• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Acer Aspire One... Starcraft or no?

foolfromhell

Senior member
The only game I play away from my desktop is starcraft. I want an Acer Aspire One. It is certainly within hardware requirements, but does anyone have any experience? Screen too small, etc.?

And, is the SSD version available with Windows?
 
Originally posted by: slackwarelinux
It is very playable with a proper mouse.

I think the mouse is key. I've tried playing games with touchpads and... bleh.
 
starcraft came out like in 1998.. so i'm pretty sure anything in the past 10 years could play it 😛

 
Originally posted by: clandren
starcraft came out like in 1998.. so i'm pretty sure anything in the past 10 years could play it 😛

I remember playing SC on my Dell v350 (which ran from about early 1998 until November 2004 when it died) with a Pentium 2 @ 250MHz, ~96MB RAM, Windows 98, 56k dialup, an ATI Rage something or other, and a 13GB hard drive.
 
I played SC back in the day on a 233mhz Pentium, I think you'd have a hard time finding any laptop that still works and can't run Starcraft. I played it on my EEE 900 and the screen was big enough for me.
 
I wasnt asking if the issue was with specs, but people's experiences? Especially concerning screen size, battery, etc.

I ordered an eee pc 1000h anyway. Heh
 
Originally posted by: Juked07
Doesn't sc run at 640x480?

Read the posts. It will run fine.

yup. bigger screen will just make everything bigger, no difference to gameplay (amount of map viewable etc)
 
i'm typing on a 1000h right now, and it is definitely capable of running games like WC3:FT and CnC:Generals.
 
If I recall correctly, Diablo II ran at either 640x480 or 800x600 only and the software renderer was faster than than the OpenGL version - even with a decent 3D card. I think it also supported GLide on 3dfx cards (remember those?)
 
Back
Top