• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

al-Zarqawi reportedly arrested in Iraq

Trizzay

Senior member
I know Drudge isn't always the most reliable source, but this would be great news if true:

http://www.drudgereport.com/flashai.htm


URGENT: 'TARGET #1': al-Zarqawi reportedly arrested in Iraq
Tue Jan 04 2005 09:49:47 ET

DUBAI, January 4 (Itar-Tass) - Abu Mus'ab al-Zarqawi, whom the US occupation authorities declared to be the "target number one" in Iraq, has been arrested in the city of Baakuba, the Emirate newspaper al-Bayane reported on Tuesday referring to Kurdish sources. Al-Zarqawi, leader of the terrorist group Al-Tawhid Wa'al-Jihad, was recently appointed the director of the Al-Qaeda organisation in Iraq.

The newspaper's correspondent in Baghdad points out that a report on the seizure of the terrorist, on whom the US put a bounty of 10 million dollars, was also reported by Iraqi Kurdistan radio, which at one time had been the first to announce the arrest of Saddam Hussein.

There have been no official reports about the arrest of the terrorist. Al-Zarqawi, 38, a Jordanian, whose real name is Ahmad al-Khalayleh, aims to turn Iraq into a "new Afghanistan". According to Arab press data, Al-Tawhid Wa'al-Jihad group has divided Iraq into several emirates. The group's independent subdivisions at a strength of 50 to 500 militants operate in the cities of Al-Falluja, Al-Qaim, Diala, and Samarra.

The personnel of the group is on the whole 1,500-strong and includes Iraqis and citizens of Arab and Islamic countries. There are demolition experts and missilemen among them.

The group has depots of weapons and explosives in various parts of the country. It intends to frustrate the upcoming parliamentary elections that are scheduled for the end of this month. Al-Tawhid Wa'al-Jihad threatens to do away with Iraqi Prime Minister Ayad Allawi and members of the interim government.

Developing...
 
UPDATE //
Tue Jan 04 2005 11:18:47 ET

U.S. military and intelligence sources are denying print and broadcast reports that terrorist Abu-Musab al-Zarqawi has been arrested in Iraq, MSNBC reported Tuesday.

MSNBC said senior U.S. military and intelligence sources told it the reports are not true. A newspaper in the United Arab Emirates, al-Bayane, reported in its Tuesday edition that the Jordanian-born terrorist had been arrested in Baqouba, Iraq. Iraqi Kurdistan radio also reported the arrest of al-Zarqawi.

The U.S. military in December said al-Zarqawi likely is in the Baghdad area.
 
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
2nd Source of arrest

First was from a Chinese Mainland Paper - questionable reliability.

I doubt that they caught the Boogy Man.


China paper credits
ABU DHABI, Jan. 4 (Xinhuanet) -- Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the Jordanian terrorist mastermind, was captured in Iraq, reported Tuesday Al Bayan, a daily newspaper of the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

Al-Zarqawi was captured in Iraq's eastern city of Baquba, a journalist with the newspaper said Monday, citing Iraq's Kurdish sources.

The Iraqi government has yet to confirm the news.

Some reporter may have jumped the gun by getting a name wrong.

 
Originally posted by: TravisT
How accurate is Drudgereport.com? I would be so happy if this was true.

A total crapshoot on breaking news like this.

Also, remember, Drudge is rather pro-Bush.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: TravisT
How accurate is Drudgereport.com? I would be so happy if this was true.

A total crapshoot on breaking news like this.

Also, remember, Drudge is rather pro-Bush.



Drudge is pro-bush? You mean Drudge isnt part of the elite liberal media, i think thats what you meant. Anyways, drudge is quoting another source. White house has denied they captured him, and drudge has also reported that.
 
Well, i suppose all we can do is keep our fingers crossed. I would be suprised if they were able to take him alive. I guess I was suprised when Saddam was captured as well though. *Crosses fingers*
 
Originally posted by: FallenHero96
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: TravisT
How accurate is Drudgereport.com? I would be so happy if this was true.

A total crapshoot on breaking news like this.

Also, remember, Drudge is rather pro-Bush.



Drudge is pro-bush? You mean Drudge isnt part of the elite liberal media, i think thats what you meant. Anyways, drudge is quoting another source. White house has denied they captured him, and drudge has also reported that.
No, there is no elite, liberal media. That's just a diversion by the right-wingers.

And, yes, Drudge has a definite pro-Bush bias.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: FallenHero96
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: TravisT
How accurate is Drudgereport.com? I would be so happy if this was true.

A total crapshoot on breaking news like this.

Also, remember, Drudge is rather pro-Bush.



Drudge is pro-bush? You mean Drudge isnt part of the elite liberal media, i think thats what you meant. Anyways, drudge is quoting another source. White house has denied they captured him, and drudge has also reported that.
No, there is no elite, liberal media. That's just a diversion by the right-wingers.

