Originally posted by: Kilgor
Why not if they're nonlethal. Every time a hippy get his bell rung an angel gets their wing's.![]()
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
How about starting with death row inmates?
Originally posted by: SophalotJack
Originally posted by: Kilgor
Why not if they're nonlethal. Every time a hippy get his bell rung an angel gets their wing's.![]()
Actually, everytime a hippie gets his clocked clean, my next fwapping session is intense and memorable.
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
A good question that was posed on Slashdot: Why would the military be involved in domestic law enforcement? Also, how about we test these nonlethal weapons on the people who are in charge of developing them? I'd suggest Dick Cheney, myself...
Originally posted by: DurocShark
Originally posted by: SophalotJack
Originally posted by: Kilgor
Why not if they're nonlethal. Every time a hippy get his bell rung an angel gets their wing's.![]()
Actually, everytime a hippie gets his clocked clean, my next fwapping session is intense and memorable.
So you think about hippies when fwapping?!?!?!
Originally posted by: Heisenberg
Hmm...I thought it was illegal for the military to act as a law enforcement against US citizens unless martial law has been declared. I'm really not a big fan of this idea.
Well, he's got a point, even if it flies in the face of the Bush adminstration's stance on the matter"If we're not willing to use it here against our fellow citizens, then we should not be willing to use it in a wartime situation," said Wynne.
Originally posted by: jagec
Well, he's got a point, even if it flies in the face of the Bush adminstration's stance on the matter"If we're not willing to use it here against our fellow citizens, then we should not be willing to use it in a wartime situation," said Wynne.![]()
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Originally posted by: jagec
Well, he's got a point, even if it flies in the face of the Bush adminstration's stance on the matter"If we're not willing to use it here against our fellow citizens, then we should not be willing to use it in a wartime situation," said Wynne.![]()
Well....I did a google search, and I certainly couldn't find the last time the U.S. government used their "MOAB " on our citizens here, nor cluster bombs, or daisy-cutters, or napalm............so, IMO, that argument doesn't cut it...
Originally posted by: thehstrybean
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Originally posted by: jagec
Well, he's got a point, even if it flies in the face of the Bush adminstration's stance on the matter"If we're not willing to use it here against our fellow citizens, then we should not be willing to use it in a wartime situation," said Wynne.![]()
Well....I did a google search, and I certainly couldn't find the last time the U.S. government used their "MOAB " on our citizens here, nor cluster bombs, or daisy-cutters, or napalm............so, IMO, that argument doesn't cut it...
Daisy-cutters on a PETA protest...
Originally posted by: Number1
Secretary Michael Wynne is a cicvilian. He should be the first one on the tester list.
:disgust:
