About Joe the Plumber

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Joe the Plumber wouldn't be such a joke if he hadn't of tried to take financial advantage of the whole situation. One he got an agent he became a shit stain.

Because he should just sit around and let your hero Obama take care of everything in his life for him? We are just 2 short months away from free healthcare, free education, and guaranteed jobs. Admit it, you do get a little tingle in your leg when you hear Barack's name don't you?
What a childish post. What he should have done is just go back to work and get on with his life instead of trying to cash in on his chance encounter with Obama. On top of that he gleefully let McCain and Palin use him for their propaganda which made him look like a bigger tool.

Gotcha, we should not ever try to take advantage of chance happenings in our life. And if people do, they should have their lives destroyed for it. I don't have any issues with the Obama camp going after Joe to a certain extent, but to try to destroy them is going to far. But, I am sure you will continue to make excuses for Obama for the next 4 years.. Hopefully you never get on the wrong end of the Obama hate machine. If Bush had did the same thing to someone supporting YOUR positions, you would be frothing at the mouth like Harvey calling for his impeachment on war crimes (ok, now THAT was childish..)
 

Stuxnet

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2005
8,392
1
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Siddhartha
Did the icon "Joe the Plumber" connect with anyone here or anyone you know? Towards the end of the election, the Republicans relied heavily on this concept.

Mr Joe the Plumber did not help Mr McCain carry Ohio but did he resonant with the Republican base?

I know there were issues with the guy who asked Mr Obama how his tax program was going to affect him. I am not talking about that guy. I am talking about the blue collar, craftsman small business owner.

It was no Swift Boat.

Americans saw it for what it was 110% fraud.

Dbags like you think it was the Swift Boat ads that sunk Kerry, when in fact, it was Kerry's incessant, thinly veiled pandering (fake hunting trips and all) and hypocrisy (military records, anyone?) that exposed him for the 110% fraud he was. Sad that man couldn't beat Bush, but it had little to do with Swift Boating.

On that note, it was 4 years ago. Let it go.

Regarding JtP, he merely epitomized the camp's inability to run an effective, poignant campaign. While I think it's utterly disgusting what the media and the left did to him, it was a gross misfire by McCain and, frankly, Joe himself.

I think he "landed", but only insofar as he showed that the left and the media will not tolerate asking Obama tough questions on the spot. As far as an actual campaign tool, he was a disaster.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: TheRedUnderURBed
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY



I swear you people are so blinded by your ideology you fail to think rationally.

Yet you are the one with Reagan shilling for some corporation in your sig fearmongering about how medicare=communism o0o0o0o0o.
BTW where is the hammer and sickle? We have had medicare for ages now lolololz

Thanks for the cold-war era comedy gold in your highly partisan sig though, I forgot how foolish Reagan was, and you REALLY want to criticize someone else for being an idealist?
You must be a parody poster. If so my hat is off.

Edit: Spelled rayguns name wrong..err whatever

Just because I happen to agree with Reagan and the idea that the gov't should only do what it is originally charged with does not mean I'm blinded by ideology. I happen to enjoy looking at the other side's position and atleast try to understand why they believe what they believe. In this case, there is no basis for someone trying to attach progressive taxation to "the American dream" like BMW tried to do. Ofcourse there are the usual apologists and whiners who will jump all over a person like me just because I dared question "progressive" taxation- I'm used to it here since this place is full of libs who don't seem to understand much about it.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Gotcha, we should not ever try to take advantage of chance happenings in our life. And if people do, they should have their lives destroyed for it. I don't have any issues with the Obama camp going after Joe to a certain extent, but to try to destroy them is going to far. But, I am sure you will continue to make excuses for Obama for the next 4 years.. Hopefully you never get on the wrong end of the Obama hate machine. If Bush had did the same thing to someone supporting YOUR positions, you would be frothing at the mouth like Harvey calling for his impeachment on war crimes (ok, now THAT was childish..)
I wasn't aware Joe was destroyed. Also it's good to see you back posting with the same venom you did under your other handle.

