I don't want this to degenerate into a flamefest I just felt like stating something I feel strongly about and hopefully sparking some intelligent discussion.
Originally posted by: Atlantean
I don't want this to degenerate into a flamefest I just felt like stating something I feel strongly about and hopefully sparking some intelligent discussion.
This is not a subject that can or will ever be discussed intelligently.
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Should I pull up the lawn chair and get a beer?
Originally posted by: Banzai042
Originally posted by: Atlantean
I don't want this to degenerate into a flamefest I just felt like stating something I feel strongly about and hopefully sparking some intelligent discussion.
This is not a subject that can or will ever be discussed intelligently.
Why do you say that? I'd say that rational (I.E. not yelling) discussion presenting logical statements can be considered intelligent discussion.
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: Banzai042
Originally posted by: Atlantean
I don't want this to degenerate into a flamefest I just felt like stating something I feel strongly about and hopefully sparking some intelligent discussion.
This is not a subject that can or will ever be discussed intelligently.
Why do you say that? I'd say that rational (I.E. not yelling) discussion presenting logical statements can be considered intelligent discussion.
I bolded what's missing in this thread.
Originally posted by: joedrake
So much for actual facts.Originally posted by: Eeezee
That sentence is proof that you are the product of misinformation. Please inform yourself of actual facts and statistics before you open your mouth again.
By the wording of your last paragraph, you would support abortion if two methods of birth control are being used. This happens in real life. There is no 100% fool-proof method for preventing pregnancy. Even abstinence is not fool-proof. The successful transfer of semen can occur without intercourse.
How about rape? The woman should make sure that the rapist is using a condom, right?![]()
Rape: (quote myself)
Sure, I can symphasize with people who were raped, but that doesn't give the person the right to end/prevent another's life.
They should be spending their time and money trying to find and stop the rapists instead on abortion.
Originally posted by: OdiN
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: OdiN
Originally posted by: Dacalo
Originally posted by: joedrake
Sweet. I'm gonna go murder 5 people (whom have no friends or close family)... don't worry about them, though, (or me) its none of your business.Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Tell you what, you worry about yourself and stop carring about what the rest of us do mmmkay?
It's really none of your business.
Put perfectly.
This issue is not black/white, zealot. You are a simpleton if you believe that this issue is simplistic as you state.
Although it saddens me to see babies getting aborted especially in later stages, the choice is the mother's alone. It's a choice made between the mother, the doctor, and God/Allah/Buddah (if she is religious).
It isn't the mothers choice. How can any sane person say that it's up to her if she wants to kill a child? She already made her choice.
She decided to risk pregnancy, which has consequences and responsibilities. If she doesn't want those responsibilities then she should abstain from sexual relations or make damn sure that there are two methods of birth control being used. Abortion used as birth control is just sickening.
That sentence is proof that you are the product of misinformation. Please inform yourself of actual facts and statistics before you open your mouth again.
By the wording of your last paragraph, you would support abortion if two methods of birth control are being used. This happens in real life. There is no 100% fool-proof method for preventing pregnancy. Even abstinence is not fool-proof. The successful transfer of semen can occur without intercourse.
How about rape? The woman should make sure that the rapist is using a condom, right?![]()
Don't try to put words into my mouth, fool.
The last sentence proves nothing of the sort, and I don't know how you got that stupid idea in your head.
And no, I don't support abortion if two methods of birth control are used and you still end up pregnant. I know 3 kids - one is "the patch" one is "the pill" and one is "the shot". I know it's not 100%, but that is a risk that you take when you have sex. You need to be prepared to accept the consequences of having sex or you shouldn't be having it.
Abstinance not fool proof? That's bullshit. So semen just magically appears inside a woman and impregnates her? Where do you come up with this bullshit?
Rape is different. It sucks that anyone would have to go through that. I can at least understand why a woman would want an abortion due to that, even if I don't condone it. I know someone who was a product of rape and the world would not be as good of a place if her mother decided to abort her due to her being raped.
Originally posted by: TBone48
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: TBone48
What other legal things involve killing someone?
The war in Iraq?
The death penalty? Justifiable homicide? (Killing someone in self-defense.)
Originally posted by: altonb1
Originally posted by: bigdog1218
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Tell you what, you worry about yourself and stop carring about what the rest of us do mmmkay?
It's really none of your business.
So how's your Anti-SUV brigade doing? Staying out of peoples business? Hypocrites aren't really worth much in any conversation.
Arkitech, totally agree with you, people today choose not to take responsibility for their actions and find it easier to pass them on to someone else. Someone who supports abortion is just saying they they shouldn't be responsible for the choices they make in life. They made bad choices that they led them into a situation, and then use the 1st amendment as an excuse so they can get rid of their problem.
