Air cooling for Rampage IV Gene (x79 - 3930k)

dmoney1980

Platinum Member
Jan 17, 2008
2,471
38
91
Hello ATOT,

I'm looking for an air alternative to the AIO water solutions out there for a Rampage IV Gene. CPU will be a 3930k, and a light OC will be attempted. Primary use will be gaming.

My main concern is GPU and RAM clearance around the socket and PCIE slots. Coolers like the Noctua D14 are not an option unfortunately, so I ask the ATOT world for their guidance.

Thanks!

Motherboard in question: http://www.asus.com/us/Motherboards/RAMPAGE_IV_GENE/
 
Last edited:

dmoney1980

Platinum Member
Jan 17, 2008
2,471
38
91
I thought the Maximus IV Gene was socket 1155 and the 3930K was socket 2011.

http://www.asus.com/US/Motherboards/MAXIMUS_IV_GENEZGEN3/

No?

Are you rejecting Noctuas generally or only the D14 because of RAM clearance or socket compatibility issues?

Good catch! I meant Rampage 4 Gene (fixed it now)....yeah I like Noctua but the d14 is out due to its size / clearance issue. I'm wondering if a 212 Evo will do the trick....can't beat it for the price, but I hate their mounting system!
 

ignatzatsonic

Senior member
Nov 20, 2006
351
0
0
In the Noctua line, look at U14S and U12S.

Both are single tower and designed to not overhang RAM slots.

Noctua has a compatibility page for every cooler.

For the U14S and the Rampage 4 Gene it says: "In vertical orientation, the cooler is extending over the first PCI-E x16 slot, so please use the other available PCI-E slot(s) for your video card(s) or turn the cooler by 90°."

For the U12S and the Rampage 4 Gene, it says no compatibility issues at all. I've got one of these myself. Quieter than the 212 EVO and a few degrees cooler; excellent mounting system; includes a low noise adapter and a tube of their good thermal paste.

http://www.relaxedtech.com/reviews/noctua/nh-u12s/1

Confirm they don't have height clearance issues for your case.

They have also recently introduced the D15S, which is a modified version of the D15, designed to have fewer compatibility issues. It also shows as no compatibility issues with the Rampage 4 Gene. But it's a dual tower and overkill for anyone interested in only mild to moderate overclocking unless you are the type who thinks that 48 degrees is necessarily "better" than 51 in a given situation.

Scythe Kotetsu is another excellent one, but I don't know about compatibility with your motherboard or clearance issues.

http://www.silentpcreview.com/Scythe_Kotetsu
 
Last edited:

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
16,110
1,722
126
EVGA ACX 100-FS-C201-KR is another option. No bigger than the Noctua single-tower options, it may fall within the size range between those and the 212 EVO.

At something between 120W and 130W thermal power under load, it will perform 6C degrees better than the D14, properly installed. My own comparison measurements against my own D14 shows ~5C cooler at between 134 and 137W.

Since you're starting at 130W TDP for the stock i7-3930K, the differences among these coolers shrink under an overclock yielding greater thermal wattage than that.

The drawbacks of the ACX are its "euro-cut" styling -- making it impossible to mount two fans (but you can have "two fans" if it's ported to the rear exhaust fan with a TR blue-rubber accordion duct (~$5) or any of your own design and making. Also, the blingy-red-LED fan is just a tad noisier than I'd want: I replaced mine with a Noctua iPPC 3000 120mm. If you're not easy with motherboard PWM thermal fan-control, the iPPC 2000 should be satisfactory. Or you could buy an Akasa Viper (with yucky black and puke-yellow colors) for less -- same airflow, ~ same dBA range.

It may be the case you already acquired the i7-3930K as a lucky opportunity. Such items are hard to find brand-new in Intel shrink-wrap. If you haven't already acquired the processor, I would recommend an Ivy Bridge E processor instead -- perhaps the i7-4930K. The combination of that IB-E with the X79 chipset would give you more options, such as a bCLK with a strap.
 

dmoney1980

Platinum Member
Jan 17, 2008
2,471
38
91
Thanks everyone! I decided to get a CM Nepton 120xl from a seller here slightly used, got it for a decent price. I read reviews and it seemed like a good performer, plus the AIO eliminates guesswork with regards to RAM and PCIE clearance.

