Or alternatively, it was called "your kid is stupid. You should seriously consider steering him into some gig or vocation that is appropriate for his aptitude, such as a brick layer or something, maybe a post hole digger."ADHD was none existent where I come from. There was no such a thing as learning disability. It was called "some people suck at learning/school".
I don't know if you've noticed, but those kinds of opportunities to climb the socioeconomic ladder are becoming more scant. How dare parents actually recognize the real consequences for kids who are labeled "just not good or smart enough" and want to do anything they can to change the outcome and give their child more opportunity without having to endure the stigma or trauma of being "not smart enough for schooling and such".
I'm against all ADHD medication. A guy in my statistics class had SVT from the stimulants and it may have damaged his heart and he might need heart surgery.
But at least he got an A.
Also, I think the TV and internet are what addle childrens (and my) brains. The cure has thus far been reading and meditating. Some quality mind-stimulating non-screen time. Which is hard to come by really, hanging out with friends, eating at restaurants, drinking beer, and driving in rush hour aren't really quality contemplative brain-building activities like everyone does these days.
Will your kid struggle to read at first? Yes. Thats normal, that IS the changes taking place. He'll squirm around he won't be able to focus. Eventually he will be able to focus, and he might even like it. But it does expose the inability to calm your mind.
Read a book with your kid. Look up books for his age group find one you like and read it with him.
You are a retard. You want to limit a person to the limits of their genetics... Pathetic.Some kids aren't meant to be academically successful. Thats not necessarily a bad thing either.
So useful drugs = bad because some retard you knew was snorting them so he could pass tests?
Some kids aren't meant to be academically successful. Thats not necessarily a bad thing either. There are already too many lawyers, soon to be too many of everything at this rate. Pharmacists, Nurses, Phd's, Teachers, yeah.
This.Quality follow-up to my post. People love to reinforce my points.
So useful drugs = bad because some retard you knew was snorting them so he could pass tests?
Also, blaming TV and internet, to me, means you have absolutely no understanding ADD or the effects of medication. And you look like a World War I veteran.
There are quite a few in this thread.You are a retard. You want to limit a person to the limits of their genetics... Pathetic.
I guess giving brain altering drugs to a 5 year old ....at the time when brain science in general is in it's foundation stages.....is socially acceptable now?
This country is really fucked.
You are a retard. You want to limit a person to the limits of their genetics... Pathetic.
Well sure, because all your decisions are made based on the impact on society. You never make decisions purely in your own interest or that of your child. You think all these parents are trying to raise a prodigy who is destined to earn a MS or PhD? Most of these parents are just trying to get their child through high school with decent enough GPA, core competence, and academic performance to make succeeding in a junior or community college for two years within the realm of possibility for them.Yea because parents can tell the future. Everyone going to college at once won't cause the tuition to rise and record numbers end-up enslaved by student debt their whole life or anything.
Wait, so neuroscience is still quite early but you've already made-up your mind that the science will NOT show convincingly that these disabilities or disorders have a modifiable neurological basis? And you base this on what, a poor understanding of just how persuasive the science already is that something more is going on neurologically in ADD, autism, dyslexia, and bipolar disorders than "your child just needs to be disciplined or just needs to accept early that he isn't ever going to be smart enough for any skilled field"? Fantastic!So telling the kid "you have a disability and here is some drugs" makes it better? If anything it kind of forces the kid to give up. Don't even get me going on Brain science....truth is, human kind hardly knew ANYTHING until recently. We are in EARLY stages of Brain science RIGHT NOW.
Wait, so neuroscience is still quite early but you've already made-up your mind that the science will NOT show convincingly that these disabilities or disorders have a neurological basis?
And you base this on what, a poor understanding of just how persuasive the science already is that something more is going on neurologically in ADD, autism, and bipolar disorders than "your child just needs to be disciplined or just needs to accept early that he isn't ever going to be smart enough for any skilled field"? Fantastic!
The whole point of this thread was to get opinions from people who had been on these drugs long term, starting in childhood.
Medication at this age is a concern to me, but so is Myxolydian's early point about what are the consequences of NOT helping him right now.
That said, I'm thoroughly enjoying the wild assumptions and baseless attacks on my parenting. We read plenty of books together; we eat well; we've tried other strategies prior to this. I don't consider myself 'done' now that I've got a prescription. So, yeah.
You are a retard. You want to limit a person to the limits of their genetics... Pathetic.
wait wait wait, so everyone in class must gets As?
wait wait wait, so everyone in class must gets As?
anyway, i was diagnosed with ADD 15 years ago in 10th grade or so. My parents didn't know what it does and just signed off waivers and i was on Ritalin for a year or so. It was NOT a night and day for me, maybe it was but wasn't as pronounced. My grades didn't improve significantly, but I did feel more euphoric and was a bit more social after i was on it (before i was an introvert big time). I gave one pill to my friend before a final exam, and he was GLUED to his textbook and studied 4 hours straight (yeah yeah, i know it is wrong, he could have allergic reaction or died, i was a kid). But I never had the same affect, i stopped using it once i got to college.
Now, in my 30s, I still do have focusing issue, and I don't know will Ritalin or meds be a solution, and i wonder had my college life would have been different if I was on meds.
I would also agree on what another member suggested: coffee calms me down and allow me to focus slightly better.
So one stimulant works for you and the other didn't?
Heavy ritalin prescription was in full swing when you were prescribed - did they experiment with dosage at all to try to tune it to your needs? I assume Ritalin was the only med you tried (until caffiene)?
That's wise. I'll probably do the same... I'll run it at 1.7v at 892, .05v won't make much of a difference in temp but may make a difference in stability on very stressful apps.
I'll run UT in a loop tonight and go to bed. We'll see how it all looks in the morning. 🙂