Originally posted by: anandtechrocks
I would recommend the 3800+, it is cheaper, and has so far turned out to be a very good overclocker. I have read many post of people getting 2.8 ghz on air relatively easy.
Originally posted by: jimgeagea
which one to get guys? is the 100$ worth?
i am talking here about the new 90nm core
Originally posted by: Zebo
4000!
Real deal full 1MB lvl 2 cache, not some stripped down chip like 3800.
Edit: no one spending $150 on a 3000 and overclcoking it can be a 4000😉 Anyone can become the 3800.🙂
Originally posted by: jimgeagea
hmmm, are u satisfied with your 3700??
there is only 5% difference bettween the 3800 and 4000
but a 200MHZ difference betwen 3700 and 3800, i cant get how the 3700 will be faster?
Originally posted by: thanasi
first off someone stole my link i was up late hours looking for the new amd benches tweaking on coffie coughing cause i smoke a pack of cigs in 2 hours anyways get the amd 4000 we all sit there and say 3700 no 4000 no 3700 no 4000 chew our nails till they hurt,plus you amd 4000 sounds cooler and will hit 3 ghz on watercooling.wait an extra week you bascilly got fx 55 for almost half the cost 3700 is a little worry on hitting 3 but 4000 will.plus look at thsi if a hot chick comes to your crib tell you got amd 4000 shell wanna fcuk you on that alone if you say I got 3700 shell be like my mom wants me home soon you see how it works out
Originally posted by: thanasi
what moron sorry I made a joke you lame herb.you can post it anywhere Siht give it to donald trump no president bush.I still love adolf hitler regaurdless.