only worth it if they change how they review ram to a method that actually shows the benefits and compares cpu performance against ram performance
for example 4460 with 1600c7 ram vs 4690 with 1600c11 ram may perform much the same
or 2500k @4.5ghz with 2133c9 ram can compete with 4690k @4.5ghz with 1600c11
and then there is the performance difference between single and double sided sticks
with the way that they test ram at the moment with a high end cpu a mid end gpu and old gpu bottlnecked console ports all the graphs in a ram bench would be almost identical as would most cpu if they tossed them in with those test methods
edit just looking through there cpu bench its kinda useless without some games that are more cpu limited mixed in
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/CPU/1073
Intel Core i5 4690K (88W)
4C/4T, 3.5 GHz, 1MB L2, 6MB L3
108.2
Intel Core i7 4790K (88W)
4C/8T, 4.0 GHz, 1MB L2, 8MB L3
107.5
Intel Core i7 4765T (35W)
4C/8T, 2 GHz, 1MB L2 , 8MB L3
103.5
Intel Core i3 4360 (54W)
2C/4T, 3.7 GHz, 0.5MB L2, 4MB L3
95.5
how many people think a i3 would still pull a solid 60fps in bf4 if you swapped from sp to mp? let alone 95fps
those graphs suggest that the difference between i3 and i5 is not even noticeable but most of us know that it really is