I do think that most mATX motherboards with high wattage or overclocked CPU's would require AIO cooling, since HSF tower specs could be limited due to clearance.
 

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
16,110
1,722
126
Thanks everyone! I decided to get a CM Nepton 120xl from a seller here slightly used, got it for a decent price. I read reviews and it seemed like a good performer, plus the AIO eliminates guesswork with regards to RAM and PCIE clearance.

I do think that most mATX motherboards with high wattage or overclocked CPU's would require AIO cooling, since HSF tower specs could be limited due to clearance.

I agree. I wouldn't say they "require" it, but I'd lean that way for an E processor of any generation -- SB, IB -- Haswell.

The Nepton product line had been successful enough to draw my attention to it. I just hope a single-fan AiO will float your boat.
 

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
16,110
1,722
126
Thanks everyone! I decided to get a CM Nepton 120xl from a seller here slightly used, got it for a decent price. I read reviews and it seemed like a good performer, plus the AIO eliminates guesswork with regards to RAM and PCIE clearance.

I do think that most mATX motherboards with high wattage or overclocked CPU's would require AIO cooling, since HSF tower specs could be limited due to clearance.

I'd say one should lean toward AiO or custom-water for the E processors. And I hope the Nepton 120XL floats your boat for you.

But I've checked a couple comparison review sources, and I feel compelled to say that a cooler like the NH-D15 beats it hands down for a common, selected, overclocked thermal wattage load. So applying the "transitivity axiom" in logic and predicate calculus -- "If A<B AND B<C THEN A<C" -- my EVGA ACX cooler beats the 120XL by about 3C more than the D15.

The NH-D15 also beats out the Nepton 240M. It is possible you can "do some things" to reduce the gap of the 120XL. But you have to be willing to suffer a day's tedium to get them done.

I'd still go with an AiO or custom-water for that processor. But if I were to do it for a Haswell-E chip, I'll want a dual-fan radiator in the bargain. That's my particular problem: If I want a particular cooler, I may either have to mod a case I have at hand, or buy a new one. Decisions, decisions!
 

dmoney1980

Platinum Member
Jan 17, 2008
2,471
38
91
I'm with you Banzai- the D15 is a beast but ultimately the motherboard being mATX limited my choices.
 

PhIlLy ChEeSe

Senior member
Apr 1, 2013
962
0
0
Yeah you need a massive cooler to cool a Sandybridge E CPU, like no case on the bench stuff. As Duck said the ideal way to go is custom water cooling for best temps, the Rampage 4 will auto over clock up to 4.5(keep an eye on the auto CPU voltage) also the PLL voltage. Think it defaults to 8.0 lowering it will help other temps, also you'll need a good fan on the Vregs as they tend to run hot.
 

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
16,110
1,722
126
Yeah you need a massive cooler to cool a Sandybridge E CPU, like no case on the bench stuff. As Duck said the ideal way to go is custom water cooling for best temps, the Rampage 4 will auto over clock up to 4.5(keep an eye on the auto CPU voltage) also the PLL voltage. Think it defaults to 8.0 lowering it will help other temps, also you'll need a good fan on the Vregs as they tend to run hot.

You know . . . and I know . . . that you made some sort of typo for the PLL Voltage specs. I just wouldn't want the OP to be misled by the mistake.

So for the OP -- The usual default or "auto" value for PLL Voltage is 1.8V.

For some motherboards, you can lower it to maybe 1.6V, but the "sweet spot" seems to be 1.68 to 1.70V -- probably for your most comfortable overclock settings. At some point and for some boards, folks had to bump it up higher than 1.8. But finding the low value will also help keep temperatures down. I had come across a Sandy Bridge E OC Guide that was very professionally written, and thought it might have insight to PLL Voltage, but I couldn't locate it after a half-hour's search while writing this post.
 

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
16,110
1,722
126
I'm with you Banzai- the D15 is a beast but ultimately the motherboard being mATX limited my choices.

Just my thought about this.

I think only your choice of a case would preempt using a double-tower cooler like the D15 with an mATX board. There's less PCB to warp. But with the Noctua towers, the weight is concentrated in the base, and the base puts little or no torque on the board. Therefore, the torque people worry about with these coolers derives from fan-weight: about 7 oz. each for either 120 or 140mm fans.