 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,713
15,116
146
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Gotcha, we should not ever try to take advantage of chance happenings in our life. And if people do, they should have their lives destroyed for it. I don't have any issues with the Obama camp going after Joe to a certain extent, but to try to destroy them is going to far. But, I am sure you will continue to make excuses for Obama for the next 4 years.. Hopefully you never get on the wrong end of the Obama hate machine. If Bush had did the same thing to someone supporting YOUR positions, you would be frothing at the mouth like Harvey calling for his impeachment on war crimes (ok, now THAT was childish..)
I wasn't aware Joe was destroyed. Also it's good to see you back posting with the same venom you did under your other handle.

Only his credibility...
 

Stuxnet

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2005
8,392
1
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Gotcha, we should not ever try to take advantage of chance happenings in our life. And if people do, they should have their lives destroyed for it. I don't have any issues with the Obama camp going after Joe to a certain extent, but to try to destroy them is going to far. But, I am sure you will continue to make excuses for Obama for the next 4 years.. Hopefully you never get on the wrong end of the Obama hate machine. If Bush had did the same thing to someone supporting YOUR positions, you would be frothing at the mouth like Harvey calling for his impeachment on war crimes (ok, now THAT was childish..)
I wasn't aware Joe was destroyed. Also it's good to see you back posting with the same venom you did under your other handle.

His post wasn't venomous at all. As far as Joe goes, he was destroyed. Granted, after awhile he was simply inviting it, but the first 24 hours after his "initial exposure" was a very, very disgusting and depressing moment in our political history. While people like you were calling McCain out for his negative ads, Joe the Plumber was having his entrails ripped out, diced, and served for dinner by Obama's supporters. It was truly sad.
 

alien42

Lifer
Nov 28, 2004
12,886
3,314
136
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Gotcha, we should not ever try to take advantage of chance happenings in our life. And if people do, they should have their lives destroyed for it. I don't have any issues with the Obama camp going after Joe to a certain extent, but to try to destroy them is going to far. But, I am sure you will continue to make excuses for Obama for the next 4 years.. Hopefully you never get on the wrong end of the Obama hate machine. If Bush had did the same thing to someone supporting YOUR positions, you would be frothing at the mouth like Harvey calling for his impeachment on war crimes (ok, now THAT was childish..)
I wasn't aware Joe was destroyed. Also it's good to see you back posting with the same venom you did under your other handle.

His post wasn't venomous at all. As far as Joe goes, he was destroyed. Granted, after awhile he was simply inviting it, but the first 24 hours after his "initial exposure" was a very, very disgusting and depressing moment in our political history. While people like you were calling McCain out for his negative ads, Joe the Plumber was having his entrails ripped out, diced, and served for dinner by Obama's supporters. It was truly sad.

you actually think Joe the Douchebag was destroyed? he took his fifteen minutes of fame and capitalized on it by going on national news programs and spewing ignorant and false statements and opinions about a national election. he is the fucking idiot who stated that Obama winning would be the end of Israel. and how about that book deal he signed? you are as moronic as Joe if you actually believe what you say.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11...arts-002.html?ref=arts
 

Stuxnet

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2005
8,392
1
0
Originally posted by: alien42
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Gotcha, we should not ever try to take advantage of chance happenings in our life. And if people do, they should have their lives destroyed for it. I don't have any issues with the Obama camp going after Joe to a certain extent, but to try to destroy them is going to far. But, I am sure you will continue to make excuses for Obama for the next 4 years.. Hopefully you never get on the wrong end of the Obama hate machine. If Bush had did the same thing to someone supporting YOUR positions, you would be frothing at the mouth like Harvey calling for his impeachment on war crimes (ok, now THAT was childish..)
I wasn't aware Joe was destroyed. Also it's good to see you back posting with the same venom you did under your other handle.

His post wasn't venomous at all. As far as Joe goes, he was destroyed. Granted, after awhile he was simply inviting it, but the first 24 hours after his "initial exposure" was a very, very disgusting and depressing moment in our political history. While people like you were calling McCain out for his negative ads, Joe the Plumber was having his entrails ripped out, diced, and served for dinner by Obama's supporters. It was truly sad.

you actually think Joe the Douchebag was destroyed? he took his fifteen minutes of fame and capitalized on it by going on national news programs and spewing ignorant and false statements and opinions about a national election. he is the fucking idiot who stated that Obama winning would be the end of Israel. and how about that book deal he signed? you are as moronic as Joe if you actually believe what you say.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11...arts-002.html?ref=arts

Now THERE'S a venomous post!

Read my post again. Comprehend. THEN respond. When you don't do things in the right order, you just look like an ass. Specifically, read where I said "the first 24 hours".

Thanks for playing, though!
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,839
2,625
136
jboourne77: I have no desire to step into your hissy fight, but you are foolish if you think either that Sam aka Joe didn't actively seek out all the publicity he could get-from the get-go, or that the media was being "Obama supporters" by doing their job and digging into the true facts of the situation. It is perhaps unfortunate the Sam aka Joe was such a fraud in nearly every aspect, but perhaps this is yet one more example of McCain's campaign properly failing to vet or investigate. After all, it was McCain himself who gave Sam aka Joe his massive initial publicity during the debate. Ironically it was McCain who chatised the media for publicizing Sam aka Joe when the true facts were not as McCain would have wished.

 

ConstipatedVigilante

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2006
7,670
1
0
Originally posted by: her209
I think it hurt McCain more than helped.

QFT. It made McCain/Palin look like they thought Americans were all retarded blue-collar workers (not that I have anything against blue collar workers).
 

Stuxnet

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2005
8,392
1
0
Originally posted by: Thump553
jboourne77: I have no desire to step into your hissy fight, but you are foolish if you think either that Sam aka Joe didn't actively seek out all the publicity he could get-from the get-go, or that the media was being "Obama supporters" by doing their job and digging into the true facts of the situation. It is perhaps unfortunate the Sam aka Joe was such a fraud in nearly every aspect, but perhaps this is yet one more example of McCain's campaign properly failing to vet or investigate. After all, it was McCain himself who gave Sam aka Joe his massive initial publicity during the debate. Ironically it was McCain who chatised the media for publicizing Sam aka Joe when the true facts were not as McCain would have wished.

Joe had already been raped and pillaged before you had any idea what his intentions were. So although he turned out to be an attention whore who was behind on his taxes, you didn't know that when you decided his was a life that needed destroyed. Before you had any reason to rip the man to shreds, you did it anyway. So many people were so eager to eat this man alive that you clung to such nonsense as "oh noes his REAL name is SAM!!!" (oh my god the bastard goes by his middle name, like 30 million other Americans... you can spare us the "Sam aka Joe" macros) and "oh noes he doesn't really have a plumbing license" (doesn't need one). Before there was anything to sink your teeth into, your jaw was already locked into position. Long before the man placed himself in the spotlight on the McCain campaign trail, he was merely a voter asking a question. But that was all it took for you dogs to rip a person's life apart. Sure, he "asked for it" LATER, but that's after the fact. You can't defend your actions with events that took place after your actions.

Heaven forbid someone else had asked an "uncomfortable" question who really didn't want the spotlight or a public enema. Are we not allowed to ask questions of our candidates if we're not prepared to have our image smeared by the media, the government, and apologists like you, alien42, dmcowen, etc? The fact is, when Joe's question resonated with voters, you set after him with all you had, and that was a rather telling moment. He received more scrutiny by people like you and, frankly, the media, than our next First Lady.

Now, I make no excuses for Joe once he started campaigning for McCain. Once you take that step, it's open season just like it is on the candidates. But prior to thrusting himself into the spotlight (and asking a question during a stump speech is NOT "thrusting one's self into the spotlight", no matter how much you try to convince yourself otherwise), he deserved none of that. It blows my mind that the same group of people who still, to this day, whine about Swift Boat tactics will stop at nothing to defend and contribute to garbage, gutter-tactics like that.

During election cycles, there are animals on both sides of the fence that are blinded by their partisan hate. They're handicapped by their tunnel vision and they subconsciously accept that any means are justified by their candidate's victory. Well, congratulations :thumbsup: .
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
Joe lied his ass off to get attention, and he was a phoney. Thus Joe and Mccain both are fools, sorry if reality hurts your feelings for him.

See what the douche is up to nowadays since the election?
He is a terrible actor too it seems.
Poor Joe. An unlicensed plumber who really cares about bringing the DTV transition for Spanish and Chinese languages, and how to get government to pay for it.
/facepalm
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Gotcha, we should not ever try to take advantage of chance happenings in our life. And if people do, they should have their lives destroyed for it. I don't have any issues with the Obama camp going after Joe to a certain extent, but to try to destroy them is going to far. But, I am sure you will continue to make excuses for Obama for the next 4 years.. Hopefully you never get on the wrong end of the Obama hate machine. If Bush had did the same thing to someone supporting YOUR positions, you would be frothing at the mouth like Harvey calling for his impeachment on war crimes (ok, now THAT was childish..)
I wasn't aware Joe was destroyed. Also it's good to see you back posting with the same venom you did under your other handle.

His post wasn't venomous at all. As far as Joe goes, he was destroyed. Granted, after awhile he was simply inviting it, but the first 24 hours after his "initial exposure" was a very, very disgusting and depressing moment in our political history. While people like you were calling McCain out for his negative ads, Joe the Plumber was having his entrails ripped out, diced, and served for dinner by Obama's supporters. It was truly sad.
Of course if the shoe was on the other foot, if he had confronted McCain and Obama then used him for his talking points in the Debate I'm sure the Republicans led by Hannity and Limbaugh would have eviscerated the guy and none of you would have made a peep in his defense.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Gotcha, we should not ever try to take advantage of chance happenings in our life. And if people do, they should have their lives destroyed for it. I don't have any issues with the Obama camp going after Joe to a certain extent, but to try to destroy them is going to far. But, I am sure you will continue to make excuses for Obama for the next 4 years.. Hopefully you never get on the wrong end of the Obama hate machine. If Bush had did the same thing to someone supporting YOUR positions, you would be frothing at the mouth like Harvey calling for his impeachment on war crimes (ok, now THAT was childish..)
I wasn't aware Joe was destroyed. Also it's good to see you back posting with the same venom you did under your other handle.

His post wasn't venomous at all. As far as Joe goes, he was destroyed. Granted, after awhile he was simply inviting it, but the first 24 hours after his "initial exposure" was a very, very disgusting and depressing moment in our political history. While people like you were calling McCain out for his negative ads, Joe the Plumber was having his entrails ripped out, diced, and served for dinner by Obama's supporters. It was truly sad.
Of course if the shoe was on the other foot, if he had confronted McCain and Obama then used him for his talking points in the Debate I'm sure the Republicans led by Hannity and Limbaugh would have eviscerated the guy and none of you would have made a peep in his defense.

You mean like abusing state positions for political dirt? Hmmm....
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Gotcha, we should not ever try to take advantage of chance happenings in our life. And if people do, they should have their lives destroyed for it. I don't have any issues with the Obama camp going after Joe to a certain extent, but to try to destroy them is going to far. But, I am sure you will continue to make excuses for Obama for the next 4 years.. Hopefully you never get on the wrong end of the Obama hate machine. If Bush had did the same thing to someone supporting YOUR positions, you would be frothing at the mouth like Harvey calling for his impeachment on war crimes (ok, now THAT was childish..)
I wasn't aware Joe was destroyed. Also it's good to see you back posting with the same venom you did under your other handle.

His post wasn't venomous at all. As far as Joe goes, he was destroyed. Granted, after awhile he was simply inviting it, but the first 24 hours after his "initial exposure" was a very, very disgusting and depressing moment in our political history. While people like you were calling McCain out for his negative ads, Joe the Plumber was having his entrails ripped out, diced, and served for dinner by Obama's supporters. It was truly sad.
Of course if the shoe was on the other foot, if he had confronted McCain and Obama then used him for his talking points in the Debate I'm sure the Republicans led by Hannity and Limbaugh would have eviscerated the guy and none of you would have made a peep in his defense.

