Originally posted by: LOLyourFace
[edit]
Let me clarify certain things:
CREATIONISM =! CHRISTIANITY
Originally posted by: ActuaryTm
Seeking enlightenment in Off Topic could be likened to attempting to gain an understanding of physics from watching a toliet bowl:
there may be fundamentals that can be observed, but mostly it's just excrement being swished around.
Coriolis, perhaps?Originally posted by: rahvin
What are you saying about Coreallis?
Originally posted by: CVSiN
K how about this..
Adam and Eve were technically brother and sister of the worlds first family if you want to get technical...
they were related..
so we are all children of Insest if you follow this line of thinking...
how sick and twisted is that?
well come to think of it that would explain a great many things..
..
LoL becasue I think bible thumpers are morons does not make me 11 years old..
its taken me a grat many years to get this bitter about religion and the stupidity of beleiveing in something that is tatamount to santa claus for adults...
im 34..
i spent the first 8 years of my life in a Catholic school studied the bible fairly extensivly before comign to the conclusion that it is nothing but pure fiction based loosely on some events that may or may not have taken place..
It is not by any means a history book or anything proven in any way shape or form..
Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
My opinion is that what you said is backwards. Religion was created because the science at the time couldn't explain certain things. So in other words, its not that science can't comprehend religion, but rather religion can't (refuses to really) comprehend science.
If you look at history and how science has changed what was thought, it seems obvious that however begrudgingly it does so, religion will concede when science can prove something (remember things like thinking earth was at the center of the universe).
Oroginally posted by: CVSin
K how about this..
Adam and Eve were technically brother and sister of the worlds first family if you want to get technical...
they were related..
so we are all children of Insest if you follow this line of thinking...
how sick and twisted is that?
Originally posted by: midwestfisherman
Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
My opinion is that what you said is backwards. Religion was created because the science at the time couldn't explain certain things. So in other words, its not that science can't comprehend religion, but rather religion can't (refuses to really) comprehend science.
If you look at history and how science has changed what was thought, it seems obvious that however begrudgingly it does so, religion will concede when science can prove something (remember things like thinking earth was at the center of the universe).
Try reading this Science and the Bible. You may be able to find it at your local library.
Oroginally posted by: CVSin
K how about this..
Adam and Eve were technically brother and sister of the worlds first family if you want to get technical...
they were related..
so we are all children of Insest if you follow this line of thinking...
how sick and twisted is that?
That would be totally wrong. Adam and Eve were two seperately created beings. They were not brother and sister. :roll:
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: CVSiN
stupid bible thumping morons...
2 words..
PROVE IT...
or STFU..
there is more data supporting evolution than some stupid alien living in the "heavens" that said hey im bored..
POOF theres earth.. and theres 2 peeps to populate it" ... ya thats a smart freaking theory...
my proof...
#1 because that means everyone is related.. and who would want to be related to skyywalker.....
thats enough proof to debunk that idea if you ask me!
Id rather be related to King Freaking Kong or an ameba than Skyywalker...
Don't hold back man, let us know how you really feel 😀
Originally posted by: LOLyourFace
Sure, we have cars and computers, that's fvcking great.
But isn't it weird we have no single absolute answer regarding where we came from? All we have are theory this and theory that. The only possible idea we have is the ambigious Big Bang theory. Then one must ask where did the Big Bang come from?
Sometimes I wonder if religion is something our current science cannot comprehend rather than regrading as nonsense. ex) there IS science behind God and all, we just can't understand yet?
This isn't a religious post, just something to get your noodles going....
Wrong..
they are direct children of god.. he created them therefore he is thier parent they had not other parent therefore in creating life god is thier father and therefore they were brother and sister...
Originally posted by: CVSiN
K how about this..
Adam and Eve were technically brother and sister of the worlds first family if you want to get technical...
they were related..
so we are all children of Insest if you follow this line of thinking...
how sick and twisted is that?
well come to think of it that would explain a great many things..
..
LoL becasue I think bible thumpers are morons does not make me 11 years old..
its taken me a grat many years to get this bitter about religion and the stupidity of beleiveing in something that is tatamount to santa claus for adults...
im 34..
i spent the first 8 years of my life in a Catholic school studied the bible fairly extensivly before comign to the conclusion that it is nothing but pure fiction based loosely on some events that may or may not have taken place..
It is not by any means a history book or anything proven in any way shape or form..
Originally posted by: CVSiN
Originally posted by: midwestfisherman
Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
My opinion is that what you said is backwards. Religion was created because the science at the time couldn't explain certain things. So in other words, its not that science can't comprehend religion, but rather religion can't (refuses to really) comprehend science.
If you look at history and how science has changed what was thought, it seems obvious that however begrudgingly it does so, religion will concede when science can prove something (remember things like thinking earth was at the center of the universe).
Try reading this Science and the Bible. You may be able to find it at your local library.
Oroginally posted by: CVSin
K how about this..
Adam and Eve were technically brother and sister of the worlds first family if you want to get technical...
they were related..
so we are all children of Insest if you follow this line of thinking...
how sick and twisted is that?
That would be totally wrong. Adam and Eve were two seperately created beings. They were not brother and sister. :roll:
Wrong..
they are direct children of god.. he created them therefore he is thier parent they had not other parent therefore in creating life god is thier father and therefore they were brother and sister...
now if god made 1 and his his friend bob the god in training made the other.. then therefore they would not be related...
but in this case God created both beings... therefore they are indeed brother and sister under thier father god..
Originally posted by: fredtam
Originally posted by: CVSiN
Originally posted by: midwestfisherman
Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
My opinion is that what you said is backwards. Religion was created because the science at the time couldn't explain certain things. So in other words, its not that science can't comprehend religion, but rather religion can't (refuses to really) comprehend science.
If you look at history and how science has changed what was thought, it seems obvious that however begrudgingly it does so, religion will concede when science can prove something (remember things like thinking earth was at the center of the universe).
Try reading this Science and the Bible. You may be able to find it at your local library.
Oroginally posted by: CVSin
K how about this..
Adam and Eve were technically brother and sister of the worlds first family if you want to get technical...
they were related..
so we are all children of Insest if you follow this line of thinking...
how sick and twisted is that?
That would be totally wrong. Adam and Eve were two seperately created beings. They were not brother and sister. :roll:
Wrong..
they are direct children of god.. he created them therefore he is thier parent they had not other parent therefore in creating life god is thier father and therefore they were brother and sister...
now if god made 1 and his his friend bob the god in training made the other.. then therefore they would not be related...
but in this case God created both beings... therefore they are indeed brother and sister under thier father god..
uummm...no. Also there were several different "eves".. It should also be noted that "man" (a creature made in God's image) was created and not necassarily humans. This could imply that he simply added intelligence to a form that was already in existance. Also the bible pretty much says that people already inhabited the Earth.
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Okay, how about this: does it really matter? Does it affect any of us in any real, tangible way?
Originally posted by: jhu
Originally posted by: fredtam
Originally posted by: CVSiN
Originally posted by: midwestfisherman
Originally posted by: darkswordsman17
My opinion is that what you said is backwards. Religion was created because the science at the time couldn't explain certain things. So in other words, its not that science can't comprehend religion, but rather religion can't (refuses to really) comprehend science.
If you look at history and how science has changed what was thought, it seems obvious that however begrudgingly it does so, religion will concede when science can prove something (remember things like thinking earth was at the center of the universe).
Try reading this Science and the Bible. You may be able to find it at your local library.
Oroginally posted by: CVSin
K how about this..
Adam and Eve were technically brother and sister of the worlds first family if you want to get technical...
they were related..
so we are all children of Insest if you follow this line of thinking...
how sick and twisted is that?
That would be totally wrong. Adam and Eve were two seperately created beings. They were not brother and sister. :roll:
Wrong..
they are direct children of god.. he created them therefore he is thier parent they had not other parent therefore in creating life god is thier father and therefore they were brother and sister...
now if god made 1 and his his friend bob the god in training made the other.. then therefore they would not be related...
but in this case God created both beings... therefore they are indeed brother and sister under thier father god..
uummm...no. Also there were several different "eves".. It should also be noted that "man" (a creature made in God's image) was created and not necassarily humans. This could imply that he simply added intelligence to a form that was already in existance. Also the bible pretty much says that people already inhabited the Earth.
it depends on what text you use. if you just use the bible, the beginning of genesis notes that adam is made from dirt and eve was made from his rib.
You're right. Science simply cannot say where we began from.The only possible idea we have is the ambigious Big Bang theory. Then one must ask where did the Big Bang come from?