Amazing video and story of corrupt cop fabricating evidence and getting caught

Status
Not open for further replies.

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,280
1
0
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit rejected Officer Reichert’s qualified immunity claim and will allow Huff’s suit to go forward.

The video is thoroughly entertaining to watch and spells out in every detail what this corrupt cop did.

-------------------------------------

Washington Post News Article with Video Here

Video here if you don't want to read the whole news article.

Youtube Video with Journalist narrating
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
i remember hearing about this a while ago.

Civil Forfeiture laws NEED to change. With the department getting a cut of what is forfeited they look for insane ways to claim anything they can. Good for this guy for standing up and doing what he can.

edit: also there was a report that showed that drug dogs are not reliable. yet the courts still say they are. they are to easy to "train" for false positives.
 
Last edited:

unokitty

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2012
3,346
1
0
338-1122214746-highwayrobbery.jpg


Forbes: Policing for Profit

Americans are supposed to be innocent until proven guilty, but civil forfeiture turns that principle on its head. With civil forfeiture, your property is guilty until you prove it innocent. Civil forfeiture–where the police may seize property upon the mere suspicion that it may have some connection to criminal activity–threatens the property rights of all Americans. The overriding goal of police and prosecutors should be the fair and impartial administration of justice. Civil forfeiture laws at the federal level and in 42 states, however, dangerously shift law enforcement priorities instead toward policing for profit.
...
Most states and the federal government allow law enforcement agencies to keep 90 percent or more of the profits from assets they forfeit. This money may be used for better equipment, nicer offices, newer vehicles, trips to law enforcement conventions and–in states like Texas–even police salaries. Thus, law enforcement agencies benefit in a very direct way from every dollar in assets and currency they manage to seize and forfeit. This profit motive forms the rotten core of forfeiture abuse.
...
Finally, many states shift the burden of proof from the state to the owner to prove that he or she is innocent of the crime in forfeiture cases. In other words, with civil forfeiture, property owners are effectively guilty until proven innocent.

Ask yourself again, why isn't marijuana legal?

Uno
 

Mai72

Lifer
Sep 12, 2012
11,562
1,741
126
POS cop! I hope he loses his pension, job, and he spends 2 years in jail.

I had a good friend (Dave Romeo) that lost his police job in NJ because he physically abused two young kids. His family are cops. His father was known for abusing people. The problem is you can't do that now. Cameras are everywhere.

He lost his $70k a year job. He lost his pension. He lost everything. He is going to jail for 5 years.

After the suspects were subdued, lying face down and handcuffed behind their backs, Romeo arrived and kicked each defendant in the face or head two or three times.

You can read about it here: http://www.capemaycountyherald.com/...ice+sergeant+david+romeo039s+conviction+holds
 
Last edited:

JohnShadows

Member
Oct 16, 2012
85
10
71
Great video. I hope he takes the guy for a ride in court. And yes, this is a perfect example of the pitfalls of the "incentives system" of forfeiture, graned to cops in this country.

Here is a video in 2002 of an arrest he made. You can see his hands are on the teenager's throat. Definitely Napoleon complex. He's only 5"7 in. And he was always angry.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrjOKw7aApw
^^^ The video said dude's name was David Romeo (not Michael Reichert).
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,094
14,496
146
Blame Ronald Reagan for today's asset/civil forfeiture law abuse. It started during his administration's "War on Drugs."

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/drugs/special/forfeiture.html

This potential for abuse is compounded by the strong financial incentive that law enforcement has to make seizures--since they benefit directly from forfeited property. It was the passage of the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, part of the Reagan-era ramp-up in the war on drugs, that first made this possible. At a federal level, the law established two new forfeiture funds: one at the U.S. Department of Justice, which gets revenue from forfeitures done by agencies like the Drug Enforcement Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and another now run by the U.S. Treasury, which gets revenue from agencies like Customs and the Coast Guard. These funds could now be used for forfeiture-related expenses, payments to informants, prison building, equipment purchase, and other general law enforcement purposes.

But equally important, local law enforcement would now get a piece of the pie. Within the 1984 Act was a provision for so-called "equitable sharing", which allows local law enforcement agencies to receive a portion of the net proceeds of forfeitures they help make under federal law--and under current policy, that can be up to 80%. Previously, seized assets had been handed over to the federal government in their entirety.

Immediately following passage of the Act, federal forfeitures increased dramatically. The amount of revenue deposited into the Department of Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund, for example, soared from $27 million in 1985 to $644 million in 1991--a more than twenty-fold increase. And as forfeitures increased, so did the amount of money flowing back to state and local law enforcement through equitable sharing.

Some say that because of the resulting windfall, state and local law enforcement has become as addicted to forfeiture as an addict is to drugs--making property seizure no longer a means to an end, but an end in itself. In 1999 alone, approximately $300 million of the $957 million that the Treasury and Justice Department funds took in went back to the state and local departments that helped with the seizures. And since 1986, the Department of Justice's equitable sharing program has distributed over $2 billion in cash and property. Additional revenue comes from forfeitures done under state law, which adds to the total intake. According to a study by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, state and local law enforcement reported receiving a total of over $700 million in drug-related asset forfeiture revenue in 1997 alone--with some departments single-handedly taking in several million dollars for their own use.



One county in Nevada has really jumped on the bandwagon...

http://www.forbes.com/sites/institu...ions-from-drivers-never-charged-with-a-crime/

But as you see in that story, it's happening everywhere.
 

OverVolt

Lifer
Aug 31, 2002
14,278
89
91
I drive a crappy car. Helps to look poor, you don't get pulled over. But not *too* poor that you might be a desperate criminal in need of some searching. its a fine balance. A well-maintained older model economy car fits the bill.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.