Abortion puzzles me

Page 12 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Atlantean

Diamond Member
May 2, 2001
5,296
1
0
I don't want this to degenerate into a flamefest I just felt like stating something I feel strongly about and hopefully sparking some intelligent discussion.

This is not a subject that can or will ever be discussed intelligently.
 

Banzai042

Senior member
Jul 25, 2005
489
0
0
Originally posted by: Atlantean
I don't want this to degenerate into a flamefest I just felt like stating something I feel strongly about and hopefully sparking some intelligent discussion.

This is not a subject that can or will ever be discussed intelligently.

Why do you say that? I'd say that rational (I.E. not yelling) discussion presenting logical statements can be considered intelligent discussion.
 

jagec

Lifer
Apr 30, 2004
24,442
6
81
Originally posted by: Banzai042
Originally posted by: Atlantean
I don't want this to degenerate into a flamefest I just felt like stating something I feel strongly about and hopefully sparking some intelligent discussion.

This is not a subject that can or will ever be discussed intelligently.

Why do you say that? I'd say that rational (I.E. not yelling) discussion presenting logical statements can be considered intelligent discussion.

I bolded what's missing in this thread.
 

Banzai042

Senior member
Jul 25, 2005
489
0
0
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: Banzai042
Originally posted by: Atlantean
I don't want this to degenerate into a flamefest I just felt like stating something I feel strongly about and hopefully sparking some intelligent discussion.

This is not a subject that can or will ever be discussed intelligently.

Why do you say that? I'd say that rational (I.E. not yelling) discussion presenting logical statements can be considered intelligent discussion.

I bolded what's missing in this thread.

How is that missing from this thread? I'll grant that there have been irrational comments from both sides, however I don't think it's fair to say that there have been no logical posts in this thread. In fact, please go back to my long post above and address every single point that you consider illogical so i can correct it to your satisfaction (if possible, it's always possible that you and i have differing opinions on what is logical).

Edit: Just to clarify, i'm just saying that i would consider my post to be one of several that tries to approach the side i defend from a logical standpoint.
 

Eeezee

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2005
9,922
0
76
Originally posted by: joedrake
Originally posted by: Eeezee
That sentence is proof that you are the product of misinformation. Please inform yourself of actual facts and statistics before you open your mouth again.

By the wording of your last paragraph, you would support abortion if two methods of birth control are being used. This happens in real life. There is no 100% fool-proof method for preventing pregnancy. Even abstinence is not fool-proof. The successful transfer of semen can occur without intercourse.

How about rape? The woman should make sure that the rapist is using a condom, right? :confused:
So much for actual facts.

Rape: (quote myself)
Sure, I can symphasize with people who were raped, but that doesn't give the person the right to end/prevent another's life.
They should be spending their time and money trying to find and stop the rapists instead on abortion.

Those are actual facts. You are the product of misinformation. Go look up real data. Come back when you're smarter.

Rape should give the woman every right to abort the fetus. She did not choose to bring it into this world, she should not have to bear the responsibility. Finding and convicting the rapist won't change that.
 

Eeezee

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2005
9,922
0
76
Originally posted by: OdiN
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: OdiN
Originally posted by: Dacalo
Originally posted by: joedrake
Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Tell you what, you worry about yourself and stop carring about what the rest of us do mmmkay?

It's really none of your business.

Put perfectly.
Sweet. I'm gonna go murder 5 people (whom have no friends or close family)... don't worry about them, though, (or me) its none of your business.

This issue is not black/white, zealot. You are a simpleton if you believe that this issue is simplistic as you state.

Although it saddens me to see babies getting aborted especially in later stages, the choice is the mother's alone. It's a choice made between the mother, the doctor, and God/Allah/Buddah (if she is religious).

It isn't the mothers choice. How can any sane person say that it's up to her if she wants to kill a child? She already made her choice.

She decided to risk pregnancy, which has consequences and responsibilities. If she doesn't want those responsibilities then she should abstain from sexual relations or make damn sure that there are two methods of birth control being used. Abortion used as birth control is just sickening.