As I may have said, the EVGA ACX cooler will keep temperatures ~ 2C to 3C lower than the D15 for thermal wattage at or below that of the SB-E processor. The differences between coolers narrow as the thermal wattage increases -- for instance, from overclocking.
 

PhIlLy ChEeSe

Senior member
Apr 1, 2013
962
0
0
You know . . . and I know . . . that you made some sort of typo for the PLL Voltage specs. I just wouldn't want the OP to be misled by the mistake.

So for the OP -- The usual default or "auto" value for PLL Voltage is 1.8V.

For some motherboards, you can lower it to maybe 1.6V, but the "sweet spot" seems to be 1.68 to 1.70V -- probably for your most comfortable overclock settings. At some point and for some boards, folks had to bump it up higher than 1.8. But finding the low value will also help keep temperatures down. I had come across a Sandy Bridge E OC Guide that was very professionally written, and thought it might have insight to PLL Voltage, but I couldn't locate it after a half-hour's search while writing this post.


Opps

Yeah sorry to damn tired all the time. OK so to be clear on mine it is CPU PLL and if I lower mine from 1.75 to 1.65 @ a 4600 it BSODS. I'm pretty sure there is a big write up on this subject and I just spent 2 hours looking, think i was looking in the wrong place though.
 
Last edited:

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
16,110
1,722
126
Opps

Yeah sorry to damn tired all the time. OK so to be clear on mine it is CPU PLL and if I lower mine from 1.75 to 1.65 @ a 4600 it BSODS. I'm pretty sure there is a big write up on this subject and I just spent 2 hours looking, think i was looking in the wrong place though.

I encountered an ROG OC'ing guide some weeks ago (and sorry -- can't spend all day looking for it again): there was a diagnostic process of balancing VCCIO/VTT/etc. against PLL Voltage which -- with GURR-EAT patience! -- would lead you to the choice of voltages for mitigating a Stop-Code 124 BSOD.

Also, I think we discussed this before. I'd been plumbing PLL Voltage settings around 1.65V, but the "sweet-spot" (at least for my CPU and mobo) was between 1.68 and 1.70V.

Lately I'd discovered that I'd been volting the VCCIO (IMC) too much, even for keeping it below about 1.135V or 0.065V below the accepted/recommended limit. I've now got it down to around 1.075V and I think it can go lower. The "Auto" settings for my system with the stock profile reveals a VCCIO of around 1.035V in the BIOS monitor. Of course, that's so close -- so close -- and I'm running RAM at CR=1. I could almost ask "Why bother?"

[If you lived in California, you could get your medical cannabis "permit" card for a sleep disorder. :biggrin::biggrin:]
 

PhIlLy ChEeSe

Senior member
Apr 1, 2013
962
0
0
I encountered an ROG OC'ing guide some weeks ago (and sorry -- can't spend all day looking for it again): there was a diagnostic process of balancing VCCIO/VTT/etc. against PLL Voltage which -- with GURR-EAT patience! -- would lead you to the choice of voltages for mitigating a Stop-Code 124 BSOD.

Also, I think we discussed this before. I'd been plumbing PLL Voltage settings around 1.65V, but the "sweet-spot" (at least for my CPU and mobo) was between 1.68 and 1.70V.

Lately I'd discovered that I'd been volting the VCCIO (IMC) too much, even for keeping it below about 1.135V or 0.065V below the accepted/recommended limit. I've now got it down to around 1.075V and I think it can go lower. The "Auto" settings for my system with the stock profile reveals a VCCIO of around 1.035V in the BIOS monitor. Of course, that's so close -- so close -- and I'm running RAM at CR=1. I could almost ask "Why bother?"

[If you lived in California, you could get your medical cannabis "permit" card for a sleep disorder. :biggrin::biggrin:]

Yup spot on,
and if your over clocking the die is on the chip so less memory higher over clocks. Most good overclocks use one stick of memory(or very small sticks like 1 gig), just seen one I liked it a lot!
Cheers Duck!
 

dmoney1980

Platinum Member
Jan 17, 2008
2,471
38
91
Great exchange guys, I appreciate the insight. What would you recommend as a good starting point for overclocking guides? I did some searching myself and found plenty of guides for the 3930k. Ideally I'd like to stay under 1.375 on the vCore (if possible) using offset voltage, but was also wondering what kind of c-states / LLC settings to use. I'm not looking to break any OC records, but a 4.3-4.5 ghz clock would make me happy!

