Al Gore and UN council win Nobel Peace Prize?

[davestar]

Originally posted by: Delita
I think you are entirely wrong on this issue...in business constant change is a requirement. If you don't change then you are going to be left behind. However, getting the government to change...now that is scary.

Right. The RIAA is a shining example of how much businesses love change.

 

[Slick5150]

Originally posted by: davestar

Originally posted by: Delita
I think you are entirely wrong on this issue...in business constant change is a requirement. If you don't change then you are going to be left behind. However, getting the government to change...now that is scary.

Right. The RIAA is a shining example of how much businesses love change.

Bingo.. And in this case, the US auto makers falling so far behind in developing fuel efficient and alternative energy cars, because it was easier to keep making SUVs and hoping people would buy them. Or utility companies that argue technology doesn't exist to reduce CO2 emissions from coal plants when its already being used in many areas and proven to work.

The US use to thrive on the cutting edge. Now, we just play catchup on so many things because we lack the will to better.

 

[Fritzo]

Originally posted by: Captain Howdy
This thread had potential:

Originally posted by: Chryso
I have ridden the mighty Moon Worm!

But P&N mode is initialized after the next post:

Originally posted by: Fritzo
Actually, that's it. It's turning out he was right about nearly every major issue in the last decade, and people are starting to say "Hey....exactly why isn't this guy president???" Considering the other candidates, I think he was the right choice.

I meant candidates for the Noble Prize, not for president. Stop trying to start stuff

 

[FoBoT]

Originally posted by: Queasy
Nobel Prize lost all meaning when they gave it to Arafat anyways.

P&N please.

^^^ :thumbsup: ^^^