You mean like abusing state positions for political dirt? Hmmm....
Hmmm....:laugh:

 

Stuxnet

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2005
8,392
1
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Gotcha, we should not ever try to take advantage of chance happenings in our life. And if people do, they should have their lives destroyed for it. I don't have any issues with the Obama camp going after Joe to a certain extent, but to try to destroy them is going to far. But, I am sure you will continue to make excuses for Obama for the next 4 years.. Hopefully you never get on the wrong end of the Obama hate machine. If Bush had did the same thing to someone supporting YOUR positions, you would be frothing at the mouth like Harvey calling for his impeachment on war crimes (ok, now THAT was childish..)
I wasn't aware Joe was destroyed. Also it's good to see you back posting with the same venom you did under your other handle.

His post wasn't venomous at all. As far as Joe goes, he was destroyed. Granted, after awhile he was simply inviting it, but the first 24 hours after his "initial exposure" was a very, very disgusting and depressing moment in our political history. While people like you were calling McCain out for his negative ads, Joe the Plumber was having his entrails ripped out, diced, and served for dinner by Obama's supporters. It was truly sad.
Of course if the shoe was on the other foot, if he had confronted McCain and Obama then used him for his talking points in the Debate I'm sure the Republicans led by Hannity and Limbaugh would have eviscerated the guy and none of you would have made a peep in his defense.

I thought we don't entertain such hypotheticals around here? Conjecture this, conjecture that, whenever I make such statements I'm stopped dead in my tracks on it, no matter how obvious it may be. But since there seems to be a small window of opportunity...

... if the shoe truly was on the other foot, you'd be chastising Republicans for stomping out the little guy with Rovian tactics just because he dared question the "Traitor in Chief". This would be one more shining example of why "Repugs" were cretinous bastards capable of any evil necessary to ensure victory.

What took place in the first few days after Joe's "initial exposure" is an embarrassment to the human race, no matter who does it. I don't care what the political affiliation is.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Gotcha, we should not ever try to take advantage of chance happenings in our life. And if people do, they should have their lives destroyed for it. I don't have any issues with the Obama camp going after Joe to a certain extent, but to try to destroy them is going to far. But, I am sure you will continue to make excuses for Obama for the next 4 years.. Hopefully you never get on the wrong end of the Obama hate machine. If Bush had did the same thing to someone supporting YOUR positions, you would be frothing at the mouth like Harvey calling for his impeachment on war crimes (ok, now THAT was childish..)
I wasn't aware Joe was destroyed. Also it's good to see you back posting with the same venom you did under your other handle.

His post wasn't venomous at all. As far as Joe goes, he was destroyed. Granted, after awhile he was simply inviting it, but the first 24 hours after his "initial exposure" was a very, very disgusting and depressing moment in our political history. While people like you were calling McCain out for his negative ads, Joe the Plumber was having his entrails ripped out, diced, and served for dinner by Obama's supporters. It was truly sad.
Of course if the shoe was on the other foot, if he had confronted McCain and Obama then used him for his talking points in the Debate I'm sure the Republicans led by Hannity and Limbaugh would have eviscerated the guy and none of you would have made a peep in his defense.

I thought we don't entertain such hypotheticals around here? Conjecture this, conjecture that, whenever I make such statements I'm stopped dead in my tracks on it, no matter how obvious it may be. But since there seems to be a small window of opportunity...

... if the shoe truly was on the other foot, you'd be chastising Republicans for stomping out the little guy with Rovian tactics just because he dared question the "Traitor in Chief". This would be one more shining example of why "Repugs" were cretinous bastards capable of any evil necessary to ensure victory.

What took place in the first few days after Joe's "initial exposure" is an embarrassment to the human race, no matter who does it. I don't care what the political affiliation is.
Actually I believe most of us in this thread are just arguing for the sake of arguing and that we really couldn't give a shit about this guy one way or another. I know I don't but if you say he was wronged I'll go along with it just because you say so.

 

Stuxnet

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2005
8,392
1
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Gotcha, we should not ever try to take advantage of chance happenings in our life. And if people do, they should have their lives destroyed for it. I don't have any issues with the Obama camp going after Joe to a certain extent, but to try to destroy them is going to far. But, I am sure you will continue to make excuses for Obama for the next 4 years.. Hopefully you never get on the wrong end of the Obama hate machine. If Bush had did the same thing to someone supporting YOUR positions, you would be frothing at the mouth like Harvey calling for his impeachment on war crimes (ok, now THAT was childish..)
I wasn't aware Joe was destroyed. Also it's good to see you back posting with the same venom you did under your other handle.

