Originally posted by: Thump553
jboourne77: I have no desire to step into your hissy fight, but you are foolish if you think either that Sam aka Joe didn't actively seek out all the publicity he could get-from the get-go, or that the media was being "Obama supporters" by doing their job and digging into the true facts of the situation. It is perhaps unfortunate the Sam aka Joe was such a fraud in nearly every aspect, but perhaps this is yet one more example of McCain's campaign properly failing to vet or investigate. After all, it was McCain himself who gave Sam aka Joe his massive initial publicity during the debate. Ironically it was McCain who chatised the media for publicizing Sam aka Joe when the true facts were not as McCain would have wished.
Joe had already been raped and pillaged before you had any idea what his intentions were. So although he turned out to be an attention whore who was behind on his taxes, you didn't know that when you decided his was a life that needed destroyed. Before you had any reason to rip the man to shreds, you did it anyway. So many people were so eager to eat this man alive that you clung to such nonsense as "oh noes his REAL name is SAM!!!" (oh my god the bastard goes by his middle name, like 30 million other Americans... you can spare us the "Sam aka Joe" macros) and "oh noes he doesn't really have a plumbing license" (doesn't need one). Before there was anything to sink your teeth into, your jaw was already locked into position. Long before the man placed himself in the spotlight on the McCain campaign trail, he was merely a voter asking a question. But that was all it took for you dogs to rip a person's life apart. Sure, he "asked for it" LATER, but that's after the fact. You can't defend your actions with events that took place
after your actions.
Heaven forbid someone else had asked an "uncomfortable" question who really didn't want the spotlight or a public enema. Are we not allowed to ask questions of our candidates if we're not prepared to have our image smeared by the media, the government, and apologists like you, alien42, dmcowen, etc? The fact is, when Joe's question resonated with voters, you set after him with all you had, and that was a rather telling moment. He received more scrutiny by people like you and, frankly, the media, than our next First Lady.
Now, I make no excuses for Joe once he started campaigning for McCain. Once you take that step, it's open season just like it is on the candidates. But prior to thrusting himself into the spotlight (and asking a question during a stump speech is NOT "thrusting one's self into the spotlight", no matter how much you try to convince yourself otherwise), he deserved none of that. It blows my mind that the same group of people who still, to this day, whine about Swift Boat tactics will stop at nothing to defend and contribute to garbage, gutter-tactics like that.
During election cycles, there are animals on both sides of the fence that are blinded by their partisan hate. They're handicapped by their tunnel vision and they subconsciously accept that any means are justified by their candidate's victory. Well, congratulations :thumbsup: .