Are you serious?
snip
Couple of key phrases that you seemed to miss. The first one is "aging pipeline" and the other would be that its running through the friggen artic, pretty much the worst environment on the earth.
Are you serious?
snip
Doesn't stop accidents from happening, just this year and somewhat local:
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jul/04/nation/la-na-oil-spill-yellowstone-20110704
Oil spill outrages Montana residents
Up to 42,000 gallons surge overnight Friday into the Yellowstone River, and some say Exxon Mobil's cleanup needs more oversight.
July 04, 2011|By Molly Hennessy-Fiske, Los Angeles Times
An oil spill in Montana's Yellowstone River surged toward North Dakota on Sunday as outraged residents demanded more government oversight of Exxon Mobil's cleanup.
An estimated 750 to 1,000 barrels, or up to 42,000 gallons, spilled through a damaged pipeline in the riverbed, Exxon spokesman Alan Jeffers said. The break near Billings could be related to the river's high water level, officials said.
lower energy prices, more American jobs, less imported oil being used from the ME, building better relationship with our neighbor to the North. financially though? nothing, i don't really care about money and I left the industry a few years ago.
just an FYI dave, we only have TWO industries left in this country worth a damn. We have our energy production and our food production/industry. Our high tech sector is going to disappear because it's all being made over seas, so forget about that. We're running on the cores of what build society now and you think it would be good to squash growth in one of the sectors? That makes no sense bud. You cannot have a functioning society without food and energy surplus.
Just showing that the industry does have issues and that we have valid concerns whenever something this large is proposed. To say something like, "as long as maintenance doesn't slack off" is missing the point. There are accidents and when they do happen they tend to be huge. The impact of these projects needs to be considered and whether you like it or not those who can potentially be impacted need to be involved as well. You know, that whole states right thing.
Also ironic that you use this in your sig, but have no issues with the government approving the Keystone plan when citizens have valid concerns on the impact of the pipeline in their parts of the country.
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government."
Huge? Huge is when a tanker goes down because there are no pipelines to move the oil. Huge is not 750-1,000 barrels. While its not good at all, pipelines are a necessary risk we take for the life you live.
How much do you gain personally?
No shit right? What fucking fear mongering from the article. Switching it to gallons to get the bigger number, lols.
Can we talk about the Deepwater Horizon spill and BP's cost cutting? Was that one large enough to be worthy of discussion?
So you're saying you have no fucking clue what you're talking about?
We're already exporting tons of refined product at the moment and our local demand is down.
and what has that got us? Higher prices at the pump
How's that for a reward for consuming less, just like electricity.
I know exactly what I am talking about and have called your ilk on the carpet.
Americans are getting more and more tired of it everyday and you know it.
spike, i do not consider finance a sector worth saving or something that's even supporting us currently. i see it as a failing tool of the elite, one soon to collapse. i don't think pharma will last a financial collapse so i see that going poof then as well. healthcare is good, but again same thing shit will be leaving here soon and without the finance sector, how is that going to move forward?
I do agree that if the government confiscates land for this project without compensation they deserve to get smashed upon by the citizenry. I do not support those kinds of actions, but I do support the building of the Keystone XL and I think people should work together to get it done as safely.
i was just throwing those out there as large components of our economy. didnt know you were judging their long-term viability.
and what has that got us? Higher prices at the pump
How's that for a reward for consuming less, just like electricity.
I know exactly what I am talking about and have called your ilk on the carpet.
Americans are getting more and more tired of it everyday and you know it.
Isn't that only kind that matters?
No shit right? What fucking fear mongering from the article. Switching it to gallons to get the bigger number, lols.
Absolutely and I still doubt it was BP cost cutting. Wasn't it one of their contractors that fucked this off? Mostly likely they were trying to increase their profits and screwed the pooch. I've seen that happen before and I'm pretty sure EVERYONE has in one industry or another. Also there's a lot of bureaucracy when it comes to doing these kinds of jobs, it's not as simple as "here's your job go get it done" and I'm talking about shit as simple as "put a new gasket on this flange" or "go take some readings from those gauges".
you're right we shouldn't be exporting refined crude if we're still importing refined crude.
That's a bullshit game of profits the oil companies are playing
It's 3.20-.40 around me. Prices are down as they should be right now and you're right we shouldn't be exporting refined crude if we're still importing refined crude. That's a bullshit game of profits the oil companies are playing, but it is currently benefiting us even if I do not like it or approve of it. Also, why do you hate Americans? You do not want them to have high paying jobs? In California you'd be hard pressed to find someone working in this industry making less than like 20 bucks an hour, there just isn't very many of them and if they are it's because they're new to it. I started out at like 17.80 an hour and within a year I was making 20, 2 years I was making around 25. So why do you hate American's Dave? I want to give them good jobs in an industry that is REQUIRED by the world at this moment, you want to take away any chance at real wealth creation they have.
At least I got that much out of you.
Merry Christmas to you too :thumbsup:
Darwin I hear you on the reason why we do it, but we shouldn't imo. It makes sense from a profit standpoint to import refined while exporting our higher quality and more sought after refined product, but I just don't think it makes long term.
Drawin, that's what I mean by the contractors fault. They should have known better than to do that. Screw what the person paying them says, it's their reputation on the line because they're the ones pushing the buttons and turning the wrenches. I would never have done anything that would have put my reputation, my unions reputation or my companies reputation on the line for someone paying us. That just isn't good business.
Transcanada says it will create at most 6000 Temporary jobs at best estimates. Why do idiot politicians like Michelle Bachmann and Faux News always say tens of thousands? Bachmann used 20,000 in a debate! She's nuts!