But Desktop chisp are running at higher clocks, with more cores, and a lower TDP than Thuban. How does that work?
Your either a AMD guy or a Intel guy
Yes, but if the desktop chips can run at higher clocks with less power, why are the server chips stuck on the same clockspeed at the same TDP?
Of, course, maybe they aren't![]()
but still, the 6180 is only 2.5ghz. Are we to expect that BD is clocked equal to or slower than that?
33% more cores, at equal or greater clockspeeds, is up to 38% faster in highly multithreaded apps?
that still does not sound too good even if it is in line with JF's original claims. I would vote for just taking the llano design, axing the GPU, and adding more cores. I mean you could fit what... 10 of those in 300mm^2 or less? double the die and 20 cores. For reference, CPU-world lists llano as 228mm^2
>Your either a AMD guy or a Intel guy.
I miss the days when you could buy 1 motherboard, then choose between Cyrix, Intel or AMD, depending on finances and performance.
Power consumption for Llano is nothing to write home about...it uses about the same power as the 2500k and is considerably slower.
We're comparing apples with martians here.
Didn't know where to put it and this thread was the last for the AMD Opteron Bulldozer so here we go,
AMD Brings Top Media to GLOBALFOUNDRIES Fab
John, i didn't get the invitation for this event![]()