Guides and threads found so far:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1189242/...anations-and-support-for-all-x79-overclockers

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2323747

http://rog.asus.com/forum/showthread.php?17627-Rampage-IV-Extreme-3930k-Overclocking-help
 

PhIlLy ChEeSe

Senior member
Apr 1, 2013
962
0
0
The ROG forums are good, you might also find the how to flash tread in there as if you find a "00" in the read out you'll need to flash the bios(You have dual bios).
Only limiting factor is the room temps and your cooler, mine did over 5ghz under custom water cooling. Remember you have a 6/12 core CPU, temps are the biggest issue and cooling them is no small task. This time of year, I don't even turn mine on......
The board will auto volt the CPU up to 4.5Ghz, then you can re boot and lower the voltage a bit and do stress testing. If the cooler is good just change the multi in the bios, leave all energy states on(saves temps) n boot. Use realtemp to monitor the CPU, also a good fan on the Vregs is a MUST!
http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/SysInfo/Real_Temp/
 

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,731
3,440
136
Great exchange guys, I appreciate the insight. What would you recommend as a good starting point for overclocking guides? I did some searching myself and found plenty of guides for the 3930k. Ideally I'd like to stay under 1.375 on the vCore (if possible) using offset voltage, but was also wondering what kind of c-states / LLC settings to use. I'm not looking to break any OC records, but a 4.3-4.5 ghz clock would make me happy!

Guides and threads found so far:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1189242/...anations-and-support-for-all-x79-overclockers

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2323747

http://rog.asus.com/forum/showthread.php?17627-Rampage-IV-Extreme-3930k-Overclocking-help


I ran my chip at 4.3 for the longest time. All I did was...change the multiplier. That's it. Auto voltage worked great and didn't go over about 1.28. All motherboard power settings like LLC and all that stuff was put on lowest setting, such as normal, standard, off and one of them was optimized since the only other alternative was like Volcano heat extreme or something. CPU was rock stable.
Now its at 4.6. Only change is a bump to the offset Vcore. .035 I believe is what I have now and its been stable. Motherboard power stuff is still turned off and no tweaking was needed. 4 stick of ram, no problems.
Also, something I find odd is that I couldn't get 4.5ghz stable at this voltage. I had to go to 4.6 and it was easy. Weird.
 
Last edited:

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
16,110
1,722
126
Great exchange guys, I appreciate the insight. What would you recommend as a good starting point for overclocking guides? I did some searching myself and found plenty of guides for the 3930k. Ideally I'd like to stay under 1.375 on the vCore (if possible) using offset voltage, but was also wondering what kind of c-states / LLC settings to use. I'm not looking to break any OC records, but a 4.3-4.5 ghz clock would make me happy!

Guides and threads found so far:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1189242/...anations-and-support-for-all-x79-overclockers

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2323747

http://rog.asus.com/forum/showthread.php?17627-Rampage-IV-Extreme-3930k-Overclocking-help

I was drawn to your response and your questions.

The OC guide for Sandy E which I found a couple weeks ago -- I haven't been able to relocated with any certainty. You might try Benchmark Reviews or "Benchmark HQ". Oddly, I remember certain things from what seemed to be a very professional and detailed guide.

Since I only have the Sandy K processors, I still found the E guides extremely relevant and more so for X79 boards by the manufacturer of my Z68's -- ASUS. In other words, I can gather wisdom from a lot of guides:

1st priority: Guides which focus on your particular processor and your particular motherboard
2nd priority (not to be excluded): Guides which focus on other motherboards with the same chipset and your processor
3rd priority and not to be excluded: Guides for successor chipsets, possibly same board maker, and later processors for the same socket and successor chipsets. For instance and for me, I've consulted guides meant both for SB and IB K chips and Z77 chipsets.

