Aiding and abetting the enemy - Time Magazine

[GrGr]

I fail to see how the "loss" of Cheney from the chain of command would in any way weaken US capabilites. I would suggest quite the opposite. In this case it would be addition by substraction. However the Law might view it otherwise.

 

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: GrGr
I fail to see how the "loss" of Cheney from the chain of command would in any way weaken US capabilites. I would suggest quite the opposite. In this case it would be addition by substraction. However the Law might view it otherwise.

Simple logic. Losing Cheney would be bad for Halliburton. What's good for Halliburton is good for America. Therefore, losing Cheney is bad for America.

Right?

 

[heartsurgeon]

I fail to see how the "loss" of Cheney from the chain of command would in any way weaken US capabilites. I would suggest quite the opposite. In this case it would be addition by substraction. However the Law might view it otherwise.

only a high school student would make light of the assasination of a high ranking goverment official. This is offensive and utterly juvenile.

 

[GrGr]

Originally posted by: heartsurgeon

I fail to see how the "loss" of Cheney from the chain of command would in any way weaken US capabilites. I would suggest quite the opposite. In this case it would be addition by substraction. However the Law might view it otherwise.

only a high school student would make light of the assasination of a high ranking goverment official. This is offensive and utterly juvenile.

Yes it was I apologize. Even if I do not hold Cheney in high regard he is still a human being. I thought of the statement when I wrote it as political rhetoric rahter than a serious suggestion and I hope you can see it as such.

Edit: Bowfinger saw it in the light intended. Thank you.

 

[tallest1]

Wouldn't it be horribly ironic if the Time magazine article in question were removed from publication at the last minute? That would make DrudgeReport guilty of revealing confidential information publicly

 

[abaez]

Originally posted by: NeoV
ah yes, aiding and abetting the enemy - you mean like disclosing the name of a CIA operative whose husband was ciritcal of the current administration?

 

[PrinceofWands]

You all know how against censorship and government classification I am, and even I KNOW that this is WAY out of line. Unless it's a ruse, in which case it's rather obvious, but it's worth a shot.