Alcohol, email and calling P-BO a p***k..

[preslove]

That's a stupid thing to do. Most everyone does.

found that 60 percent of people lied at least once during a 10-minute conversation and told an average of two to three lies.

Are you really this stupid? You have no respect for truth?

Your OP is an obvious lie, and your rejoinder is that "hey, everybody lies?"

So, you wouldn't have a problem with me saying "highland145 abuses kids and animals?" 'Cause, everybody lies, right?

 

[thepd7]

Ouch. That's pretty harsh. I don't like this at all, but we don't HAVE to let somebody into the country. Kid learned consequences of his decisions though.

exactly. Honestly, why would you want to let someone in the country who was any sort of threat to the president? If I called the president of france a moron in an email I wouldn't expect to be welcome in France.

Considering he's saying "he can't remember" the email, but nothing is stopping him from checking his sent box, I'm pretty confident that the little limey prick is lying & leaving out actual threats to the president.

this

 

[preslove]

exactly. Honestly, why would you want to let someone in the country who was any sort of threat to the president? If I called the president of france a moron in an email I wouldn't expect to be welcome in France.

I don't know about "moron," but if you emailed them and said "Your president is a moronic frog and if I saw him in one of your prissy cafes I would kick his stupid french ass," the bold part should get you banned from France. I'm betting that this is the type of language the stupid kid wrote and what he omitted in the tabloid story.

 

[Jeeebus]

We're all missing the important part of the story.

This kid should be banned from the USA regardless of what he said in his email. We've already far exceeded our allowable quota of popped-collar douchebags, and therefore he'll sadly never get join his long-lost brothers across the pond in New Jersey.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...d-US-sending-Barack-Obama-abusive-e-mail.html

 

[highland145]

First, you post this ridiculous crap, like I should be omniscient.

Well, you didn't put in that the kid is most likely lying...

I link you to a study showing the obvious stupidity of said post without being a dickhead about it. And here's your response.

Are you really this stupid? You have no respect for truth?

Your OP is an obvious lie, and your rejoinder is that "hey, everybody lies?"

...gets you banned from America for life. I assume that was prick. No freedom of speech outside the U.S. What happens if I call him a prick?
Show me the lies.

So, you wouldn't have a problem with me saying "highland145 abuses kids and animals?" 'Cause, everybody lies, right?

You can say what you like about me. That doesn't make it true or false. It just shows that your mouth is open.

 

[preslove]

First, you post this ridiculous crap, like I should be omniscient.

I link you to a study showing the obvious stupidity of said post without being a dickhead about it. And here's your response.

...gets you banned from America for life. I assume that was prick. No freedom of speech outside the U.S. What happens if I call him a prick?
Show me the lies.

You can say what you like about me. That doesn't make it true or false. It just shows that your mouth is open.

Do you actually believe any of this actually makes logical sense? lol

And your link was about small, white lies, said in casual conversations, not lies about threatening the President of the United States in and email to Whitehouse.gov. The fact that you can't grasp the difference makes you one of the stupidest posters I've seen on these boards. I mean, you actually believe that your link had ANYTHING to do with this story? Jesus, you're dumb.

 

[highland145]

Do you actually believe any of this actually makes logical sense? lol

And your link was about small, white lies, said in casual conversations, not lies about threatening the President of the United States in and email to Whitehouse.gov. The fact that you can't grasp the difference makes you one of the stupidest posters I've seen on these boards. I mean, you actually believe that your link had ANYTHING to do with this story? Jesus, you're dumb.

It's really about your opinion of the story and I would grant it's valid. But since there are at least 3 sides to every story, yours is still just an opinion.

Secondly, find me a 17 year old that understands the ramifications of what he did and that wouldn't lie about it, assuming he threatened the potus.

And your link was about small, white lies

I think I've read this somewhere recently.
Are you really this stupid? You have no respect for truth?

 

[preslove]

It's really about your opinion of the story and I would grant it's valid. But since there are at least 3 sides to every story, yours is still just an opinion.

Secondly, find me a 17 year old that understands the ramifications of what he did and that wouldn't lie about it, assuming he threatened the potus.

The story you posted was lifted from, and linked to this Sun (a british tabloid that is famous for its topless models on page 3) story:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3135327/Obama-rant-Brit-banned-from-US-for-life.html

A Beds Police spokesman said: "The individual sent an email to the White House full of abusive and threatening language. We were informed by the Metropolitan Police and went to see him. He said, 'Oh dear, it was me'."

