Okay. Simple logic here.
Opinion=objective
objective!=truth
truth==fact
Opinion != fact
You're going on like opinion is something that needs to be explained with empirical evidence. What do you CARE if someone has a different opinion than you do?
Why do you insist that we PROVE to you why we feel the way we do? Why does it matter?
I'm bashing you because you are acting like a huge asshole.
Lets go back here for a second and look at what rh71 said:
This was a fairly reasonable post. Now lets look at your foaming-at-the-mouth counter attack:
You started with the personal attacks Nik. Now I don't know rh71, never interacted with him but I'm just pointing out some basic facts here.
I forgot the winking smiley face at the end of the line. It wasn't meant seriously. No go find a hobby. :roll:
He's not pointing out FACT, he's pointing out OPINION. I actually find this humorous. Please, do go on.
waggy
No Lifer
- Dec 14, 2000
- 68,143
- 10
- 81
my god you are coming of ass a retard. really you are. usually you have better arguments then this.
you are having a hissy fit because someone posted a opinion that is different then yours. you are acting like my 3 year old daughter. damn man grow up.
Not everyone is going to like what you like. Not everyone is going to think she is hot. I personally think she is great looking but at times comes off as a really dumb person. I personally feel she is also over rated.
she is great eye candy though. wouldn't kick her out of bed for eating crackers! HM
DrPizza
Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Sorry, I didn't mean just you, rh. It's the back and forth fighting over this that's ridiculous. Personally, I don't think it's possible to judge the intelligence or lack of intelligence of most of the celebrities. Reason: we only get to see a glimpse of their lives; and those glimpses aren't random - they're selected by someone else. Not only that, but many of them have agents that tell them how to behave in public - so even when you think you're getting a candid view of how they "really" are, it may just as well be an act. Heck, suppose that rather than publishing the Gettysburg Address, newspapers showed a picture of Lincoln banged his head on the top of the doorway of the train, knocking his hat off, people's opinion could have been "what a buffoon."
She's good looking, there's no denying that. Although, again, there are more than enough morons in this forum who will state otherwise. Personally, her particular 'look' isn't what I find attractive *to me*, but I won't say that she's not hot - that would just be retarded. But, to judge these people's intelligence and personalities, based upon interviews on television, is unfair. Sure, you can get a rough idea, but many people behave differently when in such situations as interviews. When people know they're being recorded, they can put on or attempt to put on a completely different persona. And, if someone wants to make them look like an idiot, all you need to do is edit out their responses which show incredible insight and leave in responses such as "chicken of the sea" which are taken completely out of the context in which that actual response was made.
LOL now your adding things in later. No one knew this was a joke.
Your hopeless man, anyways I have better things to do then entertain you.
Perhaps what got rh71 so angry was the personal attacks that you use so many times.
Did I edit my post after you said that? No. I was clarifying my intentions. What, so now what I really mean gets determined by everyone else instead? So if you take something the wrong way, I'm not allowed to say "no, I didn't mean it like that. Here's how I meant it..."?
Where are all these "personal attacks" against RH71 that I've apparently "used so many times" huh? Ya know, you probably shouldn't accuse me of something that anyone who actually reads the thread would be able to debunk. Hey, why don't you do that? Why don't you go through this thread and copy/paste every personal attack of mine against RH71?
He's not even angry, either. How do you know that he's angry? Do you think it impossible to have an involved, heated discussion without popping a vein out of your forehead while you type?
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Can everyone just :lips: and makeup?
only if you'll wear pink for me :heart:
mrSHEiK124
Lifer
- Mar 6, 2004
- 11,488
- 2
- 0
EXACTLY!
God, rh71 and Nik are acting like BABIES. You both know you'd hit it (either one of them) until you broke something, stop arguing about and defending people you have 0 association with like you're their fvcking lawyers or something, grow the hell up.
/rant
That's a horrible chop, but that's still a great rack
Ah, so I see you're going to leave DivideBYZero and others out of it. Tell me, why narrow it down to just RH71 and I?
Besides, I'm not the one acting like a child. I simply gave my opinion. RH71 jumped all over most people here who have a differing opinion, demanding PROOF (I WANT PROOF, DAMMIT!) as to why we hold the opinions that we do, and completely discrediting our opinions when we refused to play his childish games :roll:
mrSHEiK124
Lifer
- Mar 6, 2004
- 11,488
- 2
- 0
I'm not about to join this argument, I only read 1 page and skipped to the last and saw more of the same, if you're going to whine and complain then I'll go right ahead and edit the post. And again, they are both fscking hot, and anyone here that wouldn't hit has weird standards.Originally posted by: Nik
That's a horrible chop, but that's still a great rack
Ah, so I see you're going to leave DivideBYZero and others out of it. Tell me, why narrow it down to just RH71 and I?
Besides, I'm not the one acting like a child. I simply gave my opinion. RH71 jumped all over most people here who have a differing opinion, demanding PROOF (I WANT PROOF, DAMMIT!) as to why we hold the opinions that we do, and completely discrediting our opinions when we refused to play his childish games :roll:
Well, a lot has been said through the argument. Are you the type that judges a book based on the inside-cover summary?
There are a lot of people who think Julia Roberts is absolutely beautiful. However, there are also others that can't get passed the concept that she has a mouth the size of a horse and that's a huge turn-off for them. Great legs, smokin ass, curvy hips, hot rack, and then *BAM* huge-ass mouth and folks cringe.
It's all a matter of *opinion* and *personal preference* which is what RH71's getting up-in-arms about. He refuses to accept the idea that folks have different opinions and expects those who have differing opinions to provide proof about how they came to that conclusion. However, if someone were to actually play along with his ruse, they'll most likely find themselves in yet another argument about how the basis for their opinion is also false, blah blah blah.
Since "Alba" in Spanish means "Dawn" in English, and is skewing the google results, you must use "Jessica Alba" vs. "Alizee".
Alizee wins by a (pubic) hair
DivideBYZero
Lifer
- May 18, 2001
- 24,117
- 2
- 0
DivideBYZero
Lifer
- May 18, 2001
- 24,117
- 2
- 0
An in-thread post parody. You have the imagination of a skunk. On Sleeping tablets. In a swimming pool.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 21K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter