Originally posted by: Insane3D
It's ok. Maybe it will be re-broadcast and I can record it. Thanks for trying....you damn liberal!
No problem there "Greeny" - go hug a tree
I think this is how I percieve these 3.
O'Reilly - He is a bulldog, just waiting to attack anyone and everyone, yet still knows who his master is so he bites maybe a little less frequently and with a little less vigor. Fair and Balanced? Ehhh maybe, depending on the subject I suppose. To portray him as a dirty right winger like Al was trying to paint him as - is a tad off. But hey, neither said they were perfect
which leads to...
Ivins- Wolf in sheep's clothing. She really tried to play nice and stay "above the fray" during the panel but sheep do bite sometimes - which she did. She also tries to protray herself as an "independant person" not labeled by political views - utter hogwash. She also strikes me as an Elitist who looks down her nose at everyone. But then during the call in part, she showed herself - a wolf who joined her pack(franken) and stalked her prey from the shadows.
Franken - Uhh well.... Ummm Can you say little whiny spoiled brat?
He probably has a point to some of his rantings, but he gets sooo caught up in them and himself that he ends up looking stupid. He spent over half his speach trying to bash O'Reilly over something that "could" have been an honest mistake. He also has no shame - it'll be interesting to read his book(if I can stomach his whining long enough to finish it). It will also be interesting to see if he can get his "liberal" show up and running, I have a feeling that it'll fall flat on it's face like the rest of the "liberal" attempts at a Rush Limbaugh type show(TV or Radio).
I don't watch O'Reilly because I don't watch TV often - maybe local news or if something cool is supposed to be on. I think Franken is a tad out of his league with his political aspirations, and would rather see him go back to comedy - which I find funny. I admit I don't know much about this Ivans broad but she strikes me as your typical author - a lot of idealism and hiding behind pages.
I'll be reading atleast 2 of the 3 books, Ivans is a maybe, only because I read "Landslide" by Mayer&McManus and I think those types of commentaries dwell on negativity. I'm not saying that things shouldn't be "aired" but they come across like a biography but with a negative slant. Aw heck - you and I both know I'll read it - who am I trying to kid
Seems as though the interweb hasn't killed the print industry...now has it
CkG