Aida32 vs Sandra?

[dbwillis]

XMS3200LL @ 2-2-2-6-1T / 2.6v
2.4B @ 172fsb / 1.575v
Asus P4G8X -Deluxe


With Aida32 v 3.20:>
-----write - 1157
-----read - 0 ---WTF?

With Aida32 v3.40:>
---write - 1157
---read - 4336

 

[Jgtdragon]

I am using Version 3.4.

 

[Tetsuo]

Corsair XMS2700 2x256mb @ 2.5v
Iwill P4HT
mhz = 2533
fsb = 115
mem = 296
cas = 2336 1T >
read = 2246 >
write = 813 [/quote]


sucky results....

 

[THUGSROOK]

Originally posted by: Jgtdragon
I am using Version 3.4.

yea, v3.4

 

[OverVolt]

Giga-Byte AMD761
Sammy 2x 256 Cas2 stock volt 140mhz (280DDR)



Read 1647 (don't laugh plz)
Write 567 (again ^)

 

[poMONKey]

Originally posted by: MrMajestyk

Apologies, yep 2.6/2.7/2.9.

Wondered how he gets 2.5v ? Is it a voltage mod ?

isnt 2.5v default? you wouldnt see it...

 

[DAPUNISHER]

P4PE/L
Apacer 3200DDR CL3 1-512mb stick@DDR418 2.5-3-3-6@2.6v
167fsb
CPU-3.006ghz (Increase in ambient temp forced reduction in overclock, imagine that )

read-3050
write-1095

 

[DAPUNISHER]

Soltek SL-75FRN-L Nforce2
Apacer 3200DDR CL3-3-3-7 2x512mb@DDR422@2.5v
FSB-211mhz
CPU-2.33ghz

read-3167
write-1254 :Q

 

[SupermanCK]

Originally posted by: poMONKey

Originally posted by: MrMajestyk

Apologies, yep 2.6/2.7/2.9.

Wondered how he gets 2.5v ? Is it a voltage mod ?

isnt 2.5v default? you wouldnt see it...

YALL are so funny...it just a mistake on my part from copying and pasting thugs format and forgot to change the 2.5v...so it should be 2.6v...my bad...LOL

 

[Tetsuo]

Originally posted by: tetuyeda
Corsair XMS2700 2x256mb @ 2.5v Iwill P4HT mhz = 2533 fsb = 115 mem = 296 cas = 2336 1T > read = 2246 > write = 813

sucky results....[/quote]

bleh....

mhz=2600
mem=302
cas =2225

read = 2375 >
write = 782

 

[Paveslave]

I don't know if I ran the test right, I just clicked on memory read/write and it gave me some numbers.

Mem Read: 3497 mb/s
Mem Write: 809 mb/s

 

[Megatomic]

That's all you have to do.

 

[Tetsuo]

Originally posted by: tetuyeda

Originally posted by: tetuyeda Corsair XMS2700 2x256mb @ 2.5v Iwill P4HT mhz = 2533 fsb = 115 mem = 296 cas = 2336 1T > read = 2246 > write = 813

sucky results....

bleh.... mhz=2600 mem=302 cas =2225 read = 2375 > write = 782[/quote]

different processor now...

mhz=2110
mem=328
cas =2226
read = 2581 >
write = 795

 

[shoman94]

Originally posted by: shoman94

Originally posted by: shoman94
Corsair Twin XMS3500c2pt 2x512mb @ 2.5v
AOpen AX4C-Max (Canterwood) (dcddr)

mhz = 2566
fsb = 150
mem = 375mhz dcddr
cas = 2226

> read = 3678
> write = 1753

Changed things a bit........

Corsair Twin XMS3500c2pt 2x512mb @ 2.5v
AOpen AX4C-Max (Canterwood) (dcddr)

mhz = 2740
fsb = 161
mem = 322mhz dcddr
cas = 2225

> read = 3977
> write = 1543

Changed a bit more...

Corsair Twin XMS3500c2pt 2x512mb @ 2.525v
AOpen AX4C-Max (Canterwood) (dcddr)

mhz = 2740
fsb = 161
mem = 402mhz dcddr
cas = 2.5,3,3,7

> read = 3891
> write = 1876

 

[Yourself]

2x512 mb Twinmos w/Winbond BH5 chips
Asus P4G8X-D E7205

mhz = 3293
fsb = 183
mem = 366mhz dcddr
cas = 2226 2T

> read = 4474
> write= 1161

**Edit**
Changed to 1T

> read= 4649 :Q
> write= 1161(no change)

 

[THUGSROOK]

Originally posted by: shoman94

> read = 3891
> write = 1876

holy cow! :Q

 

[Yourself]

Check above for the edit. I changed to 1T and my read went up almost 4% :Q



Self

 

[shoman94]

Originally posted by: THUGSROOK

Originally posted by: shoman94

> read = 3891
> write = 1876

holy cow! :Q

That's what I said.....I'm lovin this MOBO.....

 

[Paveslave]

So does this check the mobo or the RAM? I am confused about this test, can someone explain what exactly this is testing. I know it is testing Read/Write ablility of RAM, but is it limited to what the mobo can transfer or what? Should more or less RAM make a difference? How can I make the tranfer rates better? K, thanks for listening.

 

[bedrocked]

Corsair 2700LLPT @ 6-3-3-2 (scddr will retest when my other stick comes in with dcddr)
MSI K7N2L

mhz = 2100
fsb = 190
mem = 378
read = 2798
write = 1026


hm read seems a lil slow, due to relaxed timings?

 

[THUGSROOK]

on my system.....

"turbo" (otherwise known as 1T COMMAND) has the larger effect on read = +215mb / +3mb write
going from cas 2.5-3-3-7 to cas 2-2-2-6 has a larger effect on write = +40mb / +161mb

id say by the way the scores are showing on various platforms ~ this bench does test the entire memory subsystem.


Corsair Twin XMS3200LL 2x256mb @ 2.5v
Asus P4G8X-D e7205 (dcddr)

mhz = 3400
fsb = 179
mem = 358mhz dcddr

> BASE TEST < read / write
cas 2.5-3-3-7 2T = 4559 / 1034

> TURBO <
cas 2.5-3-3-7 1T = 4774 / 1037 (+215mb / +3mb)

> CAS2 <
cas 2-2-2-6 2T = 4599 / 1195 (+40mb / +161mb)

> BOTH <
cas 2-2-2-6 1T = 4804 / 1197 (+245mb / +163mb)

 

[Elcs]

Running TURBO memory settings on XP 1800+ on EPoX 8KHA+ with Crucial PC2100 DDR
(dunno what every little number is )

Everything else running stock.

Read - 1909 MB/s
Write - 611 MB/s

 

[Blooz1]

I was foolin' with this a little last night as I tried some different settings.

I also noticed a difference in results when I went from 2-2-2-5 at 11x200FSB to 2.5-3-3-6 at 11x205FSB. Both scores dropped, even though the clock speed was higher. I tried a couple of other settings with similar results.

I agree with Thugsrook that it does test the entire memory sub-system, and it seems that clock speed is not a great factor from what I've seen in my tests. That seem like a good thing to me for a memory bench.

 

[Jgtdragon]

This test appears to test more on your chipset then the actual memory sticks. Most of the dual channel performed better than signle channel chipset. My crappy Samsungs are hanging in there with the corairs?

 

[Tetsuo]

Also, the higher your FSB, the higher your mem. scores. At least from what I've noticed