Al Qaeda In Position To Use Nuclear Weapons

fed3r2198

Member
Feb 1, 2011
42
0
0
laden.gif
 

Orignal Earl

Diamond Member
Oct 27, 2005
8,059
55
86
Now that's a cool secret lair, even Lex Luthor would be jealous.

OP- what do you want the liberals to do?
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Who's negotiating with them? And what's your alternative plan?
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,967
140
106
alQ knows the credible threat scenario is infinitely more damaging then a detonation. They know the trouble any president would have trying to convince a populous that a credible threat is at hand. Fighting in the streets and civil unrest would ensue by those that don't believe the threat and would object to the near marshal law that would be imposed.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Not to discount the threat, but these "watchdog" groups, domestic and international alike, have a rotten history of predicting these capabilities.
 

Karl Agathon

Golden Member
Sep 30, 2010
1,081
0
0
if a nuke goes off in a U.S. city, immediate and swift retaliation must be taken by nuking Mecca and Medina.
 
Last edited:

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
When you stop crying "WOLF" for the attention.

Seriously, are we going to invade yet another country with no WMD again? We've wasted resources on shit that had nothing to do with terrorism, thanks to the OP and his party.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
From what I've heard "dirty bombs" aren't that dangerous. I'm sure the US and its allies are making serious efforts to get OBL. Why? It would be good for just about anyone's career.
 

Patranus

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2007
9,280
0
0
Seriously, are we going to invade yet another country with no WMD again? We've wasted resources on shit that had nothing to do with terrorism, thanks to the OP and his party.

Did you take the time to read the article?
 

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Qaida+brink+using+nuclear+bomb/4205104/story.html

When will the liberals realize that they will not stop until America and its allies are destroyed.

There is no negotiating with these people.

Um, can you point me to the article about how we're negotiating with Al Qaida? And can you give your point by point analysis of how liberals are so ineffective at dealing with nuclear terrorism but conservatives are so much more effective? Give us specific examples.

Or is your sole point that liberal don't torture enough people?
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
In one incident in September 2009, two employees at the Rossing Uranium Mine in Namibia smuggled almost half a ton of uranium concentrate powder - yellowcake - out of the compound in plastic bags.
How the fuck do you smuggle out 1000 lbs of yellowcake in plastic bags without getting noticed?
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
When will the liberals realize that they will not stop until America and its allies are destroyed.

There is no negotiating with these people.

Those darn liberals, disrupting the anti-proliferation efforts by exposing Valerie Plame, refusing to ratify the START treaty renewal for over a year for the worst sort of politics, pursuing an immoral and selfish set of policies that cause the creation of widespread enemies and anger aimed at the US and support for those who oppose the US...

If only Obama hadn't made his only policy to negotiate with Osama not to nuke the US. The Republicans are SO much better, the way they ignored all the Al Queda warnings...
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
It's not 'proven', but there are many suggestions from evidence and leaks that the Bush administration explicitly called off the imminent capture of Osama bin Laden at Tora Bora because is he were captured or killed, it would deflate the agenda they were using him for such as the invasion of Iraq. It also then helps explain Bush's bizarre shift from a very concentrated, massive hunt for bin Laden to saying that he didn't care much if bin Laden were caught, and gave him little thought.

Can't hang the war agenda on the capture of one guy that might happen - need an endless 'war on terror' to feed the machine and propaganda need to justify war.
 

PeshakJang

Platinum Member
Mar 17, 2010
2,276
0
0
It's not 'proven', but there are many suggestions from evidence and leaks that the Bush administration explicitly called off the imminent capture of Osama bin Laden at Tora Bora because is he were captured or killed, it would deflate the agenda they were using him for such as the invasion of Iraq.

It's not "proven", but there are many suggestions from evidence and statements that the Obama administration has purposely undermined border security efforts and pushed back-door amnesty because if the illegal immigrant problem were solved, it would deflate the agenda of building a poor, dependent-class voting block to ensure Democrat voter turnout for generations.

Only difference between my statement and yours is that mine is actually believable.