His post wasn't venomous at all. As far as Joe goes, he was destroyed. Granted, after awhile he was simply inviting it, but the first 24 hours after his "initial exposure" was a very, very disgusting and depressing moment in our political history. While people like you were calling McCain out for his negative ads, Joe the Plumber was having his entrails ripped out, diced, and served for dinner by Obama's supporters. It was truly sad.
Of course if the shoe was on the other foot, if he had confronted McCain and Obama then used him for his talking points in the Debate I'm sure the Republicans led by Hannity and Limbaugh would have eviscerated the guy and none of you would have made a peep in his defense.

I thought we don't entertain such hypotheticals around here? Conjecture this, conjecture that, whenever I make such statements I'm stopped dead in my tracks on it, no matter how obvious it may be. But since there seems to be a small window of opportunity...

... if the shoe truly was on the other foot, you'd be chastising Republicans for stomping out the little guy with Rovian tactics just because he dared question the "Traitor in Chief". This would be one more shining example of why "Repugs" were cretinous bastards capable of any evil necessary to ensure victory.

What took place in the first few days after Joe's "initial exposure" is an embarrassment to the human race, no matter who does it. I don't care what the political affiliation is.

Actually I believe most of us in this thread are just arguing for the sake of arguing and that we really couldn't give a shit about this guy one way or another. I know I don't but if you say he was wronged I'll go along with it just because you say so.

1. Man asks difficult question of my candidate. Must destroy him to nullify point.
2. Eww... in hindsight that isn't very pretty. Must minimize events and trivialize this "stranger".
 

GroundedSailor

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2001
2,502
0
76
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Gotcha, we should not ever try to take advantage of chance happenings in our life. And if people do, they should have their lives destroyed for it. I don't have any issues with the Obama camp going after Joe to a certain extent, but to try to destroy them is going to far. But, I am sure you will continue to make excuses for Obama for the next 4 years.. Hopefully you never get on the wrong end of the Obama hate machine. If Bush had did the same thing to someone supporting YOUR positions, you would be frothing at the mouth like Harvey calling for his impeachment on war crimes (ok, now THAT was childish..)
I wasn't aware Joe was destroyed. Also it's good to see you back posting with the same venom you did under your other handle.

His post wasn't venomous at all. As far as Joe goes, he was destroyed. Granted, after awhile he was simply inviting it, but the first 24 hours after his "initial exposure" was a very, very disgusting and depressing moment in our political history. While people like you were calling McCain out for his negative ads, Joe the Plumber was having his entrails ripped out, diced, and served for dinner by Obama's supporters. It was truly sad.
Of course if the shoe was on the other foot, if he had confronted McCain and Obama then used him for his talking points in the Debate I'm sure the Republicans led by Hannity and Limbaugh would have eviscerated the guy and none of you would have made a peep in his defense.

I thought we don't entertain such hypotheticals around here? Conjecture this, conjecture that, whenever I make such statements I'm stopped dead in my tracks on it, no matter how obvious it may be. But since there seems to be a small window of opportunity...

... if the shoe truly was on the other foot, you'd be chastising Republicans for stomping out the little guy with Rovian tactics just because he dared question the "Traitor in Chief". This would be one more shining example of why "Repugs" were cretinous bastards capable of any evil necessary to ensure victory.

What took place in the first few days after Joe's "initial exposure" is an embarrassment to the human race, no matter who does it. I don't care what the political affiliation is.

Actually I believe most of us in this thread are just arguing for the sake of arguing and that we really couldn't give a shit about this guy one way or another. I know I don't but if you say he was wronged I'll go along with it just because you say so.

1. Man asks difficult question of my candidate. Must destroy him to nullify point.
2. Eww... in hindsight that isn't very pretty. Must minimize events and trivialize this "stranger".

Joe the plumber was made into an issue by John the McCain as soon as that clip became public. That is what triggered the whole saga. Whether the McCain campaign thought it would make a good talking point or John himself ignored advice from his campaign I don't know.

