It seems, that for one day in history, the laws of physics and reason were thrown out...
-In one day, three huge steel skyscrapers collapsed onto their own footprint. When this normally only happens from controlled demolition, that day it was caused by fire, which had never happened before, and hasn't happened since.
-On that day, one of the biggest tragedies this country has seen, it was okay for all of the debris to be taken away before analysis.
-On that day, our nation's air defense program, NORAD, fudged. Despite having all the resources available to them, they couldn't spot a plan that was heading straight for the Pentagon. Even when the plane circled overhead, lining up the trajectory, they didn't do anything about it. (Yet, as many will recall, last year two small aircraft accidentally wandered into White House airspace. Within minutes they were being escorted by fighter aircraft out of the area. Yet, on 9/11, we failed to find a commercial jetliner in restricted airspace.) And isn't it a bit odd that Dick Cheney was in charge of NORAD that day?
-For the first time in history, a plane hit a building (the Pentagon), and vaporized the wreckage. At the same time, we were still able to identify all but one of the bodies. Ignore the fact that it is impossible for jet fuel to vaporize the titanium used in the fuselage of the aircraft, much less do so while leaving bodies intact.
-For the first time in history, somebody with barely any piloting skills in a commercial jetliner was able to fly within feet of the ground, not even scathing the lawn, and manage to hit the one part of the Pentagon that was reinforced for just such an impact. Also, the fact that he was able to pull off some incredible moves that even seasoned pilots said would be hard, if not impossible, to do in a jet that large at those speeds.
-And finally, again, against what we think we know about air crashes, there were no bodies at the crash site in PA. A photographer on site even talked about how there was nothing except a hole in the ground. No plane debris, no bodies, no blood. Lastly, how the heck did the engine from the plane land over a mile away?
It is obvious that the current administration benefited from 9/11. It created fear for Muslims, and gave them the excuses they needed to pass their liberty-stripping Patriot Act, which Congress was not allowed to read the first time it was approved. It gave them the excust to invade Iraq, which recent reports have indicated Bush and Cheney wanted to do even before they were in office, regardless of what the UN said.
Comparing us to CTs who wear tin-foil hats is unfair. Even I think it is retarted to think a small piece of tin-foil is going to block mind-control, much less think that mind-control is possible in that sense. If you asked me three weeks ago what I thought about 9/11, I would have voiced my opinion that bin Laden is a coward for hiding. Since I have discovered the controversy over 9/11, I've done plenty of research. The first time I saw Loose Change I didn't believe it until he started talking about who had to benefit from this. It makes so much sense now. This has happened throughout history, yet are we going to notice it when it happens again? Some have, and we are growing in size everyday. We simply call for an independent, international investigation where the members are not picked by our administration. One that does not ignore critical aspects of that day, including WTC 7, the possibility of pre-positioned explosives, why nobody even noticed a plane heading for the Pentagon, and why a number of people, within minutes of the crash, carried off debris into a waiting truck, covered in a blue tarp. The pancake theory is unreasonable, considering video evidence showing molten metal, giving evidence to another source of heat other than the fires. Also, if the pancake theory were correct, why did the floors not show at least some sort of vertical stacking? They were pulverized into small fragments and dust. Not even the 47 steel core columns stood, which is most peculiar, considering they should have been sticking straight up, even if the floors collapsed. How is a fire at the top of the building supposed to melt steel in the core of it 1000 feet below?
Enough questions, we need more answers. Answers to questions that are being ignored...
Occam's Razor holds more to be true than most seem to believe. If you consider both sides, one saying that fire took down three steel structures that day, you have to think, "wow, that's odd. Never happened before. Wouldn't the sprinkler system help to put them out?" And the other, that explosives were used, it is more simple to think that it was caused by explosives. Especially considering WTC7, which collapsed in less than 7 seconds, just like a controlled demolition. It didn't topple, it didn't pancake, it imploded in on itself. To say this was caused by anything other than explosives shows a suspension of reason on part of the person making the claim. Even with Larry Silverstein's admission to pulling the building, people still doubt the obvious.
Those buildings look like they were brought down by explosives...so why is it so hard to think that they were? It cannot be said there is no evidence for explosives, because there is plenty of it. Audio of explosions before the collapses, video of dust coming from the base, video of squibs (which many tout as material ejected out as the floor pancaked. But if that were the case, why would it not be ejected across an entire floor? If the floors were indeed pancaking, wouldn't material be ejected at every level? How was material being ejected tens of stories below the destruction wave? The floors there hadn't even been touched by the "pancake chain reaction" yet.
And to think, these are only a few of the questions that haven't been answered, and I doubt they will, unless an independent investigation is conducted.
I think you're looking at this the wrong way, though. As you continue denying such simple information, more and more people are being exposed to the facts each day (people who previously had no idea, such as myself). For example, the doubters kept pushing up threads of 9/11 Conspiracy movies in the off topic forum, which just happened to catch my attention in January of 2006. I freely admit, I bought the official story until then. So to people like you, I say thanks for bumping the threads with your denials :thumbsup: No matter how hard you try, the truth will continue spreading. From email to email... AIM profile to AIM profile. The real culprits of 9/11 may never be brought to justice, but the truth will continue to spread. Internet FTW
Facebook
Twitter