• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Albatron GeForce Ti4200 3.3ns vs. Radeon 9600 Pro?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Cindy, you obviously didnt read my post, and thank you so much for calling me an idiot. What I said was, if you arent going to be using high IQ settings, which you really cant on the 9600 Pro and get high framerates, then you should go with the 4200 and overclock because it is faster and cheaper.

You seem to be totally blind to the precise question he was asking. In this situation the Ti4200 is the better value.

Dont post any meaningless VGA charts from Toms or anything because we are talking about OVERCLOCKING performance WITHOUT any IQ settings.
 
Originally posted by: akshayt
Any 128mb fx 5600series card will beat any ti 4200.
Any 128mb radeon series card except se models will beat the fx 5600series.
Click to expand...
No and no. In almost all non aa/af tests the ti4200 is faster than the fx5600. Also, a 5600 is generally faster than a 128mb 9200.

Originally posted by: cindy22
who buys mid to high end cards and doesn't use aa/af with higher res nowadays?
Click to expand...
It might help to actually read the thread before replying
rolleye.gif


Originally posted by: RussianSensation
I personally think that at 1600x1200 with noAA/2 or 4AF games look much better than at 1024x768 4AA/8AF
Click to expand...
 
but you have to remember that he is useing a 8500, and those have some pretty weak aa and af for him to judge by.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top