AMD 45nm desktop processor naming update

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,110
64
91
Originally posted by: aigomorla
Originally posted by: ajaidevsingh

EDIT:- ALso from what i can gather can ANYONE TELL ME THE RELEASES DATE FOR "Gillette deneb" ???

ive been trying to find that info out b4 the thread started becoming back to the future 2 on us.

lol.

I thought it was Jan 9th, NDA lifting Jan 8th.

Those are the dates that have been broadcasted across the internet. How did you not hear by now? Or are those dates not to be believed and you are talking about finding out some legitimate dates?

TheINQ'ing minds want to know :D
 

taltamir

Lifer
Mar 21, 2004
13,576
6
76
Originally posted by: ajaidevsingh
I think AMD 20550 should be faster than Intel 80562 but not Intel 80569???

EDIT:- ALso from what i can gather can ANYONE TELL ME THE RELEASES DATE FOR "Gillette deneb" ???

like... a deneb with 5 blades and a vibration function?
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,067
3,574
126
Originally posted by: Idontcare
Originally posted by: aigomorla
Originally posted by: ajaidevsingh

EDIT:- ALso from what i can gather can ANYONE TELL ME THE RELEASES DATE FOR "Gillette deneb" ???

ive been trying to find that info out b4 the thread started becoming back to the future 2 on us.

lol.

I thought it was Jan 9th, NDA lifting Jan 8th.

Those are the dates that have been broadcasted across the internet. How did you not hear by now? Or are those dates not to be believed and you are talking about finding out some legitimate dates?

TheINQ'ing minds want to know :D

Well, i was trying to keep up with this thread, but it became pointless :

http://www.xtremesystems.org/f...howthread.php?t=202407

 

daveybrat

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jan 31, 2000
5,817
1,029
126
Originally posted by: taltamir
Originally posted by: ajaidevsingh
I think AMD 20550 should be faster than Intel 80562 but not Intel 80569???

EDIT:- ALso from what i can gather can ANYONE TELL ME THE RELEASES DATE FOR "Gillette deneb" ???

like... a deneb with 5 blades and a vibration function?

......and it squirts arctic silver on your face for that closer than a blade shave! :p


 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,067
3,574
126
Originally posted by: taltamir
sweet! does it cost 10 times more as well?

only if you want the OEM fan. LOL....

okey lets get back on track, i think we had a nice enough detour. :p
 

SolMiester

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2004
5,330
17
76
Originally posted by: Idontcare
Originally posted by: taltamir
As for the Q6600 being old... so is sex as a means of reproduction. If something works, and works better then other options, why replace it? New =! better.

But old is not sexy, unless you are Ashton Kutcher.

I love my Q6600's, but they are no longer sexy. That's why I moved them from my office to the basement. Bitches be working just as hard as ever, but I don't have to look them in the eye anymore. Just as it should be. ;) Time for the new sexy bitches, Deneb and Nehalem, come!

LMAO - best post i have read all week thank you 'i dont care'
 

Dadofamunky

Platinum Member
Jan 4, 2005
2,184
0
0
Originally posted by: batmang
^^^^ I just learned a shitload about shaving. DENEB FTW!

We're always here to help. :D :beer:

Originally posted by: Glob
Cheap electric razors are probably the best way to go. The heads dull within a few years and the batteries normally become less efficient within about a year, but if you leave it tethered to a power outlet all the time, it'll be ready to go when you need it to be. Plus, it's easier to shave one-handed while you fly a jet pack into work.

Now THERE is an image I will take with me to my grave!

I do have to admit, I hope Deneb is successful. I could see building an SFF to run Blu-Ray movies upstairs with a cheap 26" LCD... Then again, I doubt I need four cores for that... Good times.
 

Foxery

Golden Member
Jan 24, 2008
1,709
0
0
Originally posted by: Martimus
Traffic is a problem mostly because we are bottlenecked by the roads. If we got rid of roads (flying cars) we would only be bottlenecked by the destination.

