Anarchist420
Diamond Member
what do you think the declaration meant when it said "all men are created equal"?
i really think that jefferson did mean all white men were created 90-99% equal even though it's not so much white as it is your mtdna... if your mtdna hg is UK (and perhaps hgs D, A, and maybe another east asian one that isn't found in subsaharans or australian aboriginals) then you are not descended from cromagnon/apes/a woman out of africa. unfortunately, thomas jefferson didn't realize that when he wrote the Declaration of Independence.
but anyway, you know that he believed all white men were created with enough reasoning ability to be self-sufficient. he loved reasoning, didnt have much tolerance for those who couldnt reason and he didn't like blacks or women because he thought they couldn't reason and he also didnt like the way i look or the odors i exude.
you also know that he believed all white men were created very close to equal because he did not try to force uniformity like national socialist hamilton and washington did with the constitution and the "stamping out of individuality" in the continental army respectively... jefferson believed that a nation-state was not necessary (until much later after the declaration) because he believed that all men who could reason would be able to get along and be self-sufficient without a master unlike what hamilton believed.
so the lesson to be learned is that the french revolution was not right, violent revolution is not good (the Declaration of Independence was secessionist, not violently revolutionary as nowhere in it does it say that people needed to be murdered), and that coups in attempt to force uniformity are not good.
so what i am trying to say?
i am trying to tell people to realize that the state is neither necessary and isn't good because it is an irrational agent that people have mixed feelings about. it is not more than half necessary because those who can reason will take care of themselves and some other people voluntarily, those who cant survive chaos will saved or damned depending upon their blood, and those violent rebels and tyrants can then choose whether they want to be the tree of liberty's natural manure and half the world couldn't even half way conceptualize what a State was and would never know the difference. sure some people would might go separate ways once the State hierarchy collapses, mother nature might call some to supernature, the eternal fatherland may call others, some may just go right back into the soil from whence they originally came, but natural law is not necessarily for the State. think about the people who have been oppressed abroad by u.s. govt intervention that is like a death ship from mars to them.
that said, no one should be forced, at gun point, to pay for someone else's protection because then it isnt protection for everyone and the sooner people voluntarily live by that, the better humanity will be.
i really think that jefferson did mean all white men were created 90-99% equal even though it's not so much white as it is your mtdna... if your mtdna hg is UK (and perhaps hgs D, A, and maybe another east asian one that isn't found in subsaharans or australian aboriginals) then you are not descended from cromagnon/apes/a woman out of africa. unfortunately, thomas jefferson didn't realize that when he wrote the Declaration of Independence.
but anyway, you know that he believed all white men were created with enough reasoning ability to be self-sufficient. he loved reasoning, didnt have much tolerance for those who couldnt reason and he didn't like blacks or women because he thought they couldn't reason and he also didnt like the way i look or the odors i exude.
you also know that he believed all white men were created very close to equal because he did not try to force uniformity like national socialist hamilton and washington did with the constitution and the "stamping out of individuality" in the continental army respectively... jefferson believed that a nation-state was not necessary (until much later after the declaration) because he believed that all men who could reason would be able to get along and be self-sufficient without a master unlike what hamilton believed.
so the lesson to be learned is that the french revolution was not right, violent revolution is not good (the Declaration of Independence was secessionist, not violently revolutionary as nowhere in it does it say that people needed to be murdered), and that coups in attempt to force uniformity are not good.
so what i am trying to say?
i am trying to tell people to realize that the state is neither necessary and isn't good because it is an irrational agent that people have mixed feelings about. it is not more than half necessary because those who can reason will take care of themselves and some other people voluntarily, those who cant survive chaos will saved or damned depending upon their blood, and those violent rebels and tyrants can then choose whether they want to be the tree of liberty's natural manure and half the world couldn't even half way conceptualize what a State was and would never know the difference. sure some people would might go separate ways once the State hierarchy collapses, mother nature might call some to supernature, the eternal fatherland may call others, some may just go right back into the soil from whence they originally came, but natural law is not necessarily for the State. think about the people who have been oppressed abroad by u.s. govt intervention that is like a death ship from mars to them.
that said, no one should be forced, at gun point, to pay for someone else's protection because then it isnt protection for everyone and the sooner people voluntarily live by that, the better humanity will be.