That sentence is proof that you are the product of misinformation. Please inform yourself of actual facts and statistics before you open your mouth again.

By the wording of your last paragraph, you would support abortion if two methods of birth control are being used. This happens in real life. There is no 100% fool-proof method for preventing pregnancy. Even abstinence is not fool-proof. The successful transfer of semen can occur without intercourse.

How about rape? The woman should make sure that the rapist is using a condom, right? :confused:

Don't try to put words into my mouth, fool.

The last sentence proves nothing of the sort, and I don't know how you got that stupid idea in your head.

And no, I don't support abortion if two methods of birth control are used and you still end up pregnant. I know 3 kids - one is "the patch" one is "the pill" and one is "the shot". I know it's not 100%, but that is a risk that you take when you have sex. You need to be prepared to accept the consequences of having sex or you shouldn't be having it.

Abstinance not fool proof? That's bullshit. So semen just magically appears inside a woman and impregnates her? Where do you come up with this bullshit?

Rape is different. It sucks that anyone would have to go through that. I can at least understand why a woman would want an abortion due to that, even if I don't condone it. I know someone who was a product of rape and the world would not be as good of a place if her mother decided to abort her due to her being raped.

I QUOTED YOU. You said some idiotic things and I called you on it. I didn't put any words in your mouth, moron.

And abstinence is NOT fool proof. Do you seriously lack the mental capacity to imagine a situation where this could happen? There are a handful of cases every year.
 

Eeezee

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2005
9,922
0
76
Originally posted by: TBone48
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: TBone48

What other legal things involve killing someone?

The war in Iraq?

The death penalty? Justifiable homicide? (Killing someone in self-defense.)

OK, the death penalty is valid, and many people fight against it. However, it (in theory) involves someone judged to be sane who has committed an act determined to be worthy of death. An unborn child has done nothing to anyone.

As for self defense, that also involves someone taking concious action. I don't see it being applicable here either.

edit: sorry, my quoting skilz aren't.[/quote]

Wrong. The child is syphoning blood and nutrients from the mother without her consent. That's illegal. If you tried to do this and got caught, you'd go to jail. It's a conscious action that the fetus is taking if you're an idiot and believe the fetus is sentient.[/quote]


What is your problem? Are you capable of intelligent debate at all, or do you only know how to attack like a classless fool? Your "point" is completely moronic, as are you. Good Day, Sir![/quote]

Don't like the truth? ;)
 

Eeezee

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2005
9,922
0
76
Originally posted by: altonb1
Originally posted by: bigdog1218
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Tell you what, you worry about yourself and stop carring about what the rest of us do mmmkay?

It's really none of your business.

So how's your Anti-SUV brigade doing? Staying out of peoples business? Hypocrites aren't really worth much in any conversation.

Arkitech, totally agree with you, people today choose not to take responsibility for their actions and find it easier to pass them on to someone else. Someone who supports abortion is just saying they they shouldn't be responsible for the choices they make in life. They made bad choices that they led them into a situation, and then use the 1st amendment as an excuse so they can get rid of their problem.

Then, like amicold and SLCentral, they call it a fetus or an embryo because it makes them feel better that their killing nothing, rather than a human being. They come up with absurd reasons to try to justify that they support killing humans. It's a little weird that a baby born at 9 months wasn't a human at 7 months, but a baby born at 7 months is a human. Then they spit out reasons of umbilical cords, sentient life, the babys location, clawing for anything so they can get rid of that responsiblity that they're too scared, or not ready to have.

Then, they cry that even birth control methods don't always work because that's easier then saying, I made the choice to have sex and I'll deal with the responsiblities because of that choice. Instead of actually having reasons fo an abortion, it's just a bunch of excuses so they can live their selfish, irresponsible lives without having the guilt of killing a human.


Well said. If I claim to be pro-choice, then what am I labeled? The fact is, we all have a "choice" but if we claim to choose life we are told that we are not really choosing? The argument is not really "pro-choice vs pro-life." It is pro-abortion vs pro-life.