You could view transportation as a computer science problem. (Hey, we have to keep this on topic somehow, right? ;) )
People -> Data
Buildings -> Storage devices
Roads -> System Bandwidth

The root of the problem is a glut of data (overpopulation,) and the "system" can only be expanded so much to accommodate it, before hitting technical limitations - in large cities, this means physically running out of free space to pave. There's no more room to add pathways, (roads,) and increasing the frequency (speed limit) causes crashes. (Literally :p )

If you have ever flown an airplane, you would understand this. Flying is much easier than driving, mostly because you don't have to worry about actually running into anything (obstructions are so far apart, and there are rules as to what altitude to fly depending on direction and other things).

Well, that's simply untrue. Every airplane's entire route is pre-planned and monitored constantly by the pilots and each airport's Air Traffic Control tower the entire time to avoid collisions. Passenger planes also aren't flying into suburban neighborhoods, or parking downtown.

Here's a neat composite of 24 hours of air traffic over North America: Image (Brighter colors = higher traffic. High res and more data available here.)

Originally posted by: taltamir
martimus... and then each driver needs the level of instrumentation, coordination (with air traffic control), and training as a commercial PILOT! Not everyone is cut out to be a pilot. It will ONLY work if the cars fly themselves.

Automated is the only way. As you add more vehicles, the complexity of organizing their routes increases geometrically. (Exponentially?) Tracking a city full of flying people couldn't be managed by the traditional human air-traffic controllers, never mind individual drivers.
 

Martimus

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2007
4,490
157
106
Originally posted by: Foxery
[
If you have ever flown an airplane, you would understand this. Flying is much easier than driving, mostly because you don't have to worry about actually running into anything (obstructions are so far apart, and there are rules as to what altitude to fly depending on direction and other things).

Well, that's simply untrue. Every airplane's entire route is pre-planned and monitored constantly by the pilots and each airport's Air Traffic Control tower the entire time to avoid collisions. Passenger planes also aren't flying into suburban neighborhoods, or parking downtown.

Here's a neat composite of 24 hours of air traffic over North America: Image (Brighter colors = higher traffic. High res and more data available here.)

I should never have responded in the first place, but since I did, I will continue. (I'm a gluton for punishment.) At least half of the airports I have flown to have not had air-traffic controllers. Our flight plans are pre-planned, but that again has nothing to do with running into objects in space, because they simply don't exist (or at least they are far enough apart that they are less of a worry than when driving). When I got into flying, I was simply amazed at how easy it was. I thought it was much easier than driving, since I went through groundschool at the same time I did Drivers Training, so I didn't have a more experience one way or the other at the time. While in transit, there is little to worry about in comparison to driving a car. Of course at the departure and arrival points there is much more to worry about than driving a car, so it is more of a change of where you have the traffic and congestion. You aren't allowed to have a momentary loss of concentration when driving, but it is far less important to keep a constant concetration level when flying. Of course the consequences of crashing are far more severe, but it is also much more difficult to do on a standard airplane.

Edit: I love how this conversation quickly departed from the actual subject of the 45nm AMD processors, since there is so little information available on them. I am actually glad that I read through all of this though, since Taltamir gave me an idea for shaving, that I have tried out and I haven't had razor burn since. (I just shave with the grain of my hair, instead of against it, and now the areas that always had ingrown hairs have been pretty smooth.) So thanks, Taltamir :)
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,067
3,574
126
Originally posted by: Idontcare
Originally posted by: taltamir
As for the Q6600 being old... so is sex as a means of reproduction. If something works, and works better then other options, why replace it? New =! better.

But old is not sexy, unless you are Ashton Kutcher.

I love my Q6600's, but they are no longer sexy. That's why I moved them from my office to the basement. Bitches be working just as hard as ever, but I don't have to look them in the eye anymore. Just as it should be. ;) Time for the new sexy bitches, Deneb and Nehalem, come!

oh you trying to get my EVA chan to cheat on me?

http://i125.photobucket.com/al...aigomorla/nehaneha.jpg