- Mar 20, 2000
- 102,395
- 8,558
- 126
it's a "premium" compact car to slot in below the TSX. while it's not as ugly as previous acuras (a plus), it gets terrible gas mileage for what it is. a civic. the base 2.0 engine (available only with a slushbox) gets all of 24/32. is it unreasonable to expect a premium compact car to get similar mileage to other compact cars that are likely to be near its price range such as the skyactiv mazda3 (28/40) or focus titanium (27/37)?
the 2.4 (available only with a manual) gets 20/29 (granted, that's roughly the same as the notorious 2.5L mazda3, but that design isn't *new*).
maybe it's just that honda hasn't figured out how to game the new EPA ratings yet.
the 2.4 (available only with a manual) gets 20/29 (granted, that's roughly the same as the notorious 2.5L mazda3, but that design isn't *new*).
maybe it's just that honda hasn't figured out how to game the new EPA ratings yet.