-- Proud dad of 5 kids!

It's "pro-choice" because the supporters want to allow you the choice of an abortion. The "pro-choice" side is in fact pro-life, but they also believe that a woman should have the right to choose whether her fetus will develop into a child. There are many pro-choice people that would never have an abortion for themselves. I don't like abortion, but nothing gives me the right to tell a couple that they can't have one.

The "pro-life" side doesn't want anyone to have this choice.

So it's really pro-choice vs anti-choice
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,697
6,257
126
The only solution to this debate is to incorporate a number of Rights into the Procedure of Abortion that determines the outcome:

1) The womans Right to Choose

2) A Humans Right to Self Defence

3) related to 2, a US Citizens Right to Bear Arms in the attempt at Self Defence

I propose that once a Woman has chosen to Abort, a small Handgun is surgically implanted into the Womb 24 hours prior to the procedure. If the Fetus wants to live it can choose to defend itself from either the mother or the Doctor(or other practioner) by using the Handgun in Self Defense. If the Fetus Defends itself, it is to be respected and no further action towards an Abortion shall be taken. If the Fetus does not Defend itself, it obviously agrees with the Mothers choice of action.

Your welcome! [/thread]
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
6 pages in, cold calculated logic can do no harm. Unwanted children are a bane on society. Abort them all.
 

CessnaFlyer

Banned
Jul 31, 2005
137
0
0
Originally posted by: JS80
Yet your wife can "choose" to "abort" the baby and you can't do a damn thing and it's sanctioned by the government.


This is so wrong, but it's legal!!!!
 

CessnaFlyer

Banned
Jul 31, 2005
137
0
0
Originally posted by: OdiN
Abortion = Muder

Plain and simple. As said, there are only a few cases in which I can understand why - a pregnancy that threatens the life of the mother, etc.

Think of it this way. A mother who is say 2 months pregnant is mugged and stabbed, which causes her unborn child to die. Would you want the mugger charged with assault with a deadly weapon, or murder?

He could only be charged with performing abortions without a liscense!

 

CessnaFlyer

Banned
Jul 31, 2005
137
0
0
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: creedog
The rest of the world is light years behind america

This is off topic, but people like you make Americans look like jackasses overseas.

Americans don't care what the World thinks:thumbsup:

 

amicold

Platinum Member
Feb 7, 2005
2,656
1
81
Originally posted by: OdiN
Originally posted by: amicold
Originally posted by: TBone48
Originally posted by: amicold


Because I'm sure most women are having the abortions before the baby forms to the point you're at. Regardless, there's a lot of beautiful things in life. Some find insects beautiful but that doesn't stop you from stepping on ants, spiders, etc. Or grabbing the can of Raid when those wasps nest near your house.

So bugs = human babies?

Insects/Arachnids = Lifeform
Embryo = Sentient Lifeform


Fixed

Don't 'fix' my posts ever again you fvckstick. I'll beat you with aborted fetuses upside the face and neck.
 

totalcommand

Platinum Member
Apr 21, 2004
2,487
0
0
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: totalcommand
Originally posted by: jagec
This thread is pathetic. Clear proof that the moment abortion is mentioned, the IQ of all those arguing drops by 70 points or more. I swear, I haven't seen a single argument yet that isn't based on completely ludicrous assumptions.

hell yes, you can disconnect me. you never consented to have me attached in the first place.

i can count on dipsh!ts like you to thread crap and not make an argument themselves, cause they have none. they can't come up with an original idea.

Your parents never gave you "the talk", did they? You see, when a man and a woman love each other very much...

Oh, and as for "attaching crap to it", forgive me for bringing my moderate views into an abortion debate. Clearly the only acceptible positions I'm allowed to hold are "all abortions should be banned under all circumstances", or "all abortions are A-OK no matter what":roll:

think harder. your IQ is lower than most in this thread. we actually have similar views, except I have reasons to back it up. i think if the baby is viable outside the body, it should not be aborted.

i noticed you still have no reasons. kudos.
 

totalcommand

Platinum Member
Apr 21, 2004
2,487
0
0
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
Originally posted by: totalcommand
MAJOR SNIPPAGE!

