Originally posted by: pulse8
That's great.
I agree, 2000 is better than nothing. But XP is the best.Originally posted by: Nitemare
2000 >
Originally posted by: cashman
Originally posted by: Radiohead
Word
No it is just the fact that XP Home sucks.Originally posted by: RossMAN
I like the extras XP has but it feels bloated and slow compared to basic Windows 2000.
Maybe it's because I haven't defragged for over a year on our laptop and we're using XP Home.
Is there any difference if I defrag first, then re-format and do a clean install? Should I skip the defrag first?
Originally posted by: werk
I agree, 2000 is better than nothing. But XP is the best.Originally posted by: Nitemare
2000 >
Originally posted by: RossMAN
I like the extras XP has but it feels bloated and slow compared to basic Windows 2000.
Maybe it's because I haven't defragged for over a year on our laptop and we're using XP Home.
Is there any difference if I defrag first, then re-format and do a clean install? Should I skip the defrag first?
Originally posted by: minendo
No it is just the fact that XP Home sucks.Originally posted by: RossMAN
I like the extras XP has but it feels bloated and slow compared to basic Windows 2000.
Maybe it's because I haven't defragged for over a year on our laptop and we're using XP Home.
Is there any difference if I defrag first, then re-format and do a clean install? Should I skip the defrag first?
Originally posted by: rpbri2886
Originally posted by: RossMAN
Originally posted by: minendo
No it is just the fact that XP Home sucks.Originally posted by: RossMAN
I like the extras XP has but it feels bloated and slow compared to basic Windows 2000.
Maybe it's because I haven't defragged for over a year on our laptop and we're using XP Home.
Is there any difference if I defrag first, then re-format and do a clean install? Should I skip the defrag first?
I only have 1 license for Win XP Pro which I'm using on my desktop![]()
cough cough bluelist keygen cough cough
thats just what i hear anyway