To claim that the first exposure came from the opposite camp is disingenuous. Had John McCain not made an issue of it Joe the Plumber would have remained an unknown.

 

Stuxnet

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2005
8,392
1
0
Originally posted by: GroundedSailor
To claim that the first exposure came from the opposite camp is disingenuous. Had John McCain not made an issue of it Joe the Plumber would have remained an unknown.

Claiming it's disingenuous is disingenuous.

But even if McCain seized the opportunity before the story broke on its own - which is not true - so what? That still doesn't make the man fair game. Instead of disputing the message, people went after the man, and they did it without haste or relent. In the wee hours after the awkward situation started getting exposure (and before McCain seized on it), it was out that Joe's first name was actually Sam and he didn't have a plumbing license. When supporters couldn't neutralize (read: erase) what transpired, they went after the man instead.

No matter how you try to slice, dice, or spin it, it stinks.
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Originally posted by: jbourne77

What took place in the first few days after Joe's "initial exposure" is an embarrassment to the human race, no matter who does it. I don't care what the political affiliation is.

I'd like to hear what you're referring to specifically. If the worst you can come up with is that MSNBC reported his real first name and the fact that he wasn't making anywhere near 250K, didn't have a license, etc., then it's pretty clear to the vast majority of people this is nowhere near as bad as your portrayal of "embarrassment to the human race".
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Gotcha, we should not ever try to take advantage of chance happenings in our life. And if people do, they should have their lives destroyed for it. I don't have any issues with the Obama camp going after Joe to a certain extent, but to try to destroy them is going to far. But, I am sure you will continue to make excuses for Obama for the next 4 years.. Hopefully you never get on the wrong end of the Obama hate machine. If Bush had did the same thing to someone supporting YOUR positions, you would be frothing at the mouth like Harvey calling for his impeachment on war crimes (ok, now THAT was childish..)
I wasn't aware Joe was destroyed. Also it's good to see you back posting with the same venom you did under your other handle.

His post wasn't venomous at all. As far as Joe goes, he was destroyed. Granted, after awhile he was simply inviting it, but the first 24 hours after his "initial exposure" was a very, very disgusting and depressing moment in our political history. While people like you were calling McCain out for his negative ads, Joe the Plumber was having his entrails ripped out, diced, and served for dinner by Obama's supporters. It was truly sad.
Of course if the shoe was on the other foot, if he had confronted McCain and Obama then used him for his talking points in the Debate I'm sure the Republicans led by Hannity and Limbaugh would have eviscerated the guy and none of you would have made a peep in his defense.

I thought we don't entertain such hypotheticals around here? Conjecture this, conjecture that, whenever I make such statements I'm stopped dead in my tracks on it, no matter how obvious it may be. But since there seems to be a small window of opportunity...

... if the shoe truly was on the other foot, you'd be chastising Republicans for stomping out the little guy with Rovian tactics just because he dared question the "Traitor in Chief". This would be one more shining example of why "Repugs" were cretinous bastards capable of any evil necessary to ensure victory.

What took place in the first few days after Joe's "initial exposure" is an embarrassment to the human race, no matter who does it. I don't care what the political affiliation is.

Actually I believe most of us in this thread are just arguing for the sake of arguing and that we really couldn't give a shit about this guy one way or another. I know I don't but if you say he was wronged I'll go along with it just because you say so.

1. Man asks difficult question of my candidate. Must destroy him to nullify point.
2. Eww... in hindsight that isn't very pretty. Must minimize events and trivialize this "stranger".
LOL,listen to you. Sometimes it seems you actually believe this crap you're posting. Poor Joe the Plumber, I bet he's doing better than he was before John the McCain exploited him.
 

Stuxnet

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2005
8,392
1
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Gotcha, we should not ever try to take advantage of chance happenings in our life. And if people do, they should have their lives destroyed for it. I don't have any issues with the Obama camp going after Joe to a certain extent, but to try to destroy them is going to far. But, I am sure you will continue to make excuses for Obama for the next 4 years.. Hopefully you never get on the wrong end of the Obama hate machine. If Bush had did the same thing to someone supporting YOUR positions, you would be frothing at the mouth like Harvey calling for his impeachment on war crimes (ok, now THAT was childish..)
I wasn't aware Joe was destroyed. Also it's good to see you back posting with the same venom you did under your other handle.