Then, like amicold and SLCentral, they call it a fetus or an embryo because it makes them feel better that their killing nothing, rather than a human being. They come up with absurd reasons to try to justify that they support killing humans. It's a little weird that a baby born at 9 months wasn't a human at 7 months, but a baby born at 7 months is a human. Then they spit out reasons of umbilical cords, sentient life, the babys location, clawing for anything so they can get rid of that responsiblity that they're too scared, or not ready to have.
Then, they cry that even birth control methods don't always work because that's easier then saying, I made the choice to have sex and I'll deal with the responsiblities because of that choice. Instead of actually having reasons fo an abortion, it's just a bunch of excuses so they can live their selfish, irresponsible lives without having the guilt of killing a human.
Well said. If I claim to be pro-choice, then what am I labeled? The fact is, we all have a "choice" but if we claim to choose life we are told that we are not really choosing? The argument is not really "pro-choice vs pro-life." It is pro-abortion vs pro-life.
-- Proud dad of 5 kids!
Originally posted by: JS80
Yet your wife can "choose" to "abort" the baby and you can't do a damn thing and it's sanctioned by the government.
Originally posted by: OdiN
Abortion = Muder
Plain and simple. As said, there are only a few cases in which I can understand why - a pregnancy that threatens the life of the mother, etc.
Think of it this way. A mother who is say 2 months pregnant is mugged and stabbed, which causes her unborn child to die. Would you want the mugger charged with assault with a deadly weapon, or murder?
Originally posted by: creedog
The rest of the world is light years behind america
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: creedog
The rest of the world is light years behind america
This is off topic, but people like you make Americans look like jackasses overseas.
Originally posted by: OdiN
Originally posted by: amicold
Originally posted by: TBone48
Originally posted by: amicold
Because I'm sure most women are having the abortions before the baby forms to the point you're at. Regardless, there's a lot of beautiful things in life. Some find insects beautiful but that doesn't stop you from stepping on ants, spiders, etc. Or grabbing the can of Raid when those wasps nest near your house.
So bugs = human babies?
Insects/Arachnids = Lifeform
Embryo = Sentient Lifeform
Fixed
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: totalcommand
Originally posted by: jagec
This thread is pathetic. Clear proof that the moment abortion is mentioned, the IQ of all those arguing drops by 70 points or more. I swear, I haven't seen a single argument yet that isn't based on completely ludicrous assumptions.
hell yes, you can disconnect me. you never consented to have me attached in the first place.
i can count on dipsh!ts like you to thread crap and not make an argument themselves, cause they have none. they can't come up with an original idea.
Your parents never gave you "the talk", did they? You see, when a man and a woman love each other very much...
Oh, and as for "attaching crap to it", forgive me for bringing my moderate views into an abortion debate. Clearly the only acceptible positions I'm allowed to hold are "all abortions should be banned under all circumstances", or "all abortions are A-OK no matter what":roll:
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
Originally posted by: totalcommand
MAJOR SNIPPAGE!
We are looking at this from two different points of view. yours is more legal, mine is more moral. that is fine because we will not ever agree anyway.
You talk about explict consent. I believe that the act of sex during the fertile cycle, without protection is, by it's very act, consent to all consequences that come from it. The act of abortion is taking back that consent by means of terminating a potential life and in late term, a viable baby. You and I will never see that from the same POV though. And my original perfect world list allows for the 'shite happens' scenerio.
You are correct that while I am not agreeable to the thought that a woman should be in total control of her body, the life of a viable baby and the future 18-21yrs of the father without question and some restriction, i will concede that i do not have a legal answer. I have my feelings and my somewhat emotional and moral opinions and feelings. Apart from my original list of stuff, i do not have an answer that will protect a baby while not overtaking the mother. but I still do not think that abortions anytime, for any reason as often as wanted is right. it is just not right.
the abortion on demand and as a method of birth control is not really a farce. there are many, many women who have 2, 3 and sometimes 4 abortions. i know of at least four of these women in my life and have heard of many more. while the majority of women are not repeaters, there is a % of women who are. it is not a total farce.
i am confused by your last paragraph. it was my understanding that through out all of this, your stance was that government should NOT regulate abortion, but now you are saying that they should. Am i to take it that you mean that the government should regulate only making abortion freely available to whomever, whenever they want but stay out of any form of regulation to protect viable babies?
the scare stories of thousands of women dying by coathanger abortions... it was blown out of proportion to scare ppl.
Text
Again, you and I will never agree... but i appreciate a 'non hateful' debate/discussion.
Originally posted by: Syringer
Originally posted by: Arkitech
I don't want this to degenerate into a flamefest I just felt like stating something I feel strongly about and hopefully sparking some intelligent discussion.
Good luck with that.
/Waits for someone to make the obligatory lawnchair/beer (then spider) comment