indeed.
 
one thing about hte psu...

in your next build, it should still be good....

thats one of the benefits of spending money on some pieces...that $400 graphics card today will be $100 in 2 years....i bet that psu holds value and usefulness much better.
 
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Yah done great, WrongTree 🙂

I've got an MSI 790fx with a pair of OC'ed 2900pros ($145/each). Combined with an X2 5400+ @ 3.2GHz (stock volts and a really 'cool' Opty copper heat pipe cooler) that cost me $95.


Edit: I didn't want to 'smack' you but I got a 9152 on a single 2900pro 🙂

I found something else interesting when I went to go make that change, heyey...

PCIe 2.0 is not activated by default. I turned that on (and increased the multiplier on my CPU so that it is at 2800 (not much of an OC, I know 🙂 ) The memory seemed to already be running at 800. It didn't have an option to go to an x14 multiplier. Maybe because of the black edition CPU, which unlocks the CPU multiplier from the RAM? Never been an overclocking sort of person, so I don't know anything other than the snippets of what I've read here and there about it. Anyway, I got a 9116 now. Thanks again for the tip.

 
Back
Top