His post wasn't venomous at all. As far as Joe goes, he was destroyed. Granted, after awhile he was simply inviting it, but the first 24 hours after his "initial exposure" was a very, very disgusting and depressing moment in our political history. While people like you were calling McCain out for his negative ads, Joe the Plumber was having his entrails ripped out, diced, and served for dinner by Obama's supporters. It was truly sad.
Of course if the shoe was on the other foot, if he had confronted McCain and Obama then used him for his talking points in the Debate I'm sure the Republicans led by Hannity and Limbaugh would have eviscerated the guy and none of you would have made a peep in his defense.

I thought we don't entertain such hypotheticals around here? Conjecture this, conjecture that, whenever I make such statements I'm stopped dead in my tracks on it, no matter how obvious it may be. But since there seems to be a small window of opportunity...

... if the shoe truly was on the other foot, you'd be chastising Republicans for stomping out the little guy with Rovian tactics just because he dared question the "Traitor in Chief". This would be one more shining example of why "Repugs" were cretinous bastards capable of any evil necessary to ensure victory.

What took place in the first few days after Joe's "initial exposure" is an embarrassment to the human race, no matter who does it. I don't care what the political affiliation is.

Actually I believe most of us in this thread are just arguing for the sake of arguing and that we really couldn't give a shit about this guy one way or another. I know I don't but if you say he was wronged I'll go along with it just because you say so.

1. Man asks difficult question of my candidate. Must destroy him to nullify point.
2. Eww... in hindsight that isn't very pretty. Must minimize events and trivialize this "stranger".
LOL,listen to you. Sometimes it seems you actually believe this crap you're posting. Poor Joe the Plumber, I bet he's doing better than he was before John the McCain exploited him.

Strike a nerve, did I? Bolded = likewise ;)

When it hits you that this isn't really about Joe, specifically, let me know.
 

Stuxnet

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2005
8,392
1
0
Originally posted by: Evan
Originally posted by: jbourne77

What took place in the first few days after Joe's "initial exposure" is an embarrassment to the human race, no matter who does it. I don't care what the political affiliation is.

I'd like to hear what you're referring to specifically. If the worst you can come up with is that MSNBC reported his real first name and the fact that he wasn't making anywhere near 250K, didn't have a license, etc., then it's pretty clear to the vast majority of people this is nowhere near as bad as your portrayal of "embarrassment to the human race".

Why was Joe even being investigated to this extent at this point? What I'm referring to is that we had government officials in Ohio investigating the man, and the media/public trying to get their hands on every facet of his personal life that they could. A simple question never warranted such a response. But people were so infuriated over the exchange between him and Obama (more specifically, infuriated that people took notice) that they couldn't see straight.

All I have to say at this point is that I don't ever want to hear about the "swift boating" of John Kerry again. At least he was running for President.
 

alien42

Lifer
Nov 28, 2004
12,886
3,314
136
Originally posted by: jbourne77
Originally posted by: Evan
Originally posted by: jbourne77

What took place in the first few days after Joe's "initial exposure" is an embarrassment to the human race, no matter who does it. I don't care what the political affiliation is.

I'd like to hear what you're referring to specifically. If the worst you can come up with is that MSNBC reported his real first name and the fact that he wasn't making anywhere near 250K, didn't have a license, etc., then it's pretty clear to the vast majority of people this is nowhere near as bad as your portrayal of "embarrassment to the human race".

Why was Joe even being investigated to this extent at this point? What I'm referring to is that we had government officials in Ohio investigating the man, and the media/public trying to get their hands on every facet of his personal life that they could. A simple question never warranted such a response. But people were so infuriated over the exchange between him and Obama (more specifically, infuriated that people took notice) that they couldn't see straight.

All I have to say at this point is that I don't ever want to hear about the "swift boating" of John Kerry again. At least he was running for President.

Joe the Douchebag was lying through his teeth and he got busted, why in the world you would choose to defend him is beyond reason.