We are looking at this from two different points of view. yours is more legal, mine is more moral. that is fine because we will not ever agree anyway.

actually, i think the right to one's own body is both a moral and ethical issue.

You talk about explict consent. I believe that the act of sex during the fertile cycle, without protection is, by it's very act, consent to all consequences that come from it. The act of abortion is taking back that consent by means of terminating a potential life and in late term, a viable baby. You and I will never see that from the same POV though. And my original perfect world list allows for the 'shite happens' scenerio.

I agree - there are analogies I could use to attempt to convince you, but I will spare you - we probably won't ever agree. I believe that people's belief on this issue comes from their religion.

You are correct that while I am not agreeable to the thought that a woman should be in total control of her body, the life of a viable baby and the future 18-21yrs of the father without question and some restriction, i will concede that i do not have a legal answer. I have my feelings and my somewhat emotional and moral opinions and feelings. Apart from my original list of stuff, i do not have an answer that will protect a baby while not overtaking the mother. but I still do not think that abortions anytime, for any reason as often as wanted is right. it is just not right.

What I am looking for is a reason why you think the government should be regulating how women use their bodies.


the abortion on demand and as a method of birth control is not really a farce. there are many, many women who have 2, 3 and sometimes 4 abortions. i know of at least four of these women in my life and have heard of many more. while the majority of women are not repeaters, there is a % of women who are. it is not a total farce.

the issue is blown way out of proportion. by focusing on the bad apples, you ignore the issues of the good-hearted women for whom this issue is real and a huge deal to them.

i am confused by your last paragraph. it was my understanding that through out all of this, your stance was that government should NOT regulate abortion, but now you are saying that they should. Am i to take it that you mean that the government should regulate only making abortion freely available to whomever, whenever they want but stay out of any form of regulation to protect viable babies?

sorry for the confusion. the government cannot regulate how people use their organs. this is just immoral. they can, however, educate the public, so that they can make getter decisions themselves on how they would like to proceed.

the scare stories of thousands of women dying by coathanger abortions... it was blown out of proportion to scare ppl.
Text

possibly. but my moral stance on this issue remains the same. and as a practical issue i find it hard to believe abortions will stop once it is outlawed.

Again, you and I will never agree... but i appreciate a 'non hateful' debate/discussion.

as do i.
 

WolverineGator

Golden Member
Mar 20, 2001
1,011
0
76
I am a maternal and child health data manager for the State of Florida. We had 213,000 women give birth to 218,000 kids in 2004 (latest data available). About half of those deliveries were paid for by the state (Medicaid (= poor people)) resulting in a significant tax burden.

Many of those who abort eventually have a child and they are better able to raise that child, usually with fewer social and support services. Unwanted babies are more prone to developmental delay in school. You might guess that abortions are disproportionately higher among Medicaid women. If abortion were illegal, unsafe abortion practices would certainly continue. That is common knowledge in the maternal and child health field, but perhaps not so to the lay public (ATOT).

My point is, abortion isn't simply yes/no. There are consequences for everyone: families, schools, government, health care systems, and taxpayers.
 

DaShen

Lifer
Dec 1, 2000
10,710
1
0
Originally posted by: Syringer
Originally posted by: Arkitech
I don't want this to degenerate into a flamefest I just felt like stating something I feel strongly about and hopefully sparking some intelligent discussion.

Good luck with that.

/Waits for someone to make the obligatory lawnchair/beer (then spider) comment

Done and done

Pulls out lawn chair and :beer:

And OP why would you post something inflammatory like this anyways. :roll:
 

DaShen

Lifer
Dec 1, 2000
10,710
1
0
Anyone like PIE.... I love PIE.

It goes so well with my :beer: while sitting outside on my lawnchair.

Key lime is so good. I think I will go get some now.
 

Jules

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,213
0
0
Murder? LOL so when a person pleases himself i guy he murders dozens of would to be baby's huh? lolololol