Look at the bold. And the kid is most definitely lying about not remembering what he wrote, when he could just open up his sent message folder.

I think I've read this somewhere recently.
Are you really this stupid? You have no respect for truth?

It's pretty hilarious just how significantly you misunderstood the U of Amherst study you linked to.

 

[highland145]

The story you posted was lifted from, and linked to this Sun (a british tabloid that is famous for its topless models on page 3) story:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3135327/Obama-rant-Brit-banned-from-US-for-life.html

A Beds Police spokesman said: "The individual sent an email to the White House full of abusive and threatening language. We were informed by the Metropolitan Police and went to see him. He said, 'Oh dear, it was me'."

Look at the bold. And the kid is most definitely lying about not remembering what he wrote, when he could just open up his sent message folder.

Let me get this straight. 1st you bash the Sun for trashy reporting(naked women) and then you quote them to try and make a point that wasn't even in the op? It's becoming clearer.

It's pretty hilarious just how significantly you misunderstood the U of Amherst study you linked to.

I see. The little lies aren't really lies at all and the big lies...Well, all truths are self relevant.

 

[preslove]

Let me get this straight. 1st you bash the Sun for trashy reporting(naked women) and then you quote them to try and make a point that wasn't even in the op? It's becoming clearer.

They're trashy for printing it without having the teenager forward the email to them.

I see. The little lies aren't really lies at all and the big lies...Well, all truths are self relevant.

The study in your link focused on "casual conversations," and did not differentiate between small lies (agreeing with someone that they liked something) and big lies (fabricating stories). Now, this study is only relevant to this conversation if an "Interview with a reporter" is the same thing as a "casual conversation." But they aren't the same thing, which is a truth that is self evident. Well, to anyone who isn't a moron.

Jesus, dude, words are hard to come by that can accurately describe the level of stupidity that you're displaying in this thread. I'm going to have start using a thesaurus, at this rate.

 

[highland145]

You post this.

Well, you didn't put in that the kid is most likely lying...

And then this.

Are you really this stupid? You have no respect for truth?

Your OP is an obvious lie, and your rejoinder is that "hey, everybody lies?"

Then you bash and quote the Sun to make your non existent point that I'm lying.

Then

They'retrashy for printing it without having the teenager forward the email to them.

A new thought on the old "sent mail" one, but has nothing to do with my "lying". Show me. Maybe you could find one of those little white lies that don't count when respecting the truth.

The study in your link focused on "casual conversations," and did not differentiate between small lies (agreeing with someone that they liked something) and big lies (fabricating stories). Now, this study is only relevant to this conversation if an "Interview with a reporter" is the same thing as a "casual conversation." But they aren't the same thing, which is a truth that is self evident.Well, to anyone who isn't a moron.

Jesus, dude, words are hard to come by that can accurately describe the level of stupidity that you're displaying in this thread. I'm going to have start using a thesaurus, at this rate.

I stick with my original post with your truths are self relevant.

The name calling started in your second post and then I realized something else was at play. Which one was it that you didn't like? Or none of them?

 

[Jeeebus]

you two know this forum does support private messages, right?

I feel like we're all bearing witness to some kind of weird foreplay here.

 

[DougK62]

We don't know the contents of the email. For all we know he made threats. I really don't see what the problem is - this is what national security is for, right?

 

[highland145]

you two know this forum does support private messages, right?

I feel like we're all bearing witness to some kind of weird foreplay here.

But you're watching.:sneaky:

 

[alkemyst]

Damn Preslove has a chance at some nookie and now he's all baller.

I am a bit pissed his L&R topic was given right to call both me and Nik out in the thread title as misogynist and cheater.

*cry*

 

[preslove]

Damn Preslove has a chance at some nookie and now he's all baller.

I am a bit pissed his L&R topic was given right to call both me and Nik out in the thread title as misogynist and cheater.

*cry*

That was pretty slick, right? But this is actually on-topic


Highland145: I have work to get to. "Self relevant truth" is not a thing. Your writing displays a shocking absence of clarity of thought. You have no grasp of logic, that I can tell. Go to P&N, it's where idiots like you belong.

 

[highland145]

Highland145: I have work to get to. "Self relevant truth" is not a thing. Your writing displays a shocking absence of clarity of thought. You have no grasp of logic, that I can tell. Go to P&N, it's where idiots like you belong.

Just waiting on you to back up you assertion that I was lying.