Question Alder Lake - Official Thread

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Markfw

CPU Moderator, VC&G Moderator, Elite Member
Super Moderator
May 16, 2002
24,364
13,461
136
@igor_kavinski

Stirring the pot doesn't achieve much. For nerds that look at the low level specs know what is what and ignore the marketing. When you dive into the specs and benchmarks those things are usually pointed out. The average consumer though doesn't care and buys whatever the under informed sales person advises them on.

Sales people in most environments don't know jack about the technology beyond the tag on the shelf. Some might have a small amount of info if they're interested enough to dig deeper but, stores don't provide much info on products. If someone is spending $400 on a CPU they probably did some homework on it before doing so. Or they're buying some prebuilt POS from Best Buy or Wal-Mart.
BUT... Companies buying server hardware are not so dumb.... Anymore. And between the people that have a clue on hardware, and the companies that have a clue buying server hardware, it can really hurt over time. Today is an example. Microsoft, and several businesses buying supercomputers are buying AMD. Many users are still buying AMD. If Intel doesn't "wake up and smell the roses" and stop with the marketing crap, and actually start providing some good hardware, their days are numbered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drazick

Markfw

CPU Moderator, VC&G Moderator, Elite Member
Super Moderator
May 16, 2002
24,364
13,461
136
Buddy, you're wasting your time here. It's a lost cause trying to get certain people to understand the mass consumer market vs. a niche product. All the bankruptcy and Intel is dead! talks have been going on for a good 5 years. Not to mention that it's totally derailing the thread regarding the actual product and technology that people want to talk about. It's also spun into some Intel vs. AMD non-sense that has nothing to do with the actual conversation in general.
Derailing the thread ? Talking about Alder Lake, right ? Yes, the insanity behind the 12900KS ? Why don't you respond with something on-topic about this product, instead of personal insults. I guess you can't do that, as you have a personal agenda here.
 

epsilon84

Golden Member
Aug 29, 2010
1,142
927
136
What matters for gaming is not all out all core speed of 5.2Ghz, but more likely 5.5Ghz ST core, so advantage in clock speed is in range of 15-22% in gaming, probably nearer 22% in most games.
Still 96MB of L3 has merits of it's own, and i fully expect some games will love it, and there will still be more games where 99 percentile FPS will be better on X3D chip.
True, I'm just using the all core turbo as a baseline figure, the 5800X3D will also have a higher ST boost as well, but its just the relative difference in clockspeed/IPC vs the 96MB L3 that will determine which CPU comes out ahead in games.
 

Markfw

CPU Moderator, VC&G Moderator, Elite Member
Super Moderator
May 16, 2002
24,364
13,461
136
Here we go again. The 12900K(S) is "useless" because 8p+8e cores don't beat a 16c 5950x in overall multithreaded workloads, and it loses to a yet to be reviewed 5800X3D. Are you seeing your bias here? I mean do you read what you type? Or, do I always have to step in and point out the bias to you? Whether you like it or not, the best all-round processor right now is ADL. Usually, you want to see reputable reviews before making your opinion known, right? RIGHT? Biased much?
Look at the posts below yours. Many here think the 5800X3D may very well beat the 12900KS, not just me. I am a realist, not a blinded Intel fan.

Biased much ? Do you own both ? No. Do I ? Yes ! And the power draw ?? Everybody knows thats the 12900KS will be a power hog and hot. Its right in the techpowerup title. Best all round ? Show me a review that says that. Everything I read says mixed bag, and thats before the 5800X3D for gaming. I admit right now ADL is best for gaming, but not productivity, and that aligns with most reviews.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drazick

Markfw

CPU Moderator, VC&G Moderator, Elite Member
Super Moderator
May 16, 2002
24,364
13,461
136
And all that is false. All the things that are not multithreaded don't consume more than 142 watts on ADL. And why 142 watts? Don't you see what he's doing?
To be clear, I was talking about benchmarks, that at full power in benchmarks (multi-threaded usually) the 5950x only does 142 watts, and wins MOST of them.