And, yes, Drudge has a definite pro-Bush bias.


Not even close. There was such a Bush bashing bias by the likes of CBS and others it was sickening.
 
It would be great if this were true, but I'll save the celibratory dance until I get confirmation from BBC, Reuters, etc.


Cut his head off? Nah, that would be too good for him. I say we film him being raped by pigs, shower him in pig blood, and then let his sorry ass rot in a cell for the rest of his miserable life. Broadcast it and in Arabic tell the audience this is what happens when you kill innocents and come after US troops - no paradise and virgins for you!
 
Originally posted by: kage69
It would be great if this were true, but I'll save the celibratory dance until I get confirmation from BBC, Reuters, etc.


Cut his head off? Nah, that would be too good for him. I say we film him being raped by pigs, shower him in pig blood, and then let his sorry ass rot in a cell for the rest of his miserable life. Broadcast it and in Arabic tell the audience this is what happens when you kill innocents and come after US troops - no paradise and virgins for you!

No can do with the bolded items. Considered cruel and unusual punishment.

/sarcasm off

 
Fallenhero, do us all a favor and go post on another forum....I'm tired of debating the "elite liberal media" garbage with people like you.

Did 60 minutes run a piece, relying on what appears to be forged documents? Yes? Was the content of the story likely accurate? Yes. Was there plenty of bad news coming out of Iraq to report? Yes.

Overall there is a pretty even balance in the media - if there wasn't then one side would win every election. Period. End of discussion.
 
Originally posted by: NeoV
Fallenhero, do us all a favor and go post on another forum....I'm tired of debating the "elite liberal media" garbage with people like you.

Did 60 minutes run a piece, relying on what appears to be forged documents? Yes. Was the content of the story likely accurate? No. Did it cost Dan Rather, liberal champion of CBS, his job? Yes. Was there plenty of bad news coming out of Iraq to report? Yes. Does the liberal biased media fixate on those bad news stories only? Yes.

Overall there is a pretty even balance in the media - if there wasn't then one side would win every election. Period. End of discussion.

Corrected.

Period.

End of discussion.
 
Originally posted by: FallenHero96
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: FallenHero96
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: TravisT
How accurate is Drudgereport.com? I would be so happy if this was true.

A total crapshoot on breaking news like this.

Also, remember, Drudge is rather pro-Bush.
Drudge is pro-bush? You mean Drudge isnt part of the elite liberal media, i think thats what you meant. Anyways, drudge is quoting another source. White house has denied they captured him, and drudge has also reported that.
No, there is no elite, liberal media. That's just a diversion by the right-wingers.

And, yes, Drudge has a definite pro-Bush bias.
Not even close. There was such a Bush bashing bias by the likes of CBS and others it was sickening.
Maybe by Dan Rather alone but NBC, ABC, MSNBC, CNN, and FOX were all rather pro-Bush during the election. Kerry couldn't catch a break.

Alan Keyes actually insulted the Cheneys and denigrated their daughter at the frickin' RNC! Was anything said? No. Kerry makes one mention of Cheney's daughter being gay and he gets raked across the coals for days on every channel.

Liberal bias? My Aunt Fanny.
 
NeoV, why would you want me to leave? I dont agree with you, yet im not refusing to hear the garbage you put forth.

First off, they didnt appear to be forged, they were forged. The content of the story was not likely accurate, the person who supposedly wrote them is dead. You would have to ask him how he felt.

Second, yes there was alot of bad info coming out of Iraq. But, there was also alot of GOOD information coming out of Iraq, but you wouldnt know that cause the media ignored it, and decided to run pictures of Abu Ghraib all over the place.

Speaking of that, how many days did we hear all about that Abu Ghraib crap plastered all over the news, and the guys getting caught in Iraq and getting their heads cut off (reasons like that is why we are there in the first place), were second page stuff.
 
Originally posted by: FallenHero96
NeoV, why would you want me to leave? I dont agree with you, yet im not refusing to hear the garbage you put forth.

First off, they didnt appear to be forged, they were forged. The content of the story was not likely accurate, the person who supposedly wrote them is dead. You would have to ask him how he felt.

Second, yes there was alot of bad info coming out of Iraq. But, there was also alot of GOOD information coming out of Iraq, but you wouldnt know that cause the media ignored it, and decided to run pictures of Abu Ghraib all over the place.

Speaking of that, how many days did we hear all about that Abu Ghraib crap plastered all over the news, and the guys getting caught in Iraq and getting their heads cut off (reasons like that is why we are there in the first place), were second page stuff.
Abu Ghraib *crap*??

Educate yourself:
http://forums.anandtech.com/me...5083&enterthread=y
 
Back
Top