AMD 390x Improvement over 290X is because of driver

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
6,754
12,500
136
I saw this test where they clocked the 290X and 390X the same and if u look from the benchmark it's the same card.

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2015/06/18/msi_r9_390x_gaming_8g_video_card_review/9

Their clock for clock comparison is very flawed. You can see this by simply looking at the 2 games they didn't test clock for clock but were in the review.

1434612549l1GBQzJE5q_3_4.gif
1434612549l1GBQzJE5q_4_3.gif


That's an increase of 40.6% and 27.5% from a 5% clock bump and higher memory bandwidth? Doubtful. Perhaps something to do with the drivers but pcper doesn't show that much improvement though they didn't test Witcher 3 or Project Cars which hardware.info showed a 30+% improvement as well. There's some good evidence that there's some tweaks there that show up big in some games and small or none at all in others. Hopefully it gets some more testing but from what HardOCP and Ryan were told, they're not just rebrands.
 

Innokentij

Senior member
Jan 14, 2014
237
7
81
The Witcher 3 was in the clock for clock from what i can see? The clock for clock was done using high not ultra and no hairworks, maybe 390X better at hairworks? duno hard opc will have to englighten me on that.

Edit: Or maybe tesstaletion since 290X is sub par on that part.
 

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
6,754
12,500
136

gamervivek

Senior member
Jan 17, 2011
490
53
91
I didn't realize that GTA V also showed such a bump, then it's strange that they don't see such big improvement in Far Cry 4 with godrays turned to maximum.