By comparison, My 12700F does sometimes 300 watts with all threads going, and usually at least 200. And my criticism of the 12900k and 12900ks is mostly about high power consumption and heat. I need a big tower cooler for my 12700F.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drazick

Markfw

CPU Moderator, VC&G Moderator, Elite Member
Super Moderator
May 16, 2002
24,364
13,461
136
That's a very different argument than the one you've been spending most of your time on. If you'd left it at that, we wouldn't be having this discussion at all.
Its the way you interpret my posts. I have to be very clear sometimes not to be misquoted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drazick

AdamK47

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
14,562
2,107
126

Windows 11 Search bar being slowed down by E-cores.

Also found this: Workload balancing on E-cores seems strange on desktop - Microsoft Tech Community

E-cores should really be called V-cores (vampire cores) coz they suck the performance out of your workloads.
Running a base clock over 100MHz skews memory results in AIDA64 making it look much higher than they should be. The developers call it a bug. I believe they have their own made up formula assuming people run a 100MHz base clock.
 

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
8,784
2,426
136
www.teamjuchems.com
I really want Alder Lake to be great, but…

I am suspicious the platform (chipsets), ram and maybe even the combination of cores (while I like the 6C all P core CPU, I think adding four E cores and having 16 total threads would be the sweet spot) this time next year will be more compelling.

Excited to read reviews that might change my mind! :)
 

UsandThem

Elite Member
Super Moderator
May 4, 2000
16,069
7,366
146

Zucker2k

Golden Member
Feb 15, 2006
1,810
1,159
136
I think Intel going with DDR5 for reviews (do they really have a choice?) means that overall, DDR5 provides better performance than DDR4 across the board. The jury is still out on DDR4 vs DDR5 on gaming, but looking at the fact that Intel even chose to support DDR4 on the new platform probably means it has its uses, outside of financial considerations for consumers, and especially, enthusiasts.
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
13,047
4,303
136
When Skylake launched with DDR4, they still had a limited number of boards that supported DDR3:

https://www.anandtech.com/show/9483/intel-skylake-review-6700k-6600k-ddr4-ddr3-ipc-6th-generation/7

It appears to be a similar situation this time with DDR5.
Right now on Newegg they have 12 DDR4 boards versus 11 DDR5. We'll have to see what people choose but it's definately not going to be like Skylake's limited DDR3L support.

Big diff is that DDR4 had been available on the market for a year when Skylake was released.
 

dweilbacher

Member
Mar 12, 2003
132
0
76
I have not built a PC in a while (since 4th Gen intel). So it is time. The Alder Lake appears to be the right upgrade for me. PCI 5, DDR5. And I'm very interested/curious about the P / E Cores performance. Should be a fun build.
 

KompuKare

Senior member
Jul 28, 2009
901
683
136
Is it true that we are finally getting ECC standard on DDR5 DIMMs? I thought that I had read that somewhere.
Sort of. If you are a marketeer.
DDR5 modules can have internal ECC. But that's not the same as proper ECC and I don't think the modules can signal anything to the CPU's memory controller about any errors.
What this seems to be more about, is that if the memory chips are run at high speeds which might cause errors, they can try to detect or correct those, AFAIK.
So I'd consider this more like how multi-layer NAND can and has to do error checking.
 

phillyman36

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2004
1,756
160
106
I wound up ordering
12900k PreOrder Newegg
Asus z690 Hero Pre order Newegg
Corsair Dominator 2x16 ddr5 5200Mhz (cl36) ram Directly from Corsair
I sold some of my old pc equipment so the money went towards Alder Lake. Ram should be here by Wednesday at the latest.

I'm either going to put it in my Corsair 680x case with a Noctua D15 Chromax black or in my Lian Li O11 dynamic xl case with the Galahad 360 AIo. (I have the lga 1700 mounting brackets for both.) For those getting it you doing air or water cooling? I leaning towards air since im probably not going to overclock. (unless someone gives me a good reason to go aio instead)
Once its set up ill probably sell my 5900x rig for more money for a second rig. ( I know someone will ask but the 5900x with the dark hero has been a headache for me usb disconnects memory error post codes of 40 even under default.) Im off the 4th and 5th so hopefully Newegg ships early so i can put it together.
 

Hougy

Member
Jan 13, 2021
70
50
61
Looks like all the K chips will be based on the 8+8 die. So will the 6 core die be used only for locked, low frequency chips? Will they also bin these chips or will they waste the golden samples? Why?
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY