podspi
Golden Member
- Jan 11, 2011
- 1,982
- 102
- 106
Rory would say "you had me at employees..."
Hahah, low blow!

We will see how this all shakes out, but this (and the hiring of outside consultants) does not inspire confidence.
Rory would say "you had me at employees..."
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=74093&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1747465&highlight=The savings will be largely driven through a reduction of AMD's global workforce by approximately 15 percent, which is expected to be largely completed in the fourth quarter of 2012.
The savings will be largely driven through a reduction of AMD's global workforce by approximately 15 percent, which is expected to be largely completed in the fourth quarter of 2012.
Rory the Grinch said:So have a great Christmas and a happy new year, team
"Read has brought in a team of business consultants from McKinsey & Company and BCG (the former Boston Consulting Group) to advise the company on how to fix its business model. McKinsey’s role is said to involve identifying and handling the job cuts. BCG’s role is said by people familiar with the situation to be consulting on what has been described as a “grand strategy” to take the company forward."
What is Rorys job again?
Rory may be doing exactly what Dirk should have done - go get a second opinion on the sanity of the master strategy being pushed by the BoD and if the second opinion doesn't support the BoD then push on the BoD to perhaps go forth and educate themselves.
It is pretty obvious that the BoD wanted a puppet CEO, not one with a vision but one who would take direction. Dirk wouldn't. And it took the BoD some 8 months to find someone who would, even with the multi-million dollar golden carrot dangling in front of candidate after candidate.
The BoD may already be tired of Rory and are getting ready to shove him out. Otherwise Rory wouldn't need to bring in outsiders just to tell him to do the dirty work that the BoD wants him to do.
This may be Rory fighting for his own job in a way that Dirk simply wouldn't.
Also given AMD's low market cap and extensive IP, it wouldn't be surprising if somebody bought them up, shuttered x86, and remade them into an ARM SoC company. They have (almost?) all the non-cell IP for it.
Less than expected. At least something...
Are they able to design SOCs cost-effectively? The ARM ecosystem players seem to move much faster, and do designs with smaller teams than the historical CPU companies.
Rory may be doing exactly what Dirk should have done - go get a second opinion on the sanity of the master strategy being pushed by the BoD and if the second opinion doesn't support the BoD then push on the BoD to perhaps go forth and educate themselves.
I don't know if ARM really moves much faster though. How long have we had A9-class designs, and how much longer are we going to be stuck with them? Meanwhile Intel has new designs coming out more or less like clockwork.
Are they able to design SOCs cost-effectively?
Awesome, according to a blogger, Intel is supposed to degrade their performance because AMD doesn't have a register that's physically required for the Intel code path.
I guess that would mean that AMD's AVX implementation isn't fully compatible with Intel's. And that's somehow Intel's fault.
Wasn't there a court order or agreement of some sort that Intel wouldn't degrade AMD's performance with their compiler? Why isn't AMD making an issue about this? Most likely because there isn't an issue.
As always, AMD's problems are never of their own creation (not that this is one)...It's always Intel's fault.
The FTC settlement included a disclosure provision where Intel must:[29]
...publish clearly that its compiler discriminates against non-Intel processors (such as AMD's designs), not fully utilizing their features and producing inferior code. In compliance with this rule, Intel added an "optimization notice" to its compiler descriptions stating that they "do not optimize equally for non-Intel microprocessors" and that "certain compiler options for Intel compilers, including some that are not specific to Intel micro-architecture, are reserved for Intel microprocessors". [30]
Intel® compilers, associated libraries and associated development tools may or may not optimize to the same degree for non-Intel microprocessors for optimizations that are not unique to Intel microprocessors. These optimizations include Intel® Streaming SIMD Extensions 2 (Intel® SSE2), Intel® Streaming SIMD Extensions 3 (Intel® SSE3), and Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extensions 3 (Intel® SSSE3) instruction sets and other optimizations.
Rory may be doing exactly what Dirk should have done - go get a second opinion on the sanity of the master strategy being pushed by the BoD and if the second opinion doesn't support the BoD then push on the BoD to perhaps go forth and educate themselves.
It is pretty obvious that the BoD wanted a puppet CEO, not one with a vision but one who would take direction. Dirk wouldn't. And it took the BoD some 8 months to find someone who would, even with the multi-million dollar golden carrot dangling in front of candidate after candidate.
The BoD may already be tired of Rory and are getting ready to shove him out. Otherwise Rory wouldn't need to bring in outsiders just to tell him to do the dirty work that the BoD wants him to do.
This may be Rory fighting for his own job in a way that Dirk simply wouldn't.
Well, at least the layoffs are less than the 20-30% flaunted elsewhere on the web. Still, down 25% YoY, bad news! The only bright spot was graphics, but that was down as well.
The board appears to have an obsession with tablets, after seeing the success Qualcomm has had. It was on their watch that AMD sold ATI's mobile graphics division to Qualcomm.
I'd always thought that at the time, AMD had two options: 1) turn off the lights and tell everyone to go home 2) sell off absolutely anything they could (even if it had to be at lowball prices), keep the lights on, and hope that the products they continued working on would turn out ok. Was there more to it?The board appears to have an obsession with tablets, after seeing the success Qualcomm has had. It was on their watch that AMD sold ATI's mobile graphics division to Qualcomm.
(In a cute move, the graphics core was changed to Adreno, an anagram of Radeon.)
Maybe management is starting to realize that rushing through a tablet design was about as smart as melting down pots and door knobs to make "steel." Their silence on Kaveri has been noted, but management has been equally silent on Samara.
I'd always thought that at the time, AMD had two options: 1) turn off the lights and tell everyone to go home 2) sell off absolutely anything they could (even if it had to be at lowball prices), keep the lights on, and hope that the products they continued working on would turn out ok. Was there more to it?