Immediately, in answer to your post and based on experiences I'd had over the last year, I will tell you to turn off or disable the C3/C6 Report items in the BIOS, but leave the EIST and C1E enabled. I had been plagued by IDLE instability which occurred over 10-day to 30-day intervals, making it very hard to replicate and troubleshoot. After enough "research" of "guides" and causes for BSOD stop-code 124, it is now absolutely clear to me that C3/C6 Enabled is the major culprit for these occasional idle crashes.

What is the drawback for turning them off? Either nothing or next to nothing. Turning them off makes it difficult or impossible to use certain sleep states related only "Hybrid Sleep" settings in Windows. Also, disabling them may result in a slight increase in power consumption in the order of perhaps a couple watts at idle. But if the computer and its overclock have been thoroughly tested for stability, you can still put the computer to sleep and wake it; you can still allow it to hibernate and wake from hibernation.

On the positive side, turning off C3/C6 stabilizes idle voltage. The unfortunate interaction between LLC and VCORE Offset voltage can cause voltage fluctuation in the idle state, when the processor is showing close to or below 1.0V under the EIST/C1E Enabled setting. If it drops too low at one point in time or another, it will generate the 124 BSOD. So you will suddenly notice the disappearance of voltage fluctuation between 0.8 and 1.0, with a stable voltage much closer to 0.98 to 1.0+.

On the matter of LLC, the SB-E guide recommended what I'd gleaned independently from working with my 2600K and 2700K: Do not exceed an LLC setting of "High" (for an ASUS board Z68 or X79). On my boards, the selections are "Auto" (none?), "Regular," "Medium", "High", "Ultra High" and "Extreme." The High setting still allows a vDroop in loaded voltage, which under the more severe stress-tests might be approximately 30 mV. You do not want to eliminate vDroop altogether. Droop is good.

Since you have the Rampage IV board (ASUS), I'd bet that all of these suggestions apply well to your system.

The other recommendations I saw in the SB-E guide were similar to what I might find in an SB-K guide.

Avoid using the "Extreme" duty-cycle and phase-power settings if you can, or unless you've made special attention to cooling VRMs on the motherboard. If you have to, I'd personally found that the duty cycle can be set to "Asus Optimized" which I think is default, while the phase-power setting needed to be set to "Extreme" for balancing current in the VRMs as opposed to temperature balance.

Also, the matter of PLL Overvoltage, which is not the same as PLL Voltage. Avoid using it -- that is, leave it disabled -- unless you're trying for clock settings of 4.7 Ghz or higher. A myth about PLL Overvoltage had been promulgated in Sandy Bridge guides telling users to enabled it beginning with clocks of 4.5. Better off if you can manage your best overclock without it. And the E guide discouraged its use for 24/7 settings, just as it discouraged using "Extreme" on both the duty cycle and phase-power settings.

Also, another myth has been dispelled: It was common practice to disable Spread Spectrum -- a practice going back to Pentium 4 days. You might try disabling it while tuning your system for your clock target and verifying stability. But in the end -- enable it, perhaps do another stability test run to see if other tweaks are needed. But it will also stabilize voltage at both idle and load if enabled.

As for what guides to read specifically, I don't have specific links for you. Just keep searching, and get an idea about which guides are written by people who know what they're doing.

And also, I think you are spot-on for choosing a self-imposed voltage target of 1.375V. That's what I've chosen to do -- more or less.

The only thing to split hairs about with that: there is some consensus that the "safe limit" applies to the extremely loaded, drooped voltage of severe stress-tests. In my case, if the unloaded turbo-speed shows a voltage at just above 1.38, this loaded value would be ~ 1.35V. For that, I think I could still go higher to bring that loaded value up to (perhaps) 1.37. But this is all a matter of choice, desired clock settings, temperatures, etc. If you can achieve your clock target with less voltage after tuning it for consistent GFLOPS in certain tests, why push it higher?

Now with all that, I'm still thinking of bumping up my 2700K to 4.8 Ghz, because it won't much push the temperatures into an uncomfortable range. But I might see unloaded turbo voltage show up in the HWMonitor "Maximum" column at 1.40+. I'll think about it some more, while I continue to enjoy my gaming at 4.7.

Oh. ONe more thing I remember from that guide for SB-E overclocking. Set your "current capability" at 120% and no higher than that. Let me emphasize -- no higher than 120%.
 
Last edited: