- Sep 6, 2000
- 25,383
- 1,013
- 126
Seems to me that one of the reasons, if not the main reason, that the U.S. lost the Vietnam War is that we insisted on playing only defense rather than offense. It simply became a conflict where our ability to win was premised on standing there and taking the punches, and hoping the other side's arm eventually got tired of hitting us.
So let's jump in the Wayback Machine and head for 1972, pre-Watergate. Operation Linebacker had been in play for months, and Hanoi's will basically broken after thousands of air sorties by B52s, which led to the North agreeing to a cease fire in October. And we all know how things wound up after that, if not google helicopters evacuating the American embassy in Saigon in 1975.
So how could we have actually fought Vietnam to win, rather than sitting there hoping the north would get tired of fighting?
So let's jump in the Wayback Machine and head for 1972, pre-Watergate. Operation Linebacker had been in play for months, and Hanoi's will basically broken after thousands of air sorties by B52s, which led to the North agreeing to a cease fire in October. And we all know how things wound up after that, if not google helicopters evacuating the American embassy in Saigon in 1975.
So how could we have actually fought Vietnam to win, rather than sitting there hoping the